The ANSS event ID is ak021gbh4rso and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak021gbh4rso/executive.
2021/12/21 22:42:14 60.124 -153.274 151.2 5.9 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2021/12/21 22:42:14:0 60.12 -153.27 151.2 5.9 Alaska Stations used: AK.CAST AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HIN AK.K20K AK.KNK AK.L18K AK.L20K AK.M16K AK.N15K AK.N18K AK.N19K AK.O18K AK.O19K AK.P16K AK.P17K AK.P23K AK.PWL AK.Q19K AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SKN AK.SLK AK.SWD AT.PMR AV.ACH AV.ILS AV.RED AV.STLK II.KDAK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 7.76e+24 dyne-cm Mw = 5.86 Z = 158 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 75 75 30 NP2 336 61 163 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 7.76e+24 32 299 N 0.00e+00 57 99 P -7.76e+24 9 203 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -5.06e+24 Mxy -5.14e+24 Mxz 2.80e+24 Myy 3.12e+24 Myz -2.55e+24 Mzz 1.94e+24 -------------- ######---------------- ###########----------------- ###############--------------- ##################---------------- #####################--------------- ##### ###############--------------- ###### T ################--------------- ###### #################-------------# ############################----------#### #############################-----######## #############################-############ #########################-----############ #################------------########### -----------------------------########### -----------------------------######### ----------------------------######## ---------------------------####### -------------------------##### ----- ---------------##### -- P ---------------## ------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 1.94e+24 2.80e+24 2.55e+24 2.80e+24 -5.06e+24 5.14e+24 2.55e+24 5.14e+24 3.12e+24 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20211221224214/index.html |
STK = 75 DIP = 75 RAKE = 30 MW = 5.86 HS = 158.0
The NDK file is 20211221224214.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2021/12/21 22:42:14:0 60.12 -153.27 151.2 5.9 Alaska Stations used: AK.CAST AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HIN AK.K20K AK.KNK AK.L18K AK.L20K AK.M16K AK.N15K AK.N18K AK.N19K AK.O18K AK.O19K AK.P16K AK.P17K AK.P23K AK.PWL AK.Q19K AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SKN AK.SLK AK.SWD AT.PMR AV.ACH AV.ILS AV.RED AV.STLK II.KDAK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 7.76e+24 dyne-cm Mw = 5.86 Z = 158 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 75 75 30 NP2 336 61 163 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 7.76e+24 32 299 N 0.00e+00 57 99 P -7.76e+24 9 203 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -5.06e+24 Mxy -5.14e+24 Mxz 2.80e+24 Myy 3.12e+24 Myz -2.55e+24 Mzz 1.94e+24 -------------- ######---------------- ###########----------------- ###############--------------- ##################---------------- #####################--------------- ##### ###############--------------- ###### T ################--------------- ###### #################-------------# ############################----------#### #############################-----######## #############################-############ #########################-----############ #################------------########### -----------------------------########### -----------------------------######### ----------------------------######## ---------------------------####### -------------------------##### ----- ---------------##### -- P ---------------## ------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 1.94e+24 2.80e+24 2.55e+24 2.80e+24 -5.06e+24 5.14e+24 2.55e+24 5.14e+24 3.12e+24 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20211221224214/index.html |
W-phase Moment Tensor (Mww) Moment 8.727e+17 N-m Magnitude 5.89 Mww Depth 150.5 km Percent DC 97% Half Duration 2.29 s Catalog US Data Source US 3 Contributor US 3 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 336° 61° 160° NP2 76° 73° 31° Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 8.664e+17 N-m 34° 299° N 0.125e+17 N-m 55° 102° P -8.789e+17 N-m 8° 204° |
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 2.0 330 55 -35 4.89 0.1555 WVFGRD96 4.0 335 85 -15 4.91 0.1702 WVFGRD96 6.0 160 80 25 4.97 0.1821 WVFGRD96 8.0 160 80 30 5.04 0.1955 WVFGRD96 10.0 160 80 30 5.07 0.2039 WVFGRD96 12.0 160 80 25 5.09 0.2075 WVFGRD96 14.0 160 80 25 5.11 0.2092 WVFGRD96 16.0 160 85 25 5.13 0.2094 WVFGRD96 18.0 155 90 25 5.14 0.2083 WVFGRD96 20.0 155 90 25 5.16 0.2049 WVFGRD96 22.0 155 90 25 5.17 0.2007 WVFGRD96 24.0 335 90 -20 5.19 0.1948 WVFGRD96 26.0 335 90 -20 5.20 0.1878 WVFGRD96 28.0 335 90 -20 5.21 0.1795 WVFGRD96 30.0 150 55 -25 5.21 0.1701 WVFGRD96 32.0 150 55 -25 5.22 0.1633 WVFGRD96 34.0 150 55 -25 5.23 0.1546 WVFGRD96 36.0 150 55 -20 5.24 0.1446 WVFGRD96 38.0 85 80 25 5.27 0.1346 WVFGRD96 40.0 265 65 30 5.33 0.1321 WVFGRD96 42.0 260 65 20 5.35 0.1305 WVFGRD96 44.0 260 70 20 5.36 0.1296 WVFGRD96 46.0 255 75 15 5.38 0.1298 WVFGRD96 48.0 255 75 10 5.40 0.1311 WVFGRD96 50.0 255 80 -15 5.43 0.1332 WVFGRD96 52.0 255 80 -15 5.45 0.1374 WVFGRD96 54.0 255 80 -15 5.47 0.1422 WVFGRD96 56.0 255 80 -15 5.49 0.1473 WVFGRD96 58.0 255 80 -15 5.50 0.1537 WVFGRD96 60.0 255 80 -15 5.52 0.1605 WVFGRD96 62.0 255 80 -15 5.54 0.1682 WVFGRD96 64.0 255 80 -10 5.55 0.1784 WVFGRD96 66.0 255 80 -10 5.57 0.1895 WVFGRD96 68.0 255 80 -10 5.58 0.2014 WVFGRD96 70.0 255 80 -10 5.60 0.2143 WVFGRD96 72.0 255 80 -10 5.62 0.2293 WVFGRD96 74.0 255 85 -10 5.63 0.2465 WVFGRD96 76.0 255 85 -10 5.65 0.2650 WVFGRD96 78.0 250 90 -10 5.66 0.2843 WVFGRD96 80.0 250 90 -10 5.67 0.3042 WVFGRD96 82.0 250 90 -10 5.68 0.3226 WVFGRD96 84.0 70 85 10 5.69 0.3408 WVFGRD96 86.0 70 85 10 5.70 0.3564 WVFGRD96 88.0 70 80 15 5.71 0.3698 WVFGRD96 90.0 70 80 15 5.72 0.3829 WVFGRD96 92.0 70 80 15 5.73 0.4039 WVFGRD96 94.0 70 75 20 5.74 0.4278 WVFGRD96 96.0 70 75 20 5.75 0.4536 WVFGRD96 98.0 70 75 20 5.76 0.4799 WVFGRD96 100.0 70 75 20 5.77 0.5068 WVFGRD96 102.0 70 75 20 5.78 0.5320 WVFGRD96 104.0 70 75 25 5.79 0.5553 WVFGRD96 106.0 70 75 25 5.80 0.5738 WVFGRD96 108.0 70 75 25 5.80 0.5862 WVFGRD96 110.0 70 75 25 5.81 0.5943 WVFGRD96 112.0 70 75 25 5.81 0.6011 WVFGRD96 114.0 70 75 25 5.81 0.6071 WVFGRD96 116.0 70 75 25 5.82 0.6129 WVFGRD96 118.0 70 75 25 5.82 0.6182 WVFGRD96 120.0 70 75 25 5.83 0.6234 WVFGRD96 122.0 70 75 25 5.83 0.6281 WVFGRD96 124.0 75 70 30 5.83 0.6324 WVFGRD96 126.0 75 70 30 5.83 0.6365 WVFGRD96 128.0 75 70 30 5.83 0.6397 WVFGRD96 130.0 75 70 30 5.84 0.6436 WVFGRD96 132.0 75 70 30 5.84 0.6468 WVFGRD96 134.0 75 70 30 5.84 0.6494 WVFGRD96 136.0 75 70 30 5.84 0.6519 WVFGRD96 138.0 75 70 30 5.84 0.6538 WVFGRD96 140.0 75 75 30 5.85 0.6554 WVFGRD96 142.0 75 75 30 5.85 0.6571 WVFGRD96 144.0 75 75 30 5.85 0.6587 WVFGRD96 146.0 75 75 30 5.85 0.6602 WVFGRD96 148.0 75 75 30 5.85 0.6613 WVFGRD96 150.0 75 75 30 5.86 0.6621 WVFGRD96 152.0 75 75 30 5.86 0.6628 WVFGRD96 154.0 75 75 30 5.86 0.6635 WVFGRD96 156.0 75 75 30 5.86 0.6639 WVFGRD96 158.0 75 75 30 5.86 0.6640 WVFGRD96 160.0 75 75 30 5.87 0.6638 WVFGRD96 162.0 75 75 30 5.87 0.6636 WVFGRD96 164.0 75 75 30 5.87 0.6629 WVFGRD96 166.0 75 75 30 5.87 0.6619 WVFGRD96 168.0 75 75 30 5.87 0.6609 WVFGRD96 170.0 75 75 30 5.87 0.6601
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 158.0 75 75 30 5.86 0.6640
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00