The ANSS event ID is us7000m11m and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000m11m/executive.
2024/02/23 09:47:08 32.636 -104.384 6.1 4.0 New Mexico
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2024/02/23 09:47:08:0 32.64 -104.38 6.1 4.0 New Mexico Stations used: 4O.MID02 GM.NMP01 GM.NMP02 GM.NMP25 GM.NMP41 GM.NMP44 IM.TX31 IU.ANMO N4.MSTX SC.121A SC.Y22A TX.ALPN TX.DKNS TX.MB01 TX.MB08 TX.MNHN TX.ODSA TX.OZNA TX.PB01 TX.PB06 TX.PB11 TX.PB28 TX.PB40 TX.PECS TX.PH02 TX.SAND TX.SN08 TX.VHRN Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.55e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.06 Z = 9 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 321 85 -170 NP2 230 80 -5 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.55e+22 4 95 N 0.00e+00 79 347 P -1.55e+22 11 186 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.47e+22 Mxy -2.87e+21 Mxz 2.69e+21 Myy 1.52e+22 Myz 1.24e+21 Mzz -4.62e+20 -------------- ---------------------- #--------------------------- ####-------------------------- ########----------------------#### ###########-----------------######## ##############------------############ ################--------################ ##################----################## ########################################## ##################----################## ################-------################# T ##############-----------############### ###########--------------############### #########------------------############# #######--------------------########### ####-----------------------######### ##--------------------------###### ---------------------------### ---------------------------# -------- ----------- ---- P ------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -4.62e+20 2.69e+21 -1.24e+21 2.69e+21 -1.47e+22 2.87e+21 -1.24e+21 2.87e+21 1.52e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20240223094708/index.html |
STK = 230 DIP = 80 RAKE = -5 MW = 4.06 HS = 9.0
The NDK file is 20240223094708.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 140 90 10 3.64 0.3295 WVFGRD96 2.0 320 80 -10 3.79 0.4274 WVFGRD96 3.0 140 90 -10 3.84 0.4642 WVFGRD96 4.0 325 85 10 3.89 0.4844 WVFGRD96 5.0 320 85 5 3.92 0.4917 WVFGRD96 6.0 320 85 5 3.95 0.4898 WVFGRD96 7.0 230 85 -5 3.99 0.4941 WVFGRD96 8.0 230 80 -5 4.03 0.5063 WVFGRD96 9.0 230 80 -5 4.06 0.5086 WVFGRD96 10.0 230 80 -5 4.08 0.5061 WVFGRD96 11.0 230 80 -5 4.10 0.5000 WVFGRD96 12.0 230 80 -5 4.12 0.4908 WVFGRD96 13.0 230 85 -5 4.13 0.4798 WVFGRD96 14.0 230 85 -5 4.14 0.4674 WVFGRD96 15.0 230 80 -5 4.15 0.4535 WVFGRD96 16.0 230 75 -5 4.17 0.4407 WVFGRD96 17.0 230 75 -5 4.18 0.4285 WVFGRD96 18.0 230 70 -5 4.19 0.4175 WVFGRD96 19.0 230 65 -5 4.20 0.4071 WVFGRD96 20.0 230 60 -5 4.22 0.4007 WVFGRD96 21.0 230 55 -5 4.24 0.3964 WVFGRD96 22.0 230 55 -5 4.25 0.3937 WVFGRD96 23.0 230 50 -5 4.27 0.3924 WVFGRD96 24.0 230 50 -5 4.28 0.3919 WVFGRD96 25.0 230 45 -5 4.30 0.3922 WVFGRD96 26.0 230 45 -5 4.31 0.3930 WVFGRD96 27.0 230 45 -5 4.32 0.3951 WVFGRD96 28.0 230 45 -5 4.33 0.3985 WVFGRD96 29.0 230 45 -5 4.33 0.3999
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 9.0 230 80 -5 4.06 0.5086
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00