Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is nc75412157 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc75412157/executive.

2026/08/05 22:21:57 40.019 -123.452 4.5 4.4 California

Focal Mechanism

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2026/08/05 22:21:57.0 40.02 -123.45 4.5 4.4 California Stations used: BK.ADAM BK.BARR BK.BEVN BK.BIGM BK.BJES BK.BLAS BK.BONV BK.BRIC BK.DCMP BK.DLIK BK.DMOR BK.ETSL BK.GALB BK.GASB BK.GCKB BK.GHOP BK.GRPK BK.GTSB BK.GUMB BK.HALS BK.HAYF BK.HOPS BK.HULL BK.HUNT BK.JCC BK.JEWT BK.KNEE BK.KRUG BK.LCOW BK.LSIB BK.MNDO BK.ORRS BK.PETL BK.PETY BK.PRDS BK.PWAY BK.PWOD BK.RBOW BK.RVIT BK.SAGE BK.SCOT BK.SHWD BK.SPRL BK.SUGR BK.THOM BK.TRIN BK.USAL BK.WEAV BK.WLKR BK.WTWN NC.GHGB NC.GRT NC.GSX NC.KBL NC.KCT NC.KHBB NC.KHMB NC.KNR NC.KZE NC.LDBB NC.LDH NC.LRD NC.LTC NC.NMTB NC.NWH Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.38e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.47 Z = 12 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 329 76 -164 NP2 235 75 -15 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.38e+22 0 102 N 0.00e+00 69 11 P -6.38e+22 21 192 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -5.04e+22 Mxy -2.42e+22 Mxz 2.09e+22 Myy 5.87e+22 Myz 4.87e+21 Mzz -8.26e+21 -------------- #--------------------- ######---------------------- #########--------------------- #############--------------------- ###############--------------####### ##################-------############# ####################---################# ####################-################### ##################------################## ################---------################# ##############------------############## ###########----------------############# T #########------------------############ #######---------------------############ ####-----------------------########### ##-------------------------######### ---------------------------####### ---------- ------------##### --------- P ------------#### ------ ------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -8.26e+21 2.09e+22 -4.87e+21 2.09e+22 -5.04e+22 2.42e+22 -4.87e+21 2.42e+22 5.87e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20260805222157/index.html

Preferred Solution

      STK = 235
      DIP = 75
     RAKE = -15
       MW = 4.47
       HS = 12.0

The NDK file is 20260805222157.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.

SLU	USGSMWR	UCB
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2026/08/05 22:21:57.0 40.02 -123.45 4.5 4.4 California Stations used: BK.ADAM BK.BARR BK.BEVN BK.BIGM BK.BJES BK.BLAS BK.BONV BK.BRIC BK.DCMP BK.DLIK BK.DMOR BK.ETSL BK.GALB BK.GASB BK.GCKB BK.GHOP BK.GRPK BK.GTSB BK.GUMB BK.HALS BK.HAYF BK.HOPS BK.HULL BK.HUNT BK.JCC BK.JEWT BK.KNEE BK.KRUG BK.LCOW BK.LSIB BK.MNDO BK.ORRS BK.PETL BK.PETY BK.PRDS BK.PWAY BK.PWOD BK.RBOW BK.RVIT BK.SAGE BK.SCOT BK.SHWD BK.SPRL BK.SUGR BK.THOM BK.TRIN BK.USAL BK.WEAV BK.WLKR BK.WTWN NC.GHGB NC.GRT NC.GSX NC.KBL NC.KCT NC.KHBB NC.KHMB NC.KNR NC.KZE NC.LDBB NC.LDH NC.LRD NC.LTC NC.NMTB NC.NWH Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.38e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.47 Z = 12 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 329 76 -164 NP2 235 75 -15 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.38e+22 0 102 N 0.00e+00 69 11 P -6.38e+22 21 192 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -5.04e+22 Mxy -2.42e+22 Mxz 2.09e+22 Myy 5.87e+22 Myz 4.87e+21 Mzz -8.26e+21 -------------- #--------------------- ######---------------------- #########--------------------- #############--------------------- ###############--------------####### ##################-------############# ####################---################# ####################-################### ##################------################## ################---------################# ##############------------############## ###########----------------############# T #########------------------############ #######---------------------############ ####-----------------------########### ##-------------------------######### ---------------------------####### ---------- ------------##### --------- P ------------#### ------ ------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -8.26e+21 2.09e+22 -4.87e+21 2.09e+22 -5.04e+22 2.42e+22 -4.87e+21 2.42e+22 5.87e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20260805222157/index.html	Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 6.466e+15 N-m Magnitude 4.47 Mwr Depth 13.0 km Percent DC 83% Half Duration - Catalog US Data Source US Contributor US Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 143 86 -173 NP2 53 83 -4 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.726e+15 2 278 N -0.555e+15 82 175 P -6.171e+15 8 8	Moment Tensor (Mw) Moment 4.887e+15 N-m Magnitude 4.39 Mw Depth 5.0 km Percent DC 99% Half Duration - Catalog NC Data Source NC Contributor NC Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 328 72 -163 NP2 233 74 -19 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 4.872e+15 1 281 N 0.029e+15 66 14 P -4.902e+15 24 190

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and M_L by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for M_L is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined M_L. The defined M_L uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

ML Magnitude

Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Map showing station locations used for computing the ML's. No distinction is made whether the vertical (Z) or horizontal (H) components were used.

Context

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.

Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   230    85     0   3.92 0.2210
WVFGRD96    2.0   235    85     5   4.08 0.3147
WVFGRD96    3.0   235    75    15   4.16 0.3500
WVFGRD96    4.0   230    75   -25   4.21 0.3796
WVFGRD96    5.0   230    75   -30   4.26 0.4205
WVFGRD96    6.0   230    70   -25   4.30 0.4599
WVFGRD96    7.0   230    70   -20   4.33 0.4924
WVFGRD96    8.0   230    70   -25   4.39 0.5242
WVFGRD96    9.0   230    70   -20   4.41 0.5460
WVFGRD96   10.0   230    70   -20   4.43 0.5590
WVFGRD96   11.0   235    75   -15   4.45 0.5675
WVFGRD96   12.0   235    75   -15   4.47 0.5714
WVFGRD96   13.0   235    80   -10   4.49 0.5713
WVFGRD96   14.0   235    80   -10   4.51 0.5675
WVFGRD96   15.0   235    80   -10   4.52 0.5604
WVFGRD96   16.0   235    80   -10   4.53 0.5509
WVFGRD96   17.0   235    80   -10   4.54 0.5396
WVFGRD96   18.0   235    80   -10   4.55 0.5265
WVFGRD96   19.0   235    80   -10   4.56 0.5126
WVFGRD96   20.0   235    80   -10   4.56 0.4987
WVFGRD96   21.0   235    80   -10   4.57 0.4840
WVFGRD96   22.0   235    80     5   4.57 0.4696
WVFGRD96   23.0   235    80     5   4.57 0.4552
WVFGRD96   24.0   235    80     5   4.58 0.4404
WVFGRD96   25.0   235    80     5   4.58 0.4257
WVFGRD96   26.0   235    80     5   4.58 0.4117
WVFGRD96   27.0   235    80    10   4.58 0.3980
WVFGRD96   28.0   235    80    10   4.58 0.3855
WVFGRD96   29.0    55    90   -10   4.58 0.3723

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   12.0   235    75   -15   4.47 0.5714

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is

Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 

Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

• The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
• The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
• The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion (assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the P arrival time)

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00