Location
Location ANSS
The ANSS event ID is uw714040221 and the event page is at
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/uw714040221/executive.
2026/07/02 06:35:47 48.287 -122.609 25.3 3.8 Washington
Focal Mechanism
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2026/07/02 06:35:47.0 48.29 -122.61 25.3 3.8 Washington
Stations used:
CC.ELBE CN.CLRS CN.GOBB CN.MGRB CN.NLLB CN.PABB CN.PGC
US.NLWA UW.BHAM UW.BHW UW.CHIMA UW.DONK UW.EPH2 UW.EQUIL
UW.GNW UW.GUEM UW.HDW UW.HILL UW.HTW UW.KALA UW.KTSAP
UW.LON UW.LOPEZ UW.LTY UW.LUMI UW.MORSE UW.MULN UW.NATEM
UW.ODEER UW.OLGA UW.PAN4H UW.PASS UW.RNWY UW.SAXON UW.SHUK
UW.STOR UW.TOLT UW.TURTL UW.TWISP UW.WATCH
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 2.40e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.52
Z = 22 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 279 71 114
NP2 45 30 40
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 2.40e+21 57 221
N 0.00e+00 23 91
P -2.40e+21 23 351
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.59e+21
Mxy 6.68e+20
Mxz -1.67e+21
Myy 2.51e+20
Myz -5.80e+20
Mzz 1.34e+21
--------------
------- ------------
---------- P ---------------
----------- ----------------
---------------------------------#
----------------------------------##
------------------------------------##
-------------------------------------###
----#################----------------###
##############################--------####
###################################---####
#####################################-####
####################################-----#
############# ###################-----
############# T ##################------
############ ################-------
#############################-------
##########################--------
#####################---------
--##############------------
----------------------
--------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
1.34e+21 -1.67e+21 5.80e+20
-1.67e+21 -1.59e+21 -6.68e+20
5.80e+20 -6.68e+20 2.51e+20
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20260702063547/index.html
|
Preferred Solution
The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is
STK = 45
DIP = 30
RAKE = 40
MW = 3.52
HS = 22.0
The NDK file is 20260702063547.ndk
The waveform inversion is preferred.
Moment Tensor Comparison
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
| SLU |
UW |
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2026/07/02 06:35:47.0 48.29 -122.61 25.3 3.8 Washington
Stations used:
CC.ELBE CN.CLRS CN.GOBB CN.MGRB CN.NLLB CN.PABB CN.PGC
US.NLWA UW.BHAM UW.BHW UW.CHIMA UW.DONK UW.EPH2 UW.EQUIL
UW.GNW UW.GUEM UW.HDW UW.HILL UW.HTW UW.KALA UW.KTSAP
UW.LON UW.LOPEZ UW.LTY UW.LUMI UW.MORSE UW.MULN UW.NATEM
UW.ODEER UW.OLGA UW.PAN4H UW.PASS UW.RNWY UW.SAXON UW.SHUK
UW.STOR UW.TOLT UW.TURTL UW.TWISP UW.WATCH
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 2.40e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.52
Z = 22 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 279 71 114
NP2 45 30 40
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 2.40e+21 57 221
N 0.00e+00 23 91
P -2.40e+21 23 351
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.59e+21
Mxy 6.68e+20
Mxz -1.67e+21
Myy 2.51e+20
Myz -5.80e+20
Mzz 1.34e+21
--------------
------- ------------
---------- P ---------------
----------- ----------------
---------------------------------#
----------------------------------##
------------------------------------##
-------------------------------------###
----#################----------------###
##############################--------####
###################################---####
#####################################-####
####################################-----#
############# ###################-----
############# T ##################------
############ ################-------
#############################-------
##########################--------
#####################---------
--##############------------
----------------------
--------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
1.34e+21 -1.67e+21 5.80e+20
-1.67e+21 -1.59e+21 -6.68e+20
5.80e+20 -6.68e+20 2.51e+20
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20260702063547/index.html
|
PNSN First motion focal mechanism
|
Magnitudes
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula
for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
ML Magnitude
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Map showing station locations used for computing the ML's. No distinction is made whether the vertical (Z) or horizontal (H) components were used.
Context
The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.
Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the
stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 280 45 85 3.17 0.3221
WVFGRD96 2.0 100 45 90 3.30 0.4230
WVFGRD96 3.0 100 40 90 3.34 0.3706
WVFGRD96 4.0 45 15 30 3.43 0.3911
WVFGRD96 5.0 50 10 45 3.44 0.4723
WVFGRD96 6.0 55 10 50 3.42 0.5198
WVFGRD96 7.0 50 15 45 3.40 0.5445
WVFGRD96 8.0 50 15 45 3.47 0.5600
WVFGRD96 9.0 50 15 45 3.45 0.5769
WVFGRD96 10.0 45 20 40 3.45 0.5895
WVFGRD96 11.0 45 20 40 3.44 0.6010
WVFGRD96 12.0 45 25 45 3.45 0.6107
WVFGRD96 13.0 50 25 50 3.46 0.6202
WVFGRD96 14.0 45 25 45 3.46 0.6279
WVFGRD96 15.0 45 30 45 3.47 0.6353
WVFGRD96 16.0 45 30 40 3.47 0.6416
WVFGRD96 17.0 45 30 40 3.47 0.6473
WVFGRD96 18.0 45 30 40 3.48 0.6515
WVFGRD96 19.0 50 30 45 3.49 0.6550
WVFGRD96 20.0 45 30 40 3.50 0.6574
WVFGRD96 21.0 45 30 40 3.51 0.6594
WVFGRD96 22.0 45 30 40 3.52 0.6603
WVFGRD96 23.0 45 30 40 3.53 0.6597
WVFGRD96 24.0 45 30 40 3.54 0.6584
WVFGRD96 25.0 45 30 40 3.55 0.6559
WVFGRD96 26.0 45 30 40 3.55 0.6527
WVFGRD96 27.0 45 30 40 3.56 0.6485
WVFGRD96 28.0 45 30 40 3.57 0.6433
WVFGRD96 29.0 45 30 40 3.58 0.6372
WVFGRD96 30.0 45 30 40 3.59 0.6304
WVFGRD96 31.0 45 30 40 3.59 0.6228
WVFGRD96 32.0 55 25 45 3.59 0.6155
WVFGRD96 33.0 45 30 40 3.61 0.6081
WVFGRD96 34.0 45 30 40 3.61 0.6008
WVFGRD96 35.0 45 30 40 3.62 0.5931
WVFGRD96 36.0 45 30 40 3.63 0.5847
WVFGRD96 37.0 45 30 40 3.63 0.5768
WVFGRD96 38.0 45 30 40 3.64 0.5687
WVFGRD96 39.0 45 30 40 3.64 0.5607
WVFGRD96 40.0 45 25 40 3.77 0.5583
WVFGRD96 41.0 45 25 40 3.78 0.5513
WVFGRD96 42.0 45 25 40 3.78 0.5440
WVFGRD96 43.0 45 25 40 3.79 0.5365
WVFGRD96 44.0 45 25 40 3.80 0.5292
WVFGRD96 45.0 55 25 50 3.80 0.5215
WVFGRD96 46.0 45 30 40 3.81 0.5144
WVFGRD96 47.0 45 30 40 3.82 0.5072
WVFGRD96 48.0 45 30 40 3.82 0.4999
WVFGRD96 49.0 45 30 40 3.83 0.4927
WVFGRD96 50.0 45 30 40 3.83 0.4850
WVFGRD96 51.0 45 30 40 3.84 0.4777
WVFGRD96 52.0 35 30 30 3.84 0.4711
WVFGRD96 53.0 35 30 25 3.85 0.4657
WVFGRD96 54.0 30 35 25 3.86 0.4609
WVFGRD96 55.0 30 35 25 3.87 0.4557
WVFGRD96 56.0 30 35 25 3.87 0.4511
WVFGRD96 57.0 30 35 25 3.88 0.4463
WVFGRD96 58.0 30 35 20 3.88 0.4417
WVFGRD96 59.0 30 35 20 3.89 0.4370
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 22.0 45 30 40 3.52 0.6603
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted.
Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off.
A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
|
|
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.
|
|
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms.
Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.
|
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
- The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
- The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
- The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the
same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion
(assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the
P arrival time)
Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Velocity Model
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows
(The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Last Changed Thu Jul 2 09:00:28 CDT 2026
