Location

2006/04/04 02:30:29 18.70 -107.05 44

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to the USGS Rapid Moment Tensor Solution and to the Harvard CMT solutions, if they are available.
Mw=5.8  

2006/04/04 02:30:29    EVID:  
LAT: 18.70N, LON: 107.05W, DEPTH:  60
Mw: 5.8, mb: 0.0, Ms: 0.0
Mo=  0.642E+25 (dyne-cm)
  
No. of Stations:   5, GAP: 252
Error (clvd/dc)*100=  27.90
Bandpass:  12 -  60 sec
Nodal plane parameters
      strike     dip    rake
NP1:     113      68    -147
NP2:       9      60     -25
       
                ---------#               
           ---------------#####          
        -------------------#######       
      ---------------------#########     
     -----------------------#########    
    ------------------------##########   
   --------------------------##########  
  #--------------------------########### 
  ###------------------------########### 
 ######----------------------############
 ########--------------------############
 ##########-----------------#############
 #############--------------#############
  ################----------############ 
  #####################----############# 
   #######################------####---  
    ######################------------   
     ####################------------    
      ##################------------     
        ##############------------       
           ##########----------          
                ##--------               

Stat Dist Az Misfit   Stat Dist Az Misfit
BBSR  40  61  0.39    PAL   36  44  0.39
PMR   51 335  0.50    SIT   43 337  0.59
SJG   38  84  0.30
 Misfit > 1 heavily downweighted
	
FF COAST OF JALISCO, MEXICO

2006/04/04 02:30:29.32    EVID: LCAD
LAT: 18.70N, LON: 107.04W, DEPTH:  30
Mw: 5.9, mb: 6.0, Ms: 6.0
Mo=  0.895E+25 (dyne-cm)

No. of Stations:   5, GAP: 252
Error (clvd/dc)*100=  32.12

Nodal plane parameters
      strike     dip    rake
NP1:      21      89     -16
NP2:     111      74     181

                ----------
           -----------------###
        -------------------#######
      --------------------##########
     ---------------------###########
    ---------------------#############
   ---------------------###############
  #---------------------################
  ###------------------#################
 ######---------------###################
 #########------------###################
 ############--------####################
 ################---#####################
  ##################--##################
  #################---------############
   ###############---------------------
    #############---------------------
     ############--------------------
      ##########--------------------
        #######-------------------
           ###-----------------
                ----------

Stat Dist Az Misfit   Stat Dist Az Misfit
BBSR  40  61  0.51    PAL   36  44  0.95
PMR   51 335  0.85    SIT   43 337  0.67
SJG   38  84  0.59

Median of misfit:  0.67
  Average misfit:  0.71


        
April 4, 2006, OFF COAST OF JALISCO, MEXICO, MW=5.9

Natasha Maternovskaya

CENTROID, MOMENT TENSOR SOLUTION
HARVARD EVENT-FILE NAME C040406A
DATA USED: GSN
L.P. BODY WAVES: 77S,177C, T= 40
SURFACE WAVES:   79S,172C, T= 50
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME       02:30:28.7 0.1
LAT 18.80N 0.01;LON 107.10W 0.01
DEP  24.2 0.7;HALF-DURATION  2.3
MOMENT TENSOR; SCALE 10**25 D-CM
  MRR=-0.05 0.01; MTT=-0.56 0.01
  MPP= 0.61 0.01; MRT=-0.09 0.03
  MRP= 0.22 0.03; MTP=-0.82 0.01
 PRINCIPAL AXES:
 1.(T) VAL=  1.08;PLG=12;AZM=243
 2.(N)      -0.10;    78;     57
 3.(P)      -0.98;     1;    153
BEST DOUBLE COUPLE:M0=1.0*10**25
 NP1:STRIKE=287;DIP=81;SLIP= 172
 NP2:STRIKE= 18;DIP=82;SLIP=   9

            -----------
        ---------------####
      ----------------#######
    ------------------#########
   ------------------###########
  -------------------############
  ####---------------############
 ##############-----##############
 ##################--#############
 ##################-------########
 #################------------####
  #   ############---------------
  # T ###########----------------
      ##########----------------
    ###########----------------
      ########----------   --
        #####----------- P
            -----------

        

Deviatoric Moment Tensor Solution

The following broadband stations were used for the source inversion: BBSR PAL PMR SIT SJG



Location of the earthquake (yellow star) and great circle path from the epicenter to each station (red) [created using GMT (Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith, New version of Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS Trans. AGU, 76 329, 1995.)]
The traces were next integrated to ground displacment in meters. Finally waveforms were cut from 30 seconds before to 140 seconds after the P arrival so that the direct P wave, pP and perhaps the sP are included.

The source inversion is a multipass operation since a lower frequency filter band is used for larger earthquakes and since a search is made over depth. Up to three passed of the outer loop are made, after which the moment magnitude is determined and filter settings readjusted. The inner loop over depth samples all depths from 0 to 800 km with 5 km increments in depth to 50 km, followed by 10 km depth sampling for the remaining range.

The following filter ranges are used according to the moment magnitude Mw:

   FILTER_BAND   FH(s)  FL(s)
       1           60     12      Mw < 6.4
       2          100     20      6.4 < Mw <= 6.9
       3          120     40      Mw > 6.9

For this data set the favored solution is

WVFMTD96   60.0  113.   68. -147.   5.84     0.562 0.206E-06     0.562     0.739 0.206E-06  27.9

The following figures show the sensitivity of the goodness of fit parameter so source depth, the waveform comparison as a function of epicentral distance in degrees and the source to station azimuth

Depth Sensitivity

Goodness of fit as a function of source depth. The measure is 1 - SUM (o -p)2 / SUM o2. A value of 1.0 is the best fit. The best double couple mechanism for the solution depth is plotted above goodness of fit value to indicate how the mefhanism may change with depth.

Fit with Distance

Comparison of the observed traces (red) and solution predicted traces (blue) as a function of epicentral distance in degrees (D). For ease of comparison, the time axis is T - p D, where p is 5.0 seconds/degree and T is the actual travel time. The traces are annotated with the station name at the top.

Fit with Azimuth

Comparison of the observed traces (red) and solution predicted traces (blue) as a function of source to station azimuth in degrees (D). The purpose of this display is to highlight the azimuthal dependence on the first motion. The traces are annotated with the station name at the top.

Inversion Details

Output of wvfmtd96 for the best depth..

Last Changed Tue Apr 4 15:14:15 UTC 2006