Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is us7000jj9w and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000jj9w/executive.

2023/03/12 03:03:57 44.625 -116.079 12.1 3.7 Idaho

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2023/03/12 03:03:57:0  44.62 -116.08  12.1 3.7 Idaho
 
 Stations used:
   IW.DLMT IW.IMW IW.MFID IW.PLID IW.TPAW MB.JTMT MB.SRMT 
   UO.ADEL UO.FHAC UO.JAZZ UO.PINE UO.WAGON US.BMO US.BOZ 
   US.ELK US.HAWA US.HLID US.MSO US.NEW UW.BRAN UW.CCRK 
   UW.DAVN UW.IRON UW.IZEE UW.KENT UW.LBRT UW.LMONT UW.LNO 
   UW.PHIN UW.TREE UW.TUCA UW.UMAT UW.WOLL UW.YPT WW.BILL 
   WW.TYLR WY.YDD WY.YHB WY.YHL WY.YMR 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.08 n 3 
   br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 4.62e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.71 
  Z  = 14 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      345    60   -45
   NP2      102    52   -141
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   4.62e+21      5      45
    N   0.00e+00     38     138
    P  -4.62e+21     52     309

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     1.61e+21
       Mxy     3.16e+21
       Mxz    -1.16e+21
       Myy     1.23e+21
       Myz     2.00e+21
       Mzz    -2.83e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ---###########                  
                 ---------#############              
              --------------#############            
             -----------------########### T          
           --------------------##########   #        
          ----------------------##############       
         ----------   -----------##############      
        ----------- P ------------##############     
        -----------   -------------#############     
       #---------------------------##############    
       ##---------------------------#############    
       ####-------------------------#############    
       ######-----------------------#############    
        #######----------------------###########     
        ##########-------------------#########--     
         #############---------------#####-----      
          ###########################---------       
           #########################---------        
             #######################-------          
              #####################-------           
                 ##################----              
                     #############-                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
 -2.83e+21  -1.16e+21  -2.00e+21 
 -1.16e+21   1.61e+21  -3.16e+21 
 -2.00e+21  -3.16e+21   1.23e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20230312030357/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is

      STK = 345
      DIP = 60
     RAKE = -45
       MW = 3.71
       HS = 14.0

The NDK file is 20230312030357.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

ML Magnitude


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Context

The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.08 n 3 
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   175    90     5   3.30 0.3466
WVFGRD96    2.0    -5    75   -20   3.44 0.4614
WVFGRD96    3.0   355    80   -45   3.54 0.4758
WVFGRD96    4.0   355    85   -55   3.60 0.5193
WVFGRD96    5.0   350    80   -60   3.63 0.5602
WVFGRD96    6.0   330    65   -75   3.67 0.5912
WVFGRD96    7.0   320    60   -85   3.69 0.6240
WVFGRD96    8.0   320    60   -85   3.74 0.6441
WVFGRD96    9.0   320    55   -85   3.74 0.6644
WVFGRD96   10.0   325    55   -75   3.73 0.6796
WVFGRD96   11.0   330    55   -70   3.73 0.6854
WVFGRD96   12.0   335    55   -60   3.72 0.6869
WVFGRD96   13.0   340    55   -55   3.71 0.6872
WVFGRD96   14.0   345    60   -45   3.71 0.6872
WVFGRD96   15.0   345    60   -45   3.72 0.6869
WVFGRD96   16.0   345    60   -45   3.72 0.6843
WVFGRD96   17.0   345    60   -45   3.73 0.6805
WVFGRD96   18.0   350    65   -40   3.74 0.6766
WVFGRD96   19.0   350    65   -40   3.74 0.6711
WVFGRD96   20.0   350    65   -40   3.75 0.6644
WVFGRD96   21.0   350    65   -40   3.77 0.6584
WVFGRD96   22.0   350    65   -40   3.77 0.6498
WVFGRD96   23.0   350    65   -35   3.78 0.6401
WVFGRD96   24.0   350    65   -35   3.79 0.6297
WVFGRD96   25.0   350    65   -35   3.79 0.6180
WVFGRD96   26.0   350    65   -35   3.80 0.6057
WVFGRD96   27.0   350    65   -35   3.81 0.5932
WVFGRD96   28.0   350    65   -35   3.81 0.5803
WVFGRD96   29.0   350    65   -35   3.82 0.5665

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   14.0   345    60   -45   3.71 0.6872

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.08 n 3 
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
Last Changed Mon Apr 22 10:26:53 PM CDT 2024