Location

2006/06/27 13:03:12 15.04 -94.05 30

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to the USGS Rapid Moment Tensor Solution and to the Harvard CMT solutions, if they are available.
SLU
USGS
HARVARD CMT
Mw=5.8  

2006/06/27 13:03:12    EVID:  
LAT: 15.04N, LON:  94.05W, DEPTH:  20
Mw: 5.8, mb: 0.0, Ms: 0.0
Mo=  0.624E+25 (dyne-cm)
  
No. of Stations:  11, GAP: 264
Error (clvd/dc)*100=  30.97
Bandpass:  12 -  60 sec
Nodal plane parameters
      strike     dip    rake
NP1:     135      59     127
NP2:     260      47      46
       
             ---------------             
          ---------------------          
       ---------------------------       
     #------------------------------     
    ###------------------------------    
   ####--------#################------   
  #####---##########################---  
 #####################################-- 
 ####----############################### 
 ###------############################## 
 ##--------################   ########## 
 #----------############### T ########## 
 -------------#############   ########## 
 --------------######################### 
  ---------------######################  
   -----------------##################   
    -------------------##############    
     ---------------------##########     
       ---------------------------       
          ---   ---------------          
              P ------------             
                                         

Stat Dist Az Misfit   Stat Dist Az Misfit
BMR   58 333  0.36    BPAW  62 335  0.42
DSB   76  38  0.75    FFC   40 352  0.38
ISA   29 317  0.57    KBS   78  10  0.58
PAB   80  51  0.47    PSZ   94  38  0.48
Q03C  34 318  0.86    SAW   60 333  0.84
V03C  32 315  0.74
 Misfit > 1 heavily downweighted
	
 OFFSHORE CHIAPAS, MEXICO        
 Epicenter:  15.039  -94.053
 MW 5.8

 USGS MOMENT TENSOR SOLUTION
 Depth  11         No. of sta: 40
 Moment Tensor;   Scale 10**17 Nm
   Mrr= 2.53       Mtt=-3.12
   Mpp= 0.58       Mrt= 4.72
   Mrp=-1.74       Mtp=-0.56
  Principal axes:
   T  Val=  5.81  Plg=56  Azm= 35
   N        0.00      15      283
   P       -5.81      30      184

 Best Double Couple:Mo=5.8*10**17
  NP1:Strike=237 Dip=20 Slip=  43
  NP2:       106     77       105
                                      
               -------                
          -----------------           
        -------############--         
      -----###################-       
    -----########################     
   ----##############   ##########    
   ---############### T ##########    
  ##-################   ###########   
  ##---############################   
  ##-------########################   
  #-------------###################   
  #--------------------############   
   -------------------------------    
   #------------------------------    
    ------------   --------------     
      ---------- P ------------       
        --------   ----------         
          -----------------           
               -------                


        
Subject: quick CMT: 06/27/06, 13:03:12.0, OFFSHORE CHIAPAS, MEXICO, MW=5.8


Here is the solution for the recent event.

June 27, 2006, OFFSHORE CHIAPAS, MEXICO, MW=5.8

Natasha Maternovskaya

CENTROID, MOMENT TENSOR SOLUTION
HARVARD EVENT-FILE NAME C062706E
DATA USED: GSN
L.P. BODY WAVES: 64S,140C, T= 40
SURFACE WAVES:   66S,165C, T= 50
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME       13:03:13.3 0.1
LAT 14.95N 0.01;LON  94.53W 0.01
DEP  12.0 FIX;HALF-DURATION  2.0
MOMENT TENSOR; SCALE 10**24 D-CM
  MRR= 4.00 0.05; MTT=-2.46 0.05
  MPP=-1.53 0.06; MRT= 3.95 0.14
  MRP=-3.42 0.15; MTP= 1.90 0.04
 PRINCIPAL AXES:
 1.(T) VAL=  6.59;PLG=64;AZM= 43
 2.(N)      -0.04;     1;    310
 3.(P)      -6.54;    26;    219
BEST DOUBLE COUPLE:M0=6.6*10**24
 NP1:STRIKE=306;DIP=19;SLIP=  86
 NP2:STRIKE=130;DIP=71;SLIP=  91

            -----------
        ---#########-------
      -#################-----
    #######################----
   ---######################----
  -----#############   #######---
  ------############ T ########--
 --------###########   #########--
 ----------#####################--
 ------------###################--
 --------------##################-
  ---------------###############-
  ------------------############-
   -----   ------------########-
    ---- P ----------------####
      --   ------------------
        -------------------
            -----------

        

Deviatoric Moment Tensor Solution

The following broadband stations were used for the source inversion: BMR BPAW DSB FFC ISA KBS PAB PSZ Q03C SAW V03C



Location of the earthquake (yellow star) and great circle path from the epicenter to each station (red) [created using GMT (Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith, New version of Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS Trans. AGU, 76 329, 1995.)]

All observed and Greens function waveforms are corrected to instrument response to ground velocity in meters/sec for the passband of 0.01 - 5 Hz. Next tre traces were bandpass filtered by the application of the following high- and low-pass stages:

hp c 0.0167 2
lp c 0.0833 2
int
The traces were next integrated to ground displacment in meters. Finally waveforms were cut from 30 seconds before to 140 seconds after the P arrival so that the direct P wave, pP and perhaps the sP are included.

The source inversion is a multipass operation since a lower frequency filter band is used for larger earthquakes and since a search is made over depth. Up to three passed of the outer loop are made, after which the moment magnitude is determined and filter settings readjusted. The inner loop over depth samples all depths from 0 to 800 km with 5 km increments in depth to 50 km, followed by 10 km depth sampling for the remaining range.

The following filter ranges are used according to the moment magnitude Mw:

   FILTER_BAND   FH(s)  FL(s)
       1           60     12      Mw < 6.4
       2          100     20      6.4 < Mw <= 6.9
       3          120     40      Mw > 6.9

For this data set the favored solution is

WVFMTD96   20.0  135.   59.  127.   5.83     0.378 0.248E-06     0.408     0.615 0.209E-06  31.0

The following figures show the sensitivity of the goodness of fit parameter so source depth, the waveform comparison as a function of epicentral distance in degrees and the source to station azimuth

Depth Sensitivity

Goodness of fit as a function of source depth. The measure is 1 - SUM (o -p)2 / SUM o2. A value of 1.0 is the best fit. The best double couple mechanism for the solution depth is plotted above goodness of fit value to indicate how the mefhanism may change with depth.

Fit with Distance

Comparison of the observed traces (red) and solution predicted traces (blue) as a function of epicentral distance in degrees (D). For ease of comparison, the time axis is T - p D, where p is 5.0 seconds/degree and T is the actual travel time. The traces are annotated with the station name at the top.

Fit with Azimuth

Comparison of the observed traces (red) and solution predicted traces (blue) as a function of source to station azimuth in degrees (D). The purpose of this display is to highlight the azimuthal dependence on the first motion. The traces are annotated with the station name at the top.

Inversion Details

Output of wvfmtd96 for the best depth..

Last Changed Tue Jun 27 20:20:20 UTC 2006