The ANSS event ID is us7000fpq6 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000fpq6/executive.
2021/10/29 10:11:07 65.244 -134.597 10.0 3.5 Yukon, Canada
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2021/10/29 10:11:07:0 65.24 -134.60 10.0 3.5 Yukon, Canada Stations used: AK.DOT AK.E27K AK.G27K AK.I27K AK.L26K AK.M26K AK.M27K AK.RIDG AK.SCRK CN.BVCY CN.DAWY CN.HYT CN.INK CN.YUK5 CN.YUK6 EO.KLRS PQ.KLONY PQ.OGILY Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.32e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.51 Z = 13 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 286 62 112 NP2 65 35 55 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.32e+21 66 235 N 0.00e+00 19 95 P -2.32e+21 14 360 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -2.05e+21 Mxy 1.93e+20 Mxz -1.05e+21 Myy 2.65e+20 Myz -7.12e+20 Mzz 1.78e+21 ----- ------ --------- P ---------- ------------ ------------- ------------------------------ ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------ -------------------------------------- --#####################----------------# ############################-----------# #################################------### ###################################----### ############### ###################-#### ############### T ###################--### ############## ##################----# ##################################------ ###############################------- -##########################--------- --#####################----------- -----###########-------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 1.78e+21 -1.05e+21 7.12e+20 -1.05e+21 -2.05e+21 -1.93e+20 7.12e+20 -1.93e+20 2.65e+20 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20211029101107/index.html |
STK = 65 DIP = 35 RAKE = 55 MW = 3.51 HS = 13.0
The NDK file is 20211029101107.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 120 50 90 3.27 0.3895 WVFGRD96 2.0 120 50 90 3.34 0.4229 WVFGRD96 3.0 35 70 -20 3.30 0.3838 WVFGRD96 4.0 60 20 20 3.46 0.4146 WVFGRD96 5.0 60 20 20 3.44 0.4476 WVFGRD96 6.0 60 25 20 3.41 0.4664 WVFGRD96 7.0 70 25 40 3.42 0.4766 WVFGRD96 8.0 60 25 25 3.46 0.4820 WVFGRD96 9.0 65 25 40 3.48 0.4897 WVFGRD96 10.0 70 30 55 3.50 0.4971 WVFGRD96 11.0 70 30 60 3.51 0.5039 WVFGRD96 12.0 65 35 55 3.51 0.5080 WVFGRD96 13.0 65 35 55 3.51 0.5096 WVFGRD96 14.0 65 35 55 3.51 0.5092 WVFGRD96 15.0 60 35 50 3.52 0.5073 WVFGRD96 16.0 60 35 50 3.52 0.5047 WVFGRD96 17.0 55 40 40 3.52 0.5013 WVFGRD96 18.0 55 40 40 3.53 0.4973 WVFGRD96 19.0 50 40 30 3.53 0.4924 WVFGRD96 20.0 50 40 30 3.53 0.4871 WVFGRD96 21.0 50 40 30 3.55 0.4818 WVFGRD96 22.0 50 40 30 3.56 0.4754 WVFGRD96 23.0 50 40 30 3.57 0.4683 WVFGRD96 24.0 55 35 35 3.57 0.4605 WVFGRD96 25.0 55 35 35 3.58 0.4522 WVFGRD96 26.0 55 35 35 3.59 0.4433 WVFGRD96 27.0 55 35 35 3.60 0.4338 WVFGRD96 28.0 55 35 35 3.61 0.4238 WVFGRD96 29.0 55 35 35 3.62 0.4131
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 13.0 65 35 55 3.51 0.5096
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00