Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated. Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
The ANSS event ID is ak018acfg224 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak018acfg224/executive.
2018/08/13 19:36:09 69.547 -144.459 17.3 4.9 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2018/08/13 19:36:09:0 69.55 -144.46 17.3 4.9 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.CCB AK.COLD AK.HDA AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.NEA2 AK.PPD AK.WRH
CN.INK IU.COLA TA.B22K TA.C26K TA.D24K TA.D25K TA.D27M
TA.D28M TA.E23K TA.E24K TA.E27K TA.E28M TA.E29M TA.EPYK
TA.F20K TA.F24K TA.F25K TA.F26K TA.F28M TA.F31M TA.G23K
TA.G24K TA.G27K TA.G29M TA.G30M TA.H21K TA.H23K TA.H24K
TA.I23K TA.I28M TA.J25K TA.J26L TA.POKR TA.TOLK US.EGAK
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.04e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.61
Z = 14 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 99 76 154
NP2 195 65 15
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.04e+23 28 55
N 0.00e+00 61 253
P -1.04e+23 8 149
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -4.67e+22
Mxy 8.36e+22
Mxz 3.64e+22
Myy 2.62e+22
Myz 2.76e+22
Mzz 2.05e+22
-----------###
-------------#########
---------------#############
--------------################
---------------###################
---------------############## ####
---------------############### T #####
---------------################ ######
---------------#########################
#--------------###########################
####-----------###########################
#########-----############################
##############---#########################
#############---------------------------
############----------------------------
###########---------------------------
##########--------------------------
#########-------------------------
########---------------- ---
#######---------------- P --
#####---------------
#-------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
2.05e+22 3.64e+22 -2.76e+22
3.64e+22 -4.67e+22 -8.36e+22
-2.76e+22 -8.36e+22 2.62e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20180813193609/index.html
|
STK = 195
DIP = 65
RAKE = 15
MW = 4.61
HS = 14.0
The NDK file is 20180813193609.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated.
Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 105 90 10 4.10 0.2582
WVFGRD96 2.0 245 55 -80 4.33 0.3242
WVFGRD96 3.0 100 60 -15 4.30 0.3454
WVFGRD96 4.0 100 60 -10 4.33 0.3653
WVFGRD96 5.0 285 75 50 4.38 0.3941
WVFGRD96 6.0 25 50 40 4.42 0.4320
WVFGRD96 7.0 195 55 20 4.43 0.4735
WVFGRD96 8.0 35 45 60 4.54 0.5211
WVFGRD96 9.0 200 55 30 4.53 0.5523
WVFGRD96 10.0 195 60 20 4.54 0.5772
WVFGRD96 11.0 195 60 20 4.56 0.5948
WVFGRD96 12.0 195 65 15 4.58 0.6060
WVFGRD96 13.0 195 65 15 4.60 0.6116
WVFGRD96 14.0 195 65 15 4.61 0.6127
WVFGRD96 15.0 190 70 10 4.62 0.6108
WVFGRD96 16.0 190 70 5 4.63 0.6072
WVFGRD96 17.0 190 70 5 4.65 0.6015
WVFGRD96 18.0 190 70 5 4.65 0.5937
WVFGRD96 19.0 190 70 5 4.66 0.5847
WVFGRD96 20.0 190 70 5 4.67 0.5746
WVFGRD96 21.0 190 70 5 4.68 0.5638
WVFGRD96 22.0 190 65 5 4.69 0.5546
WVFGRD96 23.0 190 65 5 4.69 0.5445
WVFGRD96 24.0 190 65 5 4.70 0.5338
WVFGRD96 25.0 190 65 5 4.71 0.5217
WVFGRD96 26.0 190 65 5 4.71 0.5103
WVFGRD96 27.0 190 60 5 4.72 0.4986
WVFGRD96 28.0 190 60 5 4.72 0.4874
WVFGRD96 29.0 185 55 -5 4.72 0.4773
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 14.0 195 65 15 4.61 0.6127
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.0000 5.0000 2.8900 2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 9.0000 6.1000 3.5200 2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.0000 6.4000 3.7000 2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 20.0000 6.7000 3.8700 2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 8.1500 4.7000 3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00