Location

2006/04/01 10:02:19 22.90 121.25 10

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to the USGS Rapid Moment Tensor Solution and to the Harvard CMT solutions, if they are available.
Mw=6.1  

2006/04/01 10:02:19    EVID:  
LAT: 22.90N, LON: 121.25E, DEPTH:  30
Mw: 6.1, mb: 0.0, Ms: 0.0
Mo=  0.155E+26 (dyne-cm)
  
No. of Stations:  70, GAP:  55
Error (clvd/dc)*100=  25.03
Bandpass:  12 -  60 sec
Nodal plane parameters
      strike     dip    rake
NP1:      76      81     160
NP2:     170      70      10
       
                -#########               
           ------##############          
        --------##################       
      ----------####################     
     ----------######################    
    -----------#######################   
   ------------########################  
  -------------######################### 
  -------------######################### 
 ---------------#####################----
 ---------------################---------
 ---------------###########--------------
 ---------------###----------------------
  -------########----------------------- 
  ###############----------------------- 
   ###############---------------------  
    ###############-------------------   
     ##############------------------    
      ##############----------------     
        #############-------------       
           ############--------          
                ########--               

Stat Dist Az Misfit   Stat Dist Az Misfit
ADK   55  41  0.61    AFI   75 112  0.90
AKUT  61  39  0.63    AQU   87 315  0.60
ARU   56 323  0.43    ATKA  56  41  0.57
BBOO  57 165  0.88    BESE  77  31  1.08
BILL  52  19  0.46    BMR   72  30  0.56
BPAW  68  28  0.93    BRVK  48 321  0.91
CRAG  79  33  1.05    CUC   86 312  0.77
D03A  89  38  0.93    D04A  89  37  0.98
DSB   91 331  0.82    FORT  53 172 26.93
GNI   65 305  0.61    GRFO  84 322  0.55
GVD   82 304  0.68    HEBO  90  39  0.93
HLG   84 327  0.64    I05A  92  39  0.99
IBBN  85 325  0.67    IDI   82 304  0.65
ISP   76 305  0.51    K06A  93  40  0.92
KBS   71 348  0.62    KEV   70 338  0.63
KIP   73  73  0.99    KMBL  53 179  3.83
KSDI  74 299  0.86    KURK  43 320  0.32
KWP   78 318  0.60    M04C  93  41  0.98
MALT  70 304  0.56    MAUI  75  73  0.96
MBAR  90 269  0.95    MBWA  43 182  1.14
MCK   69  28  1.03    MUN   54 185  0.99
NIKO  60  41  0.61    NWAO  55 184  1.51
PET   41  33  0.77    PMG   40 138  0.77
RAO   78 128  0.82    RAR   88 113  0.98
RER   77 240  0.75    RGN   81 325  0.58
SDPT  64  38  0.56    SMY   49  39  0.97
SNZO  80 142  0.68    STKA  57 159  0.85
SUMG  83 353  0.75    TIP   86 311  0.67
TIR   83 311  0.68    TIRR  76 312  0.48
TRF   69  28  0.57    TUE   87 320  0.66
UNV   61  39  0.63    VLC   88 317  0.68
VOS   48 321  0.53    VSL   91 314  0.68
VSU   73 326  0.56    VTS   80 312  0.52
WRAB  44 162  0.99    YAK   39   6  0.57
YBH   92  42  0.95    YNG   62 154  0.71
 Misfit > 1 heavily downweighted
	
Mw=6.2 TAIWAN REGION

2006/04/01 10:02:20.46    EVID: KZAW
LAT: 22.91N, LON: 121.20E, DEPTH:  70
Mw: 6.2, mb: 6.1, Ms: 6.1
Mo=  0.223E+26 (dyne-cm)

No. of Stations:  18, GAP: 277
Error (clvd/dc)*100=  83.80

Nodal plane parameters
      strike     dip    rake
NP1:      52      59     153
NP2:     157      67      34

                 ##########
           --##################
        -----#####################
      ------########################
     -------#########################
    ---------########################-
   ----------#######################---
  -----------######################-----
  ------------#####################-----
 -------------####################-------
 --------------#################---------
 --------------################----------
 ---------------#############------------
  ---------------##########-------------
  ----------------#######---------------
   ----------------###-----------------
    ---------------#------------------
     ---------########---------------
      #################-------------
        #################---------
           ################----
                ##########

Stat Dist Az Misfit   Stat Dist Az Misfit
ARU   56 323  1.03    BILL  52  19  0.62
COLA  69  27  0.45    FCC   93  17  0.42
INK   74  21  0.46    KBS   71 348  0.77
KEV   70 338  0.77    KONO  80 331  0.99
MA2   42  21  0.51    MORC  81 320  1.15
NEW   92  34  0.41    OBN   68 322  0.98
PET   41  33  0.64    SIT   78  32  0.42
WDC   93  43  0.51    WLF   87 323  0.93
YAK   39   6  0.65    YSS   29  30  0.76

Median of misfit:  0.64
  Average misfit:  0.69

        
April 1, 2006, TAIWAN REGION, MW=6.2

Natasha Maternovskaya

CENTROID, MOMENT TENSOR SOLUTION
HARVARD EVENT-FILE NAME C040106B
DATA USED: GSN
L.P. BODY WAVES: 83S,201C, T= 40
MANTLE WAVES:    78S,136C, T=125
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME       10:02:22.0 0.1
LAT 22.80N 0.01;LON 121.00E 0.02
DEP  26.5 1.2;HALF-DURATION  2.8
MOMENT TENSOR; SCALE 10**25 D-CM
  MRR= 0.28 0.02; MTT=-0.92 0.02
  MPP= 0.64 0.02; MRT= 1.04 0.06
  MRP=-1.22 0.07; MTP=-1.45 0.02
 PRINCIPAL AXES:
 1.(T) VAL=  2.59;PLG=34;AZM= 57
 2.(N)      -0.76;    53;    260
 3.(P)      -1.84;    11;    154
BEST DOUBLE COUPLE:M0=2.2*10**25
 NP1:STRIKE=201;DIP=58;SLIP=  18
 NP2:STRIKE=101;DIP=75;SLIP= 146

            -----------
        ------------#######
      ------------###########
    ------------###############
   ------------##########   ####
  -----------############ T #####
  ----------#############   #####
 #----------######################
 ####------#######################
 ########-########################
 #########-----###################
  ########-----------------------
  ########-----------------------
   #######----------------------
    ######---------------------
      ####------------   ----
        ###----------- P --
            ----------

        
IES BATS moment-tensor solution :             
 -40.5352020 151.8170013  41.2512016
 151.8170013  14.4167013  66.2492981 x 10+E16 Nt-m
  41.2512016  66.2492981   2.7104602
  Centroid depth :  22 km
  Mw :  6.10
  Average MISFIT : 0.496  ( The fit is good     )
  
 Best double couple solutions : 
 nodal plane(1) strike/dip/slip:  92/ 70/ 165
 nodal plane(2) strike/dip/slip: 187/ 76/  20
  
             --------####            
         -----------#########        
       P ----------#############     
    --   ---------##########   ###   
   ---------------########## T ####  
  ---------------###########   ##### 
 ----------------####################
 ---------------#####################
 ###------------####################-
 ##########-----##############-------
  ##############-------------------- 
   ############--------------------  
    ############------------------   
      ##########----------------     
         #######-------------        
             ####--------            
        

Deviatoric Moment Tensor Solution

The following broadband stations were used for the source inversion: ADK AFI AKUT AQU ARU ATKA BBOO BESE BILL BMR BPAW BRVK CRAG CUC D03A D04A DSB FORT GNI GRFO GVD HEBO HLG I05A IBBN IDI ISP K06A KBS KEV KIP KMBL KSDI KURK KWP M04C MALT MAUI MBAR MBWA MCK MUN NIKO NWAO PET PMG RAO RAR RER RGN SDPT SMY SNZO STKA SUMG TIP TIR TIRR TRF TUE UNV VLC VOS VSL VSU VTS WRAB YAK YBH YNG



Location of the earthquake (yellow star) and great circle path from the epicenter to each station (red) [created using GMT (Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith, New version of Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS Trans. AGU, 76 329, 1995.)]
The traces were next integrated to ground displacment in meters. Finally waveforms were cut from 30 seconds before to 140 seconds after the P arrival so that the direct P wave, pP and perhaps the sP are included.

The source inversion is a multipass operation since a lower frequency filter band is used for larger earthquakes and since a search is made over depth. Up to three passed of the outer loop are made, after which the moment magnitude is determined and filter settings readjusted. The inner loop over depth samples all depths from 0 to 800 km with 5 km increments in depth to 50 km, followed by 10 km depth sampling for the remaining range.

The following filter ranges are used according to the moment magnitude Mw:

   FILTER_BAND   FH(s)  FL(s)
       1           60     12      Mw < 6.4
       2          100     20      6.4 < Mw <= 6.9
       3          120     40      Mw > 6.9

For this data set the favored solution is

WVFMTD96   30.0   76.   81.  160.   6.09     0.017 0.178E-05     0.083     0.137 0.631E-06  25.0

The following figures show the sensitivity of the goodness of fit parameter so source depth, the waveform comparison as a function of epicentral distance in degrees and the source to station azimuth

Depth Sensitivity

Goodness of fit as a function of source depth. The measure is 1 - SUM (o -p)2 / SUM o2. A value of 1.0 is the best fit. The best double couple mechanism for the solution depth is plotted above goodness of fit value to indicate how the mefhanism may change with depth.

Fit with Distance

Comparison of the observed traces (red) and solution predicted traces (blue) as a function of epicentral distance in degrees (D). For ease of comparison, the time axis is T - p D, where p is 5.0 seconds/degree and T is the actual travel time. The traces are annotated with the station name at the top.

Fit with Azimuth

Comparison of the observed traces (red) and solution predicted traces (blue) as a function of source to station azimuth in degrees (D). The purpose of this display is to highlight the azimuthal dependence on the first motion. The traces are annotated with the station name at the top.

Inversion Details

Output of wvfmtd96 for the best depth..

Last Changed Tue Apr 4 01:58:17 UTC 2006