Location
Location ANSS
The ANSS event ID is ak022djyj1sr and the event page is at
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak022djyj1sr/executive.
2022/10/22 05:02:35 61.818 -151.101 68.3 4.4 Alaska
Focal Mechanism
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2022/10/22 05:02:35:0 61.82 -151.10 68.3 4.4 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.CAST AK.CUT AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.FID AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.K20K
AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.L19K AK.L20K AK.L22K AK.N19K AK.O19K
AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SLK AK.SSN AT.PMR AV.RED AV.SPCP
AV.STLK
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.08 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.84e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.39
Z = 74 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 185 70 -80
NP2 338 22 -116
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.84e+22 24 267
N 0.00e+00 9 2
P -4.84e+22 64 111
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.14e+21
Mxy 5.12e+21
Mxz 6.05e+21
Myy 3.18e+22
Myz -3.61e+22
Mzz -3.06e+22
#####---######
###########----#######
#############---------######
#############------------#####
##############---------------#####
###############----------------#####
###############------------------#####
################-------------------#####
###############---------------------####
################---------------------#####
#### #########----------------------####
#### T #########---------- ---------####
#### #########---------- P ---------####
###############---------- ---------###
###############---------------------####
##############---------------------###
#############--------------------###
############-------------------###
###########-----------------##
##########----------------##
########-------------#
#####---------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-3.06e+22 6.05e+21 3.61e+22
6.05e+21 -1.14e+21 -5.12e+21
3.61e+22 -5.12e+21 3.18e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20221022050235/index.html
|
Preferred Solution
The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is
STK = 185
DIP = 70
RAKE = -80
MW = 4.39
HS = 74.0
The NDK file is 20221022050235.ndk
The waveform inversion is preferred.
Moment Tensor Comparison
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
| SLU |
USGSMWR |
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2022/10/22 05:02:35:0 61.82 -151.10 68.3 4.4 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.CAST AK.CUT AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.FID AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.K20K
AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.L19K AK.L20K AK.L22K AK.N19K AK.O19K
AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SLK AK.SSN AT.PMR AV.RED AV.SPCP
AV.STLK
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.08 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.84e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.39
Z = 74 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 185 70 -80
NP2 338 22 -116
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.84e+22 24 267
N 0.00e+00 9 2
P -4.84e+22 64 111
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.14e+21
Mxy 5.12e+21
Mxz 6.05e+21
Myy 3.18e+22
Myz -3.61e+22
Mzz -3.06e+22
#####---######
###########----#######
#############---------######
#############------------#####
##############---------------#####
###############----------------#####
###############------------------#####
################-------------------#####
###############---------------------####
################---------------------#####
#### #########----------------------####
#### T #########---------- ---------####
#### #########---------- P ---------####
###############---------- ---------###
###############---------------------####
##############---------------------###
#############--------------------###
############-------------------###
###########-----------------##
##########----------------##
########-------------#
#####---------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-3.06e+22 6.05e+21 3.61e+22
6.05e+21 -1.14e+21 -5.12e+21
3.61e+22 -5.12e+21 3.18e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20221022050235/index.html
|
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr)
Moment 5.377e+15 N-m
Magnitude 4.42 Mwr
Depth 76.0 km
Percent DC 92%
Half Duration -
Catalog US
Data Source US 3
Contributor US 3
Nodal Planes
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 347 21 -98
NP2 175 70 -87
Principal Axes
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 5.270e+15 N-m 25 263
N 0.209e+15 N-m 3 354
P -5.479e+15 N-m 65 91
|
Magnitudes
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula
for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
ML Magnitude
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Context
The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.
Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the
stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.08 n 3
The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 2.0 335 45 90 3.59 0.1931
WVFGRD96 4.0 5 55 -55 3.65 0.2073
WVFGRD96 6.0 35 40 5 3.67 0.2462
WVFGRD96 8.0 25 35 -15 3.76 0.2790
WVFGRD96 10.0 25 40 -20 3.79 0.3020
WVFGRD96 12.0 25 45 -15 3.81 0.3121
WVFGRD96 14.0 25 45 -15 3.83 0.3152
WVFGRD96 16.0 25 45 -15 3.85 0.3147
WVFGRD96 18.0 215 60 40 3.87 0.3148
WVFGRD96 20.0 210 60 35 3.89 0.3206
WVFGRD96 22.0 215 60 40 3.91 0.3253
WVFGRD96 24.0 210 65 35 3.93 0.3294
WVFGRD96 26.0 210 65 35 3.95 0.3322
WVFGRD96 28.0 40 50 35 3.99 0.3358
WVFGRD96 30.0 35 50 30 4.01 0.3391
WVFGRD96 32.0 35 50 25 4.02 0.3398
WVFGRD96 34.0 35 50 20 4.04 0.3435
WVFGRD96 36.0 30 55 20 4.05 0.3500
WVFGRD96 38.0 30 55 20 4.07 0.3565
WVFGRD96 40.0 350 30 -80 4.18 0.3798
WVFGRD96 42.0 160 60 -90 4.21 0.3980
WVFGRD96 44.0 165 60 -90 4.23 0.4129
WVFGRD96 46.0 165 60 -85 4.25 0.4255
WVFGRD96 48.0 175 60 -75 4.27 0.4382
WVFGRD96 50.0 170 65 -85 4.28 0.4574
WVFGRD96 52.0 170 65 -85 4.30 0.4759
WVFGRD96 54.0 175 65 -80 4.31 0.4949
WVFGRD96 56.0 180 65 -75 4.32 0.5129
WVFGRD96 58.0 180 65 -75 4.33 0.5306
WVFGRD96 60.0 180 65 -75 4.34 0.5443
WVFGRD96 62.0 180 65 -75 4.35 0.5552
WVFGRD96 64.0 180 65 -75 4.35 0.5643
WVFGRD96 66.0 180 65 -75 4.36 0.5710
WVFGRD96 68.0 185 65 -75 4.37 0.5758
WVFGRD96 70.0 185 65 -75 4.37 0.5778
WVFGRD96 72.0 185 70 -80 4.39 0.5798
WVFGRD96 74.0 185 70 -80 4.39 0.5816
WVFGRD96 76.0 185 70 -80 4.39 0.5815
WVFGRD96 78.0 185 70 -80 4.40 0.5803
WVFGRD96 80.0 185 70 -80 4.40 0.5778
WVFGRD96 82.0 180 70 -80 4.40 0.5738
WVFGRD96 84.0 185 70 -75 4.40 0.5691
WVFGRD96 86.0 185 70 -75 4.40 0.5627
WVFGRD96 88.0 185 70 -75 4.40 0.5572
WVFGRD96 90.0 185 70 -75 4.40 0.5498
WVFGRD96 92.0 185 70 -75 4.41 0.5432
WVFGRD96 94.0 180 65 -75 4.40 0.5375
WVFGRD96 96.0 180 65 -75 4.40 0.5319
WVFGRD96 98.0 180 65 -70 4.40 0.5272
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 74.0 185 70 -80 4.39 0.5816
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted.
Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off.
A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.08 n 3
|
|
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.
|
|
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms.
Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.
|
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
- The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
- The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
- The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the
same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion
(assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the
P arrival time)
Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Velocity Model
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows
(The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Last Changed Thu Apr 25 02:20:08 AM CDT 2024
