Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated. Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
The ANSS event ID is tx2023kdvg and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/tx2023kdvg/executive.
2023/05/25 09:29:51 31.706 -104.547 6.4 3.5 Texas
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2023/05/25 09:29:51:0 31.71 -104.55 6.4 3.5 Texas
Stations used:
4O.CV01 TX.PB01 TX.PB10 TX.PB11 TX.PB13 TX.PB33 TX.PB34
TX.PB35 TX.PB36 TX.PB38 TX.PB43 TX.PECS TX.VHRN
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.08 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 8.51e+20 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.22
Z = 6 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 60 70 -90
NP2 240 20 -90
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 8.51e+20 25 150
N 0.00e+00 -0 240
P -8.51e+20 65 330
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 4.10e+20
Mxy -2.37e+20
Mxz -5.65e+20
Myy 1.37e+20
Myz 3.26e+20
Mzz -5.47e+20
##############
######################
########-----------------###
#####------------------------#
#####----------------------------#
####--------------------------------
####---------- -------------------##
####----------- P ------------------####
###------------ ----------------######
###------------------------------#########
##-----------------------------###########
##---------------------------#############
##------------------------################
#---------------------##################
#------------------#####################
-------------#########################
-----###############################
####################### ########
##################### T ######
#################### #####
######################
##############
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-5.47e+20 -5.65e+20 -3.26e+20
-5.65e+20 4.10e+20 2.37e+20
-3.26e+20 2.37e+20 1.37e+20
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20230525092951/index.html
|
STK = 60
DIP = 70
RAKE = -90
MW = 3.22
HS = 6.0
The NDK file is 20230525092951.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated.
Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 330 80 10 2.85 0.2906
WVFGRD96 2.0 145 80 -5 2.96 0.3239
WVFGRD96 3.0 280 15 -35 3.19 0.4013
WVFGRD96 4.0 265 15 -55 3.19 0.4809
WVFGRD96 5.0 255 20 -75 3.22 0.5193
WVFGRD96 6.0 60 70 -90 3.22 0.5332
WVFGRD96 7.0 240 25 -95 3.24 0.5310
WVFGRD96 8.0 70 65 -85 3.33 0.5230
WVFGRD96 9.0 60 65 -80 3.31 0.5080
WVFGRD96 10.0 325 50 40 3.32 0.5087
WVFGRD96 11.0 325 50 35 3.33 0.5132
WVFGRD96 12.0 320 55 30 3.36 0.5101
WVFGRD96 13.0 320 55 25 3.36 0.5026
WVFGRD96 14.0 315 60 20 3.39 0.4924
WVFGRD96 15.0 315 60 20 3.41 0.4817
WVFGRD96 16.0 315 60 20 3.42 0.4688
WVFGRD96 17.0 315 60 15 3.41 0.4563
WVFGRD96 18.0 310 65 15 3.47 0.4436
WVFGRD96 19.0 310 65 15 3.48 0.4309
WVFGRD96 20.0 310 65 15 3.49 0.4174
WVFGRD96 21.0 310 65 10 3.48 0.4038
WVFGRD96 22.0 310 65 10 3.49 0.3908
WVFGRD96 23.0 310 60 10 3.48 0.3765
WVFGRD96 24.0 310 60 10 3.48 0.3639
WVFGRD96 25.0 310 60 10 3.49 0.3508
WVFGRD96 26.0 310 60 5 3.48 0.3391
WVFGRD96 27.0 310 55 5 3.47 0.3279
WVFGRD96 28.0 120 50 -50 3.50 0.3205
WVFGRD96 29.0 120 50 -45 3.52 0.3263
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 6.0 60 70 -90 3.22 0.5332
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00