Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is ak022c4o9ui7 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak022c4o9ui7/executive.

2022/09/21 04:02:30 62.927 -150.781 106.3 4.1 Alaska

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2022/09/21 04:02:30:0  62.93 -150.78 106.3 4.1 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BPAW AK.CAST AK.CUT AK.DHY AK.GHO AK.H22K AK.I21K 
   AK.J19K AK.J20K AK.K20K AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.L19K AK.L20K 
   AK.MCK AK.MLY AK.NEA2 AK.PPLA AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.RND 
   AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SKN AK.SLK AK.SSN AT.PMR AV.STLK 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 1.50e+22 dyne-cm
  Mw = 4.05 
  Z  = 108 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1       50    81    87
   NP2      250    10   110
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   1.50e+22     54     316
    N   0.00e+00      3      50
    P  -1.50e+22     36     143

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -3.68e+21
       Mxy     2.23e+21
       Mxz     1.07e+22
       Myy    -1.13e+21
       Myz    -9.25e+21
       Mzz     4.81e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     --------------                  
                 ----###############---              
              ---#######################--           
             --###########################-          
           --##############################-#        
          --##############################----       
         -##########   #################-------      
        --########## T ###############----------     
        -###########   ##############-----------     
       -###########################--------------    
       -#########################----------------    
       -#######################------------------    
       -####################---------------------    
        ##################----------------------     
        ################------------------------     
         ############--------------   ---------      
          ########----------------- P --------       
           ####--------------------   -------        
             ------------------------------          
              ----------------------------           
                 ----------------------              
                     --------------                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  4.81e+21   1.07e+22   9.25e+21 
  1.07e+22  -3.68e+21  -2.23e+21 
  9.25e+21  -2.23e+21  -1.13e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20220921040230/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is

      STK = 250
      DIP = 10
     RAKE = 110
       MW = 4.05
       HS = 108.0

The NDK file is 20220921040230.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

ML Magnitude


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Context

The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    2.0    30    40  -105   3.16 0.1881
WVFGRD96    4.0   255    75   -45   3.19 0.2036
WVFGRD96    6.0    90    75    35   3.23 0.2204
WVFGRD96    8.0   160    50   -25   3.32 0.2413
WVFGRD96   10.0   175    55    20   3.36 0.2560
WVFGRD96   12.0   175    60    25   3.40 0.2658
WVFGRD96   14.0   175    60    25   3.44 0.2680
WVFGRD96   16.0   180    60    30   3.46 0.2678
WVFGRD96   18.0   180    60    30   3.49 0.2666
WVFGRD96   20.0   350    65    15   3.52 0.2666
WVFGRD96   22.0   190    70    25   3.55 0.2697
WVFGRD96   24.0   205    75    25   3.60 0.2721
WVFGRD96   26.0   205    80    25   3.62 0.2729
WVFGRD96   28.0     5    60     0   3.61 0.2745
WVFGRD96   30.0     0    65   -20   3.63 0.2789
WVFGRD96   32.0   355    60   -20   3.65 0.2876
WVFGRD96   34.0   355    60   -20   3.67 0.2977
WVFGRD96   36.0   350    70    10   3.67 0.3135
WVFGRD96   38.0   350    70    15   3.70 0.3277
WVFGRD96   40.0   350    60    15   3.77 0.3445
WVFGRD96   42.0   180    65    35   3.80 0.3438
WVFGRD96   44.0   345    65    -5   3.82 0.3431
WVFGRD96   46.0   180    65    35   3.83 0.3416
WVFGRD96   48.0   175    60    25   3.84 0.3456
WVFGRD96   50.0   175    50    20   3.85 0.3585
WVFGRD96   52.0   175    50    20   3.86 0.3701
WVFGRD96   54.0   175    45    20   3.88 0.3821
WVFGRD96   56.0   170    45    15   3.89 0.3928
WVFGRD96   58.0   160    45    20   3.93 0.4034
WVFGRD96   60.0    30    80    55   3.94 0.4156
WVFGRD96   62.0    35    80    60   3.96 0.4284
WVFGRD96   64.0    35    80    60   3.96 0.4400
WVFGRD96   66.0    35    80    60   3.97 0.4514
WVFGRD96   68.0    35    80    60   3.98 0.4644
WVFGRD96   70.0    35    80    60   3.99 0.4781
WVFGRD96   72.0    40    85    80   4.01 0.4958
WVFGRD96   74.0    40    85    80   4.02 0.5127
WVFGRD96   76.0   230     5    90   4.03 0.5238
WVFGRD96   78.0   235     5   100   4.03 0.5383
WVFGRD96   80.0   240     5   100   4.04 0.5500
WVFGRD96   82.0    45    85    85   4.04 0.5644
WVFGRD96   84.0   245    10   110   4.03 0.5749
WVFGRD96   86.0    45    80    85   4.04 0.5870
WVFGRD96   88.0   245    10   110   4.04 0.5953
WVFGRD96   90.0    45    80    85   4.04 0.6040
WVFGRD96   92.0    45    80    85   4.04 0.6131
WVFGRD96   94.0   245    10   110   4.05 0.6200
WVFGRD96   96.0   245    10   105   4.05 0.6245
WVFGRD96   98.0    45    80    85   4.05 0.6296
WVFGRD96  100.0    45    80    85   4.05 0.6334
WVFGRD96  102.0    45    80    85   4.05 0.6355
WVFGRD96  104.0   250    10   110   4.05 0.6388
WVFGRD96  106.0    45    80    85   4.05 0.6398
WVFGRD96  108.0   250    10   110   4.05 0.6402
WVFGRD96  110.0    45    80    85   4.05 0.6396
WVFGRD96  112.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6384
WVFGRD96  114.0   250    10   110   4.06 0.6383
WVFGRD96  116.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6357
WVFGRD96  118.0   250    10   110   4.06 0.6342
WVFGRD96  120.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6317
WVFGRD96  122.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6278
WVFGRD96  124.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6254
WVFGRD96  126.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6222
WVFGRD96  128.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6189
WVFGRD96  130.0   250    10   110   4.06 0.6166
WVFGRD96  132.0   250    10   110   4.06 0.6115
WVFGRD96  134.0   250    10   110   4.06 0.6070
WVFGRD96  136.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.6015
WVFGRD96  138.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.5973
WVFGRD96  140.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.5918
WVFGRD96  142.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.5877
WVFGRD96  144.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.5818
WVFGRD96  146.0   250    10   110   4.05 0.5766
WVFGRD96  148.0    50    80    85   4.05 0.5722

The best solution is

WVFGRD96  108.0   250    10   110   4.05 0.6402

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
Last Changed Thu Apr 25 12:59:06 AM CDT 2024