The ANSS event ID is ak019f5fh9w and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak019f5fh9w/executive.
2019/01/09 16:11:30 60.214 -150.965 65.9 4.4 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2019/01/09 16:11:30:0 60.21 -150.96 65.9 4.4 Alaska Stations used: AK.BRLK AK.CAPN AK.CNP AK.CUT AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HOM AK.KNK AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SKN AK.SLK AT.PMR AV.ILSW AV.STLK GM.AD09 TA.M20K TA.M22K TA.O19K TA.O22K TA.P18K TA.P19K TA.Q19K Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.61e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.48 Z = 70 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 65 75 -20 NP2 160 71 -164 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.61e+22 3 113 N 0.00e+00 65 210 P -6.61e+22 25 22 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.67e+22 Mxy -4.29e+22 Mxz -2.45e+22 Myy 4.80e+22 Myz -6.29e+21 Mzz -1.13e+22 -------------- ####------------------ ######------------ ------- #######------------ P -------- #########------------ ---------- ###########------------------------- ############-------------------------# #############------------------------### ##############---------------------##### ###############------------------######### ################---------------########### ################------------############## #################-------################## #################--##################### ##############---#################### ######-----------################### T -----------------################## -----------------################# -----------------############# -----------------########### ----------------###### -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.13e+22 -2.45e+22 6.29e+21 -2.45e+22 -3.67e+22 4.29e+22 6.29e+21 4.29e+22 4.80e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20190109161130/index.html |
STK = 65 DIP = 75 RAKE = -20 MW = 4.48 HS = 70.0
The NDK file is 20190109161130.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2019/01/09 16:11:30:0 60.21 -150.96 65.9 4.4 Alaska Stations used: AK.BRLK AK.CAPN AK.CNP AK.CUT AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HOM AK.KNK AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SKN AK.SLK AT.PMR AV.ILSW AV.STLK GM.AD09 TA.M20K TA.M22K TA.O19K TA.O22K TA.P18K TA.P19K TA.Q19K Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 6.61e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.48 Z = 70 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 65 75 -20 NP2 160 71 -164 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 6.61e+22 3 113 N 0.00e+00 65 210 P -6.61e+22 25 22 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.67e+22 Mxy -4.29e+22 Mxz -2.45e+22 Myy 4.80e+22 Myz -6.29e+21 Mzz -1.13e+22 -------------- ####------------------ ######------------ ------- #######------------ P -------- #########------------ ---------- ###########------------------------- ############-------------------------# #############------------------------### ##############---------------------##### ###############------------------######### ################---------------########### ################------------############## #################-------################## #################--##################### ##############---#################### ######-----------################### T -----------------################## -----------------################# -----------------############# -----------------########### ----------------###### -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.13e+22 -2.45e+22 6.29e+21 -2.45e+22 -3.67e+22 4.29e+22 6.29e+21 4.29e+22 4.80e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20190109161130/index.html |
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 5.559e+15 N-m Magnitude 4.43 Mwr Depth 65.0 km Percent DC 78% Half Duration - Catalog US Data Source US 3 Contributor US 3 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 164 79 -150 NP2 68 61 -13 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 5.213e+15 N-m 12 293 N 0.637e+15 N-m 59 183 P -5.850e+15 N-m 29 30 |
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 2.0 70 80 -10 3.72 0.3406 WVFGRD96 4.0 70 75 -20 3.81 0.3905 WVFGRD96 6.0 70 75 -20 3.85 0.4163 WVFGRD96 8.0 70 70 -20 3.91 0.4332 WVFGRD96 10.0 70 75 -20 3.93 0.4448 WVFGRD96 12.0 80 65 20 3.98 0.4563 WVFGRD96 14.0 75 70 15 3.99 0.4649 WVFGRD96 16.0 75 75 15 4.01 0.4704 WVFGRD96 18.0 75 75 10 4.02 0.4718 WVFGRD96 20.0 75 75 10 4.04 0.4715 WVFGRD96 22.0 75 80 10 4.06 0.4704 WVFGRD96 24.0 75 80 10 4.07 0.4690 WVFGRD96 26.0 75 80 10 4.09 0.4665 WVFGRD96 28.0 75 80 10 4.10 0.4637 WVFGRD96 30.0 75 80 10 4.12 0.4621 WVFGRD96 32.0 70 85 -5 4.14 0.4629 WVFGRD96 34.0 70 85 -10 4.16 0.4662 WVFGRD96 36.0 250 90 10 4.19 0.4695 WVFGRD96 38.0 250 90 10 4.22 0.4758 WVFGRD96 40.0 70 75 -15 4.27 0.4909 WVFGRD96 42.0 70 75 -15 4.29 0.4984 WVFGRD96 44.0 70 75 -15 4.31 0.5057 WVFGRD96 46.0 70 75 -15 4.33 0.5138 WVFGRD96 48.0 70 75 -15 4.35 0.5215 WVFGRD96 50.0 70 75 -15 4.36 0.5296 WVFGRD96 52.0 70 75 -15 4.38 0.5368 WVFGRD96 54.0 70 75 -15 4.39 0.5438 WVFGRD96 56.0 70 75 -15 4.40 0.5499 WVFGRD96 58.0 65 75 -20 4.43 0.5553 WVFGRD96 60.0 65 75 -20 4.44 0.5604 WVFGRD96 62.0 65 75 -20 4.45 0.5645 WVFGRD96 64.0 65 75 -20 4.46 0.5679 WVFGRD96 66.0 65 75 -20 4.47 0.5706 WVFGRD96 68.0 65 75 -20 4.47 0.5717 WVFGRD96 70.0 65 75 -20 4.48 0.5723 WVFGRD96 72.0 65 75 -20 4.49 0.5714 WVFGRD96 74.0 65 75 -20 4.49 0.5703 WVFGRD96 76.0 65 75 -20 4.50 0.5679 WVFGRD96 78.0 65 75 -20 4.51 0.5646 WVFGRD96 80.0 65 75 -20 4.51 0.5607 WVFGRD96 82.0 65 70 -20 4.52 0.5564 WVFGRD96 84.0 65 75 -15 4.51 0.5521 WVFGRD96 86.0 65 75 -15 4.51 0.5473 WVFGRD96 88.0 65 75 -15 4.52 0.5420 WVFGRD96 90.0 65 75 -15 4.52 0.5367 WVFGRD96 92.0 65 75 -15 4.52 0.5316 WVFGRD96 94.0 65 75 -15 4.53 0.5261 WVFGRD96 96.0 65 75 -15 4.53 0.5204 WVFGRD96 98.0 70 80 -10 4.52 0.5156
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 70.0 65 75 -20 4.48 0.5723
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00