The ANSS event ID is us70005m30 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us70005m30/executive.
2019/09/26 23:32:07 60.922 -125.438 10.0 3.9 Yukon, Canada
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2019/09/26 23:32:07:0 60.92 -125.44 10.0 3.9 Yukon, Canada
Stations used:
1E.MONT5 AK.JIS AT.SKAG CN.DLBC CN.FNSB CN.NAHA CN.WHY
CN.YKAW1 CN.YKAW3 NY.MMPY NY.TGTN TA.P30M TA.P32M TA.P33M
TA.Q32M TA.R33M TA.S34M TA.T35M YO.KOTA YO.LIRD YO.TOAD
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +60
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.08 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 2.85e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.57
Z = 16 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 147 83 119
NP2 250 30 15
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 2.85e+21 45 86
N 0.00e+00 29 323
P -2.85e+21 31 213
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.45e+21
Mxy -8.49e+20
Mxz 1.16e+21
Myy 8.10e+20
Myz 2.11e+21
Mzz 6.39e+20
--------------
----------------------
###-------------------------
#####-----###############-----
###############################---
######----#########################-
#####-------##########################
#####---------##########################
###------------#########################
###--------------############## ########
###---------------############# T ########
##-----------------############ ########
##-------------------#####################
---------------------###################
----------------------##################
----------------------################
--------- -----------#############
-------- P ------------###########
------ --------------#######
------------------------####
----------------------
--------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
6.39e+20 1.16e+21 -2.11e+21
1.16e+21 -1.45e+21 8.49e+20
-2.11e+21 8.49e+20 8.10e+20
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20190926233207/index.html
|
STK = 250
DIP = 30
RAKE = 15
MW = 3.57
HS = 16.0
The NDK file is 20190926233207.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 310 40 -90 3.29 0.2378
WVFGRD96 2.0 310 40 -90 3.40 0.2866
WVFGRD96 3.0 25 40 -60 3.39 0.2205
WVFGRD96 4.0 330 80 -70 3.42 0.2327
WVFGRD96 5.0 245 20 0 3.41 0.2694
WVFGRD96 6.0 240 25 -10 3.41 0.2988
WVFGRD96 7.0 235 25 -20 3.41 0.3196
WVFGRD96 8.0 245 20 0 3.49 0.3325
WVFGRD96 9.0 245 20 0 3.49 0.3540
WVFGRD96 10.0 245 25 0 3.50 0.3702
WVFGRD96 11.0 250 25 10 3.51 0.3821
WVFGRD96 12.0 255 30 20 3.54 0.3913
WVFGRD96 13.0 255 30 20 3.55 0.3987
WVFGRD96 14.0 255 30 20 3.55 0.4031
WVFGRD96 15.0 250 30 15 3.56 0.4049
WVFGRD96 16.0 250 30 15 3.57 0.4053
WVFGRD96 17.0 245 30 5 3.58 0.4041
WVFGRD96 18.0 245 30 5 3.59 0.4019
WVFGRD96 19.0 245 30 5 3.60 0.3986
WVFGRD96 20.0 240 25 0 3.60 0.3945
WVFGRD96 21.0 240 25 0 3.62 0.3902
WVFGRD96 22.0 240 25 0 3.63 0.3851
WVFGRD96 23.0 235 25 -5 3.64 0.3791
WVFGRD96 24.0 235 25 -5 3.65 0.3730
WVFGRD96 25.0 230 20 -10 3.66 0.3661
WVFGRD96 26.0 230 20 -10 3.67 0.3583
WVFGRD96 27.0 230 20 -10 3.68 0.3494
WVFGRD96 28.0 225 20 -15 3.69 0.3403
WVFGRD96 29.0 225 20 -15 3.69 0.3300
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 16.0 250 30 15 3.57 0.4053
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00