Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is us7000ssvm and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000ssvm/executive.

2026/06/14 17:41:00 34.470 -106.770 10.0 3.8 New Mexico

Focal Mechanism

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2026/06/14 17:41:00.0 34.47 -106.77 10.0 3.8 New Mexico Stations used: AE.319A AE.HANNA AE.TONTO AE.W18A AE.X18A C0.S22A GM.NMP01 GM.NMP02 GM.NMP25 GM.NMP44 GM.NMP45 IU.ANMO N4.MSTX SC.121A SC.Y22D TX.PB11 TX.PB28 TX.PB40 US.MNTX YX.UNM2 YX.UNM5 Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 7.24e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.84 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 353 48 -109 NP2 200 45 -70 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 7.24e+21 2 96 N 0.00e+00 14 6 P -7.24e+21 76 193 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.30e+20 Mxy -8.46e+20 Mxz 1.65e+21 Myy 7.14e+21 Myz 5.99e+20 Mzz -6.81e+21 #######------# ############-######### ############------########## ###########----------######### ###########-------------########## ###########---------------########## ###########-----------------########## ###########------------------########### ##########--------------------########## ##########---------------------########### ##########---------------------########### #########---------- ----------######## #########---------- P ----------######## T ########---------- ----------######## ########----------------------########## #######----------------------######### ######----------------------######## ######--------------------######## ####-------------------####### ####-----------------####### ##---------------##### -----------### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -6.81e+21 1.65e+21 -5.99e+20 1.65e+21 -3.30e+20 8.46e+20 -5.99e+20 8.46e+20 7.14e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20260614174100/index.html

Preferred Solution

      STK = 200
      DIP = 45
     RAKE = -70
       MW = 3.84
       HS = 11.0

The NDK file is 20260614174100.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.

SLU

USGSMWR

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2026/06/14 17:41:00.0 34.47 -106.77 10.0 3.8 New Mexico Stations used: AE.319A AE.HANNA AE.TONTO AE.W18A AE.X18A C0.S22A GM.NMP01 GM.NMP02 GM.NMP25 GM.NMP44 GM.NMP45 IU.ANMO N4.MSTX SC.121A SC.Y22D TX.PB11 TX.PB28 TX.PB40 US.MNTX YX.UNM2 YX.UNM5 Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 7.24e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.84 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 353 48 -109 NP2 200 45 -70 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 7.24e+21 2 96 N 0.00e+00 14 6 P -7.24e+21 76 193 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.30e+20 Mxy -8.46e+20 Mxz 1.65e+21 Myy 7.14e+21 Myz 5.99e+20 Mzz -6.81e+21 #######------# ############-######### ############------########## ###########----------######### ###########-------------########## ###########---------------########## ###########-----------------########## ###########------------------########### ##########--------------------########## ##########---------------------########### ##########---------------------########### #########---------- ----------######## #########---------- P ----------######## T ########---------- ----------######## ########----------------------########## #######----------------------######### ######----------------------######## ######--------------------######## ####-------------------####### ####-----------------####### ##---------------##### -----------### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -6.81e+21 1.65e+21 -5.99e+20 1.65e+21 -3.30e+20 8.46e+20 -5.99e+20 8.46e+20 7.14e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20260614174100/index.html

Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 8.486e+14 N-m Magnitude 3.89 Mwr Depth 12.0 km Percent DC 98% Half Duration - Catalog US Data Source US Contributor US Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 351 34 -103 NP2 186 57 -81 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 8.451e+14 11 270 N 0.069e+14 7 2 P -8.520e+14 76 124

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and M_L by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for M_L is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined M_L. The defined M_L uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

ML Magnitude

Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Map showing station locations used for computing the ML's. No distinction is made whether the vertical (Z) or horizontal (H) components were used.

Context

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.

Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.06 n 3 

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0    60    90   -10   3.43 0.2723
WVFGRD96    2.0   235    90    15   3.49 0.2861
WVFGRD96    3.0    55    80   -45   3.64 0.3129
WVFGRD96    4.0   220    35   -35   3.70 0.3602
WVFGRD96    5.0   215    40   -45   3.71 0.4004
WVFGRD96    6.0   210    45   -55   3.74 0.4302
WVFGRD96    7.0   205    45   -60   3.75 0.4556
WVFGRD96    8.0   205    40   -60   3.81 0.4702
WVFGRD96    9.0   205    45   -65   3.83 0.4899
WVFGRD96   10.0   200    45   -70   3.84 0.5022
WVFGRD96   11.0   200    45   -70   3.84 0.5039
WVFGRD96   12.0   195    45   -75   3.84 0.4995
WVFGRD96   13.0   200    50   -65   3.82 0.4921
WVFGRD96   14.0   200    50   -65   3.82 0.4811
WVFGRD96   15.0   240    50    45   3.75 0.4700
WVFGRD96   16.0   240    50    50   3.75 0.4603
WVFGRD96   17.0   235    55    40   3.75 0.4505
WVFGRD96   18.0   235    55    40   3.75 0.4399
WVFGRD96   19.0   235    55    40   3.76 0.4286
WVFGRD96   20.0   235    60    35   3.76 0.4187
WVFGRD96   21.0   235    60    35   3.77 0.4084
WVFGRD96   22.0   235    60    35   3.77 0.3987
WVFGRD96   23.0   235    60    35   3.78 0.3887
WVFGRD96   24.0   235    60    35   3.78 0.3785
WVFGRD96   25.0   235    65    30   3.79 0.3694
WVFGRD96   26.0   235    65    25   3.79 0.3602
WVFGRD96   27.0   235    65    30   3.80 0.3524
WVFGRD96   28.0   235    65    30   3.80 0.3435
WVFGRD96   29.0   235    70    20   3.81 0.3354

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   11.0   200    45   -70   3.84 0.5039

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is

Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.06 n 3 

Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

• The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
• The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
• The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion (assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the P arrival time)

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00