The ANSS event ID is us6000c97v and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000c97v/executive.
2020/10/18 16:46:37 62.255 -124.413 2.2 4 Canada, NWT
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2020/10/18 16:46:37:0 62.26 -124.41 2.2 4.0 Canada, NWT Stations used: 1E.MONT8 AK.BESE AK.CHX AK.GRNC AK.I26K AK.I27K AK.JIS AK.K27K AK.L26K AK.M26K AK.M27K AK.MCAR AK.PIN AK.PNL AK.R32K AK.RKAV AK.S31K AK.S32K AK.SAMH AK.TABL AK.U33K AK.V35K AT.SIT AT.SKAG CN.BMTB CN.BRWY CN.BVCY CN.DAWY CN.DLBC CN.FNSB CN.FSJB CN.HYT CN.NAB2 CN.NAHA CN.NBC1 CN.NBC8 CN.PLBC CN.RUBB CN.WHY CN.YUK2 CN.YUK3 CN.YUK6 CN.YUK7 EO.FSJ2 NY.MMPY NY.WGLY NY.WTLY RV.SNUFA TA.E29M TA.F30M TA.F31M TA.H29M TA.I28M TA.I29M TA.J29N TA.J30M TA.K29M TA.L27K TA.L29M TA.M29M TA.M31M TA.N30M TA.N31M TA.N32M TA.O28M TA.O29M TA.P29M TA.P30M TA.P32M TA.P33M TA.Q32M TA.R31K TA.R33M TA.S34M TA.T33K TA.T35M US.WRAK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.14e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 3.97 Z = 4 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 310 70 80 NP2 157 22 116 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.14e+22 64 204 N 0.00e+00 9 313 P -1.14e+22 24 48 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -2.39e+21 Mxy -3.86e+21 Mxz -6.99e+21 Myy -4.79e+21 Myz -4.99e+21 Mzz 7.18e+21 -------------- #--------------------- ##-------------------------- ##---------------------------- ---####-------------------- ---- ---#########---------------- P ----- ---#############------------- ------ ----################-------------------- ---###################------------------ ----######################---------------- ----########################-------------- ----#########################------------- -----##########################----------- ----############ ############--------- -----########### T ##############------- -----########## ###############----- -----############################--- -----############################- -----######################### ------###################### -------############### ---------####- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 7.18e+21 -6.99e+21 4.99e+21 -6.99e+21 -2.39e+21 3.86e+21 4.99e+21 3.86e+21 -4.79e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20201018164637/index.html |
STK = 310 DIP = 70 RAKE = 80 MW = 3.97 HS = 4.0
The NDK file is 20201018164637.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated.
Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 120 15 60 4.04 0.6473 WVFGRD96 2.0 305 75 80 4.01 0.6471 WVFGRD96 3.0 305 75 80 3.99 0.6625 WVFGRD96 4.0 310 70 80 3.97 0.6698 WVFGRD96 5.0 310 70 80 3.96 0.6694 WVFGRD96 6.0 315 65 85 3.96 0.6612 WVFGRD96 7.0 310 65 85 3.95 0.6503 WVFGRD96 8.0 310 65 85 3.94 0.6368 WVFGRD96 9.0 310 65 85 3.92 0.6186 WVFGRD96 10.0 310 65 85 3.95 0.6124 WVFGRD96 11.0 305 70 75 3.92 0.5935 WVFGRD96 12.0 235 40 -75 4.00 0.5860 WVFGRD96 13.0 315 50 -80 3.97 0.5951 WVFGRD96 14.0 120 40 -100 3.97 0.6039 WVFGRD96 15.0 315 50 -80 3.96 0.6058 WVFGRD96 16.0 315 50 -85 3.96 0.6039 WVFGRD96 17.0 320 50 -75 3.96 0.5990 WVFGRD96 18.0 320 50 -75 3.96 0.5923 WVFGRD96 19.0 320 50 -75 3.97 0.5837 WVFGRD96 20.0 325 55 -70 3.99 0.5735 WVFGRD96 21.0 325 55 -70 3.99 0.5660 WVFGRD96 22.0 325 55 -70 3.99 0.5569 WVFGRD96 23.0 325 55 -70 3.99 0.5468 WVFGRD96 24.0 325 55 -70 3.99 0.5361 WVFGRD96 25.0 325 55 -65 4.00 0.5249 WVFGRD96 26.0 330 55 -65 4.00 0.5132 WVFGRD96 27.0 330 55 -60 4.00 0.5016 WVFGRD96 28.0 330 55 -60 4.00 0.4896 WVFGRD96 29.0 330 55 -60 4.01 0.4772
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 4.0 310 70 80 3.97 0.6698
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00