The ANSS event ID is nn00903530 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nn00903530/executive.
2025/08/31 08:49:34 41.224 -116.709 9.3 3.9 Nevada
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2025/08/31 08:49:34.0 41.22 -116.71 9.3 3.9 Nevada
Stations used:
BK.BIGV BK.EAGL BK.MNLT BK.MZTA BK.RAVE BK.YUBA IM.NV31
IW.MFID IW.PLID NC.AFD NC.LDH NN.BEK NN.DIX NN.KVN NN.PNT
NN.Q09A NN.R11B NN.WAK NN.YER UO.ADEL UO.JAZZ UO.PRONG
US.BMO US.DUG US.ELK US.HLID US.HWUT US.WVOR UU.BGU UU.CTU
UU.FOR1 UU.FSU UU.HDUT UU.MOUT UU.SPU UW.IRON UW.TREE
WW.CNCL WW.CTNW WW.IRMR
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +60
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.04 n 3
lp c 0.07 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.32e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.69
Z = 9 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 250 50 -70
NP2 40 44 -112
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.32e+21 3 326
N 0.00e+00 15 57
P -4.32e+21 74 225
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 2.80e+21
Mxy -2.15e+21
Mxz 9.86e+20
Myy 1.19e+21
Myz 6.51e+20
Mzz -3.99e+21
##############
T ####################
## #######################
#############################-
################################--
#################---------------#---
#############---------------------###-
###########------------------------#####
########---------------------------#####
#######----------------------------#######
#####------------------------------#######
####------------- --------------########
###-------------- P -------------#########
#--------------- ------------#########
#-----------------------------##########
---------------------------###########
------------------------############
---------------------#############
----------------##############
----------##################
######################
##############
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-3.99e+21 9.86e+20 -6.51e+20
9.86e+20 2.80e+21 2.15e+21
-6.51e+20 2.15e+21 1.19e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20250831084934/index.html
|
STK = 250
DIP = 50
RAKE = -70
MW = 3.69
HS = 9.0
The NDK file is 20250831084934.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.04 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 275 70 10 3.32 0.4117
WVFGRD96 2.0 280 55 15 3.43 0.4582
WVFGRD96 3.0 105 35 20 3.54 0.4882
WVFGRD96 4.0 105 40 15 3.52 0.5110
WVFGRD96 5.0 270 45 -25 3.53 0.5412
WVFGRD96 6.0 255 50 -60 3.60 0.5845
WVFGRD96 7.0 255 50 -60 3.62 0.6149
WVFGRD96 8.0 250 50 -70 3.68 0.6322
WVFGRD96 9.0 250 50 -70 3.69 0.6387
WVFGRD96 10.0 255 50 -60 3.68 0.6242
WVFGRD96 11.0 260 55 -50 3.66 0.6030
WVFGRD96 12.0 265 60 -40 3.65 0.5791
WVFGRD96 13.0 270 65 -35 3.65 0.5552
WVFGRD96 14.0 270 65 -30 3.65 0.5319
WVFGRD96 15.0 270 70 -30 3.66 0.5078
WVFGRD96 16.0 270 70 -25 3.66 0.4839
WVFGRD96 17.0 275 70 -25 3.66 0.4609
WVFGRD96 18.0 275 75 -25 3.66 0.4393
WVFGRD96 19.0 275 75 -20 3.66 0.4183
WVFGRD96 20.0 280 75 20 3.66 0.3951
WVFGRD96 21.0 280 75 20 3.67 0.3776
WVFGRD96 22.0 280 75 20 3.67 0.3604
WVFGRD96 23.0 280 75 20 3.67 0.3439
WVFGRD96 24.0 280 75 20 3.68 0.3278
WVFGRD96 25.0 280 75 20 3.68 0.3127
WVFGRD96 26.0 280 75 20 3.68 0.2978
WVFGRD96 27.0 280 75 20 3.68 0.2843
WVFGRD96 28.0 280 75 20 3.69 0.2710
WVFGRD96 29.0 280 80 20 3.69 0.2589
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 9.0 250 50 -70 3.69 0.6387
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.04 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00