Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated. Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
The ANSS event ID is us2000dvlb and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000dvlb/executive.
2018/04/06 15:07:12 36.285 -97.511 6.3 3.9 Oklahoma
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2018/04/06 15:07:12:0 36.28 -97.51 6.3 3.9 Oklahoma
Stations used:
AG.HHAR GM.IWM01 GS.OK029 GS.OK032 GS.OK033 GS.OK048
GS.OK052 N4.R32B N4.S39B N4.T35B N4.U38B O2.CHAN O2.DOVR
O2.DRUM O2.MRSH O2.PERK O2.PERY O2.POCA O2.SHWN OK.CHOK
OK.CROK OK.CSTR OK.DEOK OK.FNO OK.HTCH OK.W35A OK.X37A
TA.TUL3 US.CBKS
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.62e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.71
Z = 5 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 150 90 10
NP2 60 80 180
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.62e+21 7 15
N 0.00e+00 80 150
P -4.62e+21 7 285
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 3.94e+21
Mxy 2.28e+21
Mxz 4.01e+20
Myy -3.94e+21
Myz 6.95e+20
Mzz -7.02e+13
########### T
-############## ####
-----#######################
-------#######################
----------########################
------------########################
--------------#####################---
-------------##################------
P --------------###############--------
- ---------------###########------------
--------------------#######---------------
----------------------##------------------
---------------------##-------------------
-----------------######-----------------
-------------###########----------------
--------################--------------
-#######################------------
########################----------
#######################-------
#######################-----
#####################-
##############
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-7.02e+13 4.01e+20 -6.95e+20
4.01e+20 3.94e+21 -2.28e+21
-6.95e+20 -2.28e+21 -3.94e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20180406150712/index.html
|
STK = 150
DIP = 90
RAKE = 10
MW = 3.71
HS = 5.0
The NDK file is 20180406150712.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated.
Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 325 75 -15 3.45 0.4547
WVFGRD96 2.0 150 90 20 3.58 0.5742
WVFGRD96 3.0 150 90 20 3.64 0.6344
WVFGRD96 4.0 150 90 15 3.68 0.6651
WVFGRD96 5.0 150 90 10 3.71 0.6757
WVFGRD96 6.0 330 85 -5 3.75 0.6741
WVFGRD96 7.0 330 85 -5 3.78 0.6655
WVFGRD96 8.0 325 85 -10 3.81 0.6509
WVFGRD96 9.0 325 85 -10 3.83 0.6305
WVFGRD96 10.0 145 90 5 3.84 0.6073
WVFGRD96 11.0 325 85 -5 3.86 0.5874
WVFGRD96 12.0 145 90 5 3.87 0.5651
WVFGRD96 13.0 325 90 -5 3.89 0.5433
WVFGRD96 14.0 145 90 5 3.90 0.5219
WVFGRD96 15.0 145 90 5 3.91 0.5015
WVFGRD96 16.0 145 90 5 3.92 0.4813
WVFGRD96 17.0 145 90 5 3.92 0.4626
WVFGRD96 18.0 145 90 5 3.93 0.4455
WVFGRD96 19.0 325 85 -5 3.94 0.4322
WVFGRD96 20.0 325 85 -5 3.94 0.4184
WVFGRD96 21.0 325 80 -5 3.95 0.4083
WVFGRD96 22.0 325 80 -5 3.95 0.4001
WVFGRD96 23.0 325 80 -5 3.96 0.3929
WVFGRD96 24.0 325 80 -5 3.96 0.3879
WVFGRD96 25.0 325 80 15 3.98 0.3846
WVFGRD96 26.0 325 90 25 3.99 0.3838
WVFGRD96 27.0 325 90 20 3.99 0.3829
WVFGRD96 28.0 325 90 20 3.99 0.3821
WVFGRD96 29.0 55 85 10 3.99 0.3772
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 5.0 150 90 10 3.71 0.6757
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00