The ANSS event ID is ak0251kaoe6d and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak0251kaoe6d/executive.
2025/02/03 04:03:59 62.162 -153.872 6.3 3.8 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2025/02/03 04:03:59:0 62.16 -153.87 6.3 3.8 Alaska Stations used: AK.BAE AK.BPAW AK.CAPN AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.CUT AK.DIV AK.GCSA AK.H17K AK.HDA AK.J20K AK.K24K AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.L19K AK.L22K AK.M16K AK.M20K AK.MCK AK.N18K AK.NEA2 AK.RND AK.SAW AK.WRH AT.TTA AV.RED IM.IL31 IU.COLA Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 3.63e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.64 Z = 10 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 320 80 -30 NP2 56 61 -168 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 3.63e+21 13 11 N 0.00e+00 59 123 P -3.63e+21 28 274 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 3.31e+21 Mxy 8.43e+20 Mxz 6.78e+20 Myy -2.69e+21 Myz 1.66e+21 Mzz -6.21e+20 ######### ## ############# T ###### -############### ######### -----######################### ---------######################### ------------#######################- ---------------####################--- ------------------##################---- -------------------################----- ---- ---------------############-------- ---- P -----------------#########--------- ---- ------------------######----------- --------------------------####------------ --------------------------#------------- ------------------------####------------ --------------------########---------- ---------------##############------- ##-----######################----- ###########################--- ###########################- ###################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -6.21e+20 6.78e+20 -1.66e+21 6.78e+20 3.31e+21 -8.43e+20 -1.66e+21 -8.43e+20 -2.69e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20250203040359/index.html |
STK = 320 DIP = 80 RAKE = -30 MW = 3.64 HS = 10.0
The NDK file is 20250203040359.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 325 85 -5 3.25 0.2566 WVFGRD96 2.0 325 85 -5 3.40 0.3793 WVFGRD96 3.0 325 80 -10 3.46 0.4190 WVFGRD96 4.0 325 80 -15 3.50 0.4406 WVFGRD96 5.0 325 90 -30 3.54 0.4558 WVFGRD96 6.0 145 90 30 3.56 0.4655 WVFGRD96 7.0 325 65 10 3.57 0.4719 WVFGRD96 8.0 145 90 35 3.62 0.4746 WVFGRD96 9.0 325 90 -30 3.62 0.4763 WVFGRD96 10.0 320 80 -30 3.64 0.4769 WVFGRD96 11.0 320 80 -30 3.65 0.4761 WVFGRD96 12.0 320 80 -30 3.66 0.4745 WVFGRD96 13.0 320 80 -30 3.67 0.4721 WVFGRD96 14.0 320 80 -30 3.68 0.4686 WVFGRD96 15.0 320 75 -25 3.69 0.4642 WVFGRD96 16.0 320 75 -25 3.70 0.4585 WVFGRD96 17.0 320 75 -25 3.71 0.4518 WVFGRD96 18.0 320 75 -25 3.72 0.4441 WVFGRD96 19.0 320 80 -30 3.73 0.4364 WVFGRD96 20.0 320 80 -30 3.74 0.4277 WVFGRD96 21.0 320 80 -30 3.75 0.4183 WVFGRD96 22.0 320 80 -30 3.75 0.4082 WVFGRD96 23.0 320 80 -30 3.76 0.3975 WVFGRD96 24.0 315 75 -35 3.77 0.3868 WVFGRD96 25.0 315 75 -35 3.78 0.3766 WVFGRD96 26.0 315 75 -35 3.78 0.3662 WVFGRD96 27.0 315 75 -35 3.78 0.3556 WVFGRD96 28.0 315 75 -35 3.79 0.3447 WVFGRD96 29.0 310 70 -50 3.82 0.3359
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 10.0 320 80 -30 3.64 0.4769
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00