The ANSS event ID is ak025cry2ji8 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak025cry2ji8/executive.
2025/10/05 11:20:03 61.366 -140.546 13.3 4.6 Yukon, Canada
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2025/10/05 11:20:03.0 61.37 -140.55 13.3 4.6 Yukon, Canada
Stations used:
AK.BAE AK.BARN AK.BERG AK.BESE AK.BMR AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.DOT
AK.EYAK AK.FID AK.GLB AK.GLI AK.HARP AK.HIN AK.ISLE AK.J25K
AK.K24K AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.L26K AK.LOGN AK.M26K AK.MCAR
AK.MESA AK.P23K AK.PAX AK.PIN AK.PWL AK.RAG AK.RIDG AK.SCRK
AK.TGL AK.VRDI AK.WAT6 AK.WAX CN.DAWY CN.HYT CN.PLBC CN.WHY
NY.MAYO
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.04e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.61
Z = 11 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 117 75 138
NP2 220 50 20
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.04e+23 40 70
N 0.00e+00 46 280
P -1.04e+23 16 174
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -8.78e+22
Mxy 3.01e+22
Mxz 4.39e+22
Myy 5.29e+22
Myz 4.49e+22
Mzz 3.49e+22
--------------
----------------------
---------------------#######
-----------------#############
---------------###################
--------------######################
#------------#########################
####--------################## #######
######-----################### T #######
#########--#################### ########
##########--##############################
#########------###########################
########----------########################
######---------------###################
######-------------------###############
#####-------------------------########
####--------------------------------
###-------------------------------
#-----------------------------
#-------------- ----------
------------ P -------
-------- ---
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
3.49e+22 4.39e+22 -4.49e+22
4.39e+22 -8.78e+22 -3.01e+22
-4.49e+22 -3.01e+22 5.29e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20251005112003/index.html
|
STK = 220
DIP = 50
RAKE = 20
MW = 4.61
HS = 11.0
The NDK file is 20251005112003.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 210 50 -10 4.48 0.5018
WVFGRD96 2.0 205 55 -30 4.51 0.5243
WVFGRD96 3.0 215 45 -5 4.52 0.5414
WVFGRD96 4.0 220 45 5 4.52 0.5747
WVFGRD96 5.0 220 50 10 4.53 0.6055
WVFGRD96 6.0 220 50 15 4.54 0.6333
WVFGRD96 7.0 220 50 15 4.55 0.6557
WVFGRD96 8.0 220 50 15 4.55 0.6719
WVFGRD96 9.0 220 55 15 4.57 0.6842
WVFGRD96 10.0 220 50 20 4.60 0.6925
WVFGRD96 11.0 220 50 20 4.61 0.6964
WVFGRD96 12.0 225 50 25 4.62 0.6961
WVFGRD96 13.0 225 50 25 4.62 0.6930
WVFGRD96 14.0 225 50 25 4.63 0.6870
WVFGRD96 15.0 225 50 20 4.64 0.6788
WVFGRD96 16.0 225 50 20 4.64 0.6688
WVFGRD96 17.0 225 50 20 4.65 0.6574
WVFGRD96 18.0 220 50 15 4.66 0.6454
WVFGRD96 19.0 220 50 15 4.66 0.6327
WVFGRD96 20.0 225 45 20 4.69 0.6214
WVFGRD96 21.0 225 45 20 4.70 0.6084
WVFGRD96 22.0 225 45 20 4.70 0.5949
WVFGRD96 23.0 225 45 20 4.71 0.5814
WVFGRD96 24.0 225 45 20 4.72 0.5675
WVFGRD96 25.0 225 45 20 4.72 0.5539
WVFGRD96 26.0 225 45 20 4.73 0.5403
WVFGRD96 27.0 225 45 20 4.73 0.5266
WVFGRD96 28.0 225 45 20 4.74 0.5138
WVFGRD96 29.0 225 45 20 4.74 0.5005
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 11.0 220 50 20 4.61 0.6964
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.0000 5.0000 2.8900 2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 9.0000 6.1000 3.5200 2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.0000 6.4000 3.7000 2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 20.0000 6.7000 3.8700 2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 8.1500 4.7000 3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00