The ANSS event ID is ak0253i27mye and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak0253i27mye/executive.
2025/03/17 22:45:40 63.105 -151.373 3.9 4.1 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2025/03/17 22:45:40:0 63.10 -151.37 3.9 4.1 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.BAE AK.BMR AK.BPAW AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.CUT AK.DIV AK.DOT
AK.EYAK AK.FID AK.G23K AK.GCSA AK.GHO AK.GLB AK.H22K
AK.H24K AK.HARP AK.HDA AK.HIN AK.I21K AK.I23K AK.J20K
AK.J25K AK.K24K AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.L19K AK.L22K AK.M26K
AK.MCK AK.MLY AK.N18K AK.NEA2 AK.O19K AK.PAX AK.POKR AK.PPD
AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SLK AK.SSN
AK.SWD AK.WRH AT.PMR AV.RED AV.STLK IM.IL31 IU.COLA
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.06e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.95
Z = 14 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 185 50 60
NP2 47 48 121
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.06e+22 67 28
N 0.00e+00 23 205
P -1.06e+22 1 296
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -7.73e+20
Mxy 4.78e+21
Mxz 3.25e+21
Myy -8.26e+21
Myz 1.88e+21
Mzz 9.03e+21
-------#######
--------##############
----------##################
---------#####################
----------#######################-
---------########################--
P ---------########################---
--------########## ###########-----
-----------########## T ###########-----
-----------########### ##########-------
-----------#######################--------
-----------######################---------
-----------#####################----------
----------####################----------
----------##################------------
----------###############-------------
---------#############--------------
---------#########----------------
--------####------------------
########--------------------
######----------------
####----------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
9.03e+21 3.25e+21 -1.88e+21
3.25e+21 -7.73e+20 -4.78e+21
-1.88e+21 -4.78e+21 -8.26e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20250317224540/index.html
|
STK = 185
DIP = 50
RAKE = 60
MW = 3.95
HS = 14.0
The NDK file is 20250317224540.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 80 45 -90 3.53 0.2834
WVFGRD96 2.0 85 45 -85 3.66 0.3421
WVFGRD96 3.0 330 25 -30 3.69 0.2727
WVFGRD96 4.0 330 25 -25 3.70 0.3403
WVFGRD96 5.0 325 25 -30 3.72 0.3968
WVFGRD96 6.0 325 25 -30 3.73 0.4396
WVFGRD96 7.0 330 30 30 3.75 0.4758
WVFGRD96 8.0 340 25 45 3.84 0.5000
WVFGRD96 9.0 350 25 55 3.86 0.5306
WVFGRD96 10.0 185 45 60 3.89 0.5635
WVFGRD96 11.0 190 50 65 3.92 0.5931
WVFGRD96 12.0 185 50 60 3.93 0.6121
WVFGRD96 13.0 185 50 60 3.94 0.6216
WVFGRD96 14.0 185 50 60 3.95 0.6237
WVFGRD96 15.0 185 50 60 3.96 0.6201
WVFGRD96 16.0 185 50 60 3.97 0.6130
WVFGRD96 17.0 185 50 60 3.98 0.6032
WVFGRD96 18.0 185 50 60 3.99 0.5906
WVFGRD96 19.0 185 50 60 4.00 0.5764
WVFGRD96 20.0 185 50 55 4.01 0.5606
WVFGRD96 21.0 185 50 55 4.02 0.5433
WVFGRD96 22.0 185 50 60 4.03 0.5251
WVFGRD96 23.0 185 50 60 4.03 0.5051
WVFGRD96 24.0 185 50 60 4.04 0.4846
WVFGRD96 25.0 5 45 60 4.04 0.4642
WVFGRD96 26.0 5 45 60 4.04 0.4489
WVFGRD96 27.0 10 45 70 4.05 0.4330
WVFGRD96 28.0 10 45 70 4.05 0.4167
WVFGRD96 29.0 10 45 70 4.06 0.3993
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 14.0 185 50 60 3.95 0.6237
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00