Location

SLU Location

To check the ANSS location or to compare the observed P-wave first motions to the moment tensor solution, P- and S-wave first arrival times were manually read together with the P-wave first motions. The subsequent output of the program elocate is given in the file elocate.txt. The first motion plot is shown below.

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is nm60207021 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nm60207021/executive.

2017/09/19 11:47:28 38.424 -87.910 11.7 3.8 Utah

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2017/09/19 11:47:28:0  38.42  -87.91  11.7 3.8 Utah
 
 Stations used:
   AG.LCAR ET.SWET IU.CCM IU.WCI IU.WVT N4.L42A N4.L46A 
   N4.N41A N4.N49A N4.O44A N4.O49A N4.P40B N4.P43A N4.P46A 
   N4.P48A N4.Q44B N4.R49A N4.R50A N4.S44A N4.S51A N4.T45B 
   N4.T47A N4.T50A N4.U49A N4.V51A N4.W50A NM.BLO NM.CGM3 
   NM.CLTN NM.FFIL NM.FVM NM.GLAT NM.HALT NM.HBAR NM.HICK 
   NM.LNXT NM.MGMO NM.OLIL NM.PARM NM.PBMO NM.PEBM NM.PLAL 
   NM.PVMO NM.SLM NM.USIN NM.UTMT NW.HQIL TA.SFIN US.HDIL 
   US.TZTN 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 6.10e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.79 
  Z  = 10 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      125    90   -10
   NP2      215    80   -180
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   6.10e+21      7     170
    N   0.00e+00     80     305
    P  -6.10e+21      7      80

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     5.64e+21
       Mxy    -2.05e+21
       Mxz    -8.67e+20
       Myy    -5.64e+21
       Myz    -6.07e+20
       Mzz     9.25e+13
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##############                  
                 ######################              
              ########################----           
             #######################-------          
           #######################-----------        
          ---####################-------------       
         -------###############----------------      
        -----------###########------------------     
        -------------#######------------------       
       -----------------###------------------- P     
       -------------------#-------------------       
       -----------------#####--------------------    
       ----------------#########-----------------    
        --------------#############-------------     
        -------------################-----------     
         -----------####################-------      
          ---------########################---       
           -------###########################        
             ----##########################          
              --##########################           
                 #############   ######              
                     ######### T ##                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  9.25e+13  -8.67e+20   6.07e+20 
 -8.67e+20   5.64e+21   2.05e+21 
  6.07e+20   2.05e+21  -5.64e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170919114728/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is

      STK = 125
      DIP = 90
     RAKE = -10
       MW = 3.79
       HS = 10.0

The NDK file is 20170919114728.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
SLU
USGSMWR
SLUFM
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2017/09/19 11:47:28:0  38.42  -87.91  11.7 3.8 Utah
 
 Stations used:
   AG.LCAR ET.SWET IU.CCM IU.WCI IU.WVT N4.L42A N4.L46A 
   N4.N41A N4.N49A N4.O44A N4.O49A N4.P40B N4.P43A N4.P46A 
   N4.P48A N4.Q44B N4.R49A N4.R50A N4.S44A N4.S51A N4.T45B 
   N4.T47A N4.T50A N4.U49A N4.V51A N4.W50A NM.BLO NM.CGM3 
   NM.CLTN NM.FFIL NM.FVM NM.GLAT NM.HALT NM.HBAR NM.HICK 
   NM.LNXT NM.MGMO NM.OLIL NM.PARM NM.PBMO NM.PEBM NM.PLAL 
   NM.PVMO NM.SLM NM.USIN NM.UTMT NW.HQIL TA.SFIN US.HDIL 
   US.TZTN 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 6.10e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.79 
  Z  = 10 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      125    90   -10
   NP2      215    80   -180
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   6.10e+21      7     170
    N   0.00e+00     80     305
    P  -6.10e+21      7      80

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     5.64e+21
       Mxy    -2.05e+21
       Mxz    -8.67e+20
       Myy    -5.64e+21
       Myz    -6.07e+20
       Mzz     9.25e+13
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##############                  
                 ######################              
              ########################----           
             #######################-------          
           #######################-----------        
          ---####################-------------       
         -------###############----------------      
        -----------###########------------------     
        -------------#######------------------       
       -----------------###------------------- P     
       -------------------#-------------------       
       -----------------#####--------------------    
       ----------------#########-----------------    
        --------------#############-------------     
        -------------################-----------     
         -----------####################-------      
          ---------########################---       
           -------###########################        
             ----##########################          
              --##########################           
                 #############   ######              
                     ######### T ##                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  9.25e+13  -8.67e+20   6.07e+20 
 -8.67e+20   5.64e+21   2.05e+21 
  6.07e+20   2.05e+21  -5.64e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170919114728/index.html
	
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr)
Moment	7.302e+14 N-m
Magnitude	3.8 Mwr
Depth	19.0 km
Percent DC	87 %
Half Duration	–
Catalog	US
Data Source	US2
Contributor	US2
Nodal Planes
Plane	Strike	Dip	Rake
NP1	126	86	-10
NP2	217	80	-176
Principal Axes
Axis	Value	Plunge	Azimuth
T	7.053e+14 N-m	4	172
N	0.474e+14 N-m	79	284
P	-7.527e+14 N-m	10	81

        


First motions and takeoff angles from an elocate run.

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

mLg Magnitude


Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated. Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.

ML Magnitude


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Context

The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   310    75    25   3.65 0.4646
WVFGRD96    2.0   310    80    30   3.70 0.5139
WVFGRD96    3.0   305    90    25   3.71 0.5569
WVFGRD96    4.0   125    85   -20   3.72 0.5920
WVFGRD96    5.0   125    85   -20   3.73 0.6184
WVFGRD96    6.0   125    85   -15   3.74 0.6378
WVFGRD96    7.0   125    85   -15   3.75 0.6509
WVFGRD96    8.0   125    85   -15   3.76 0.6591
WVFGRD96    9.0   125    90   -10   3.78 0.6646
WVFGRD96   10.0   125    90   -10   3.79 0.6666
WVFGRD96   11.0   125    90   -10   3.80 0.6660
WVFGRD96   12.0   125    90   -10   3.81 0.6624
WVFGRD96   13.0   125    90   -10   3.82 0.6558
WVFGRD96   14.0   305    90    10   3.82 0.6463
WVFGRD96   15.0   125    90   -10   3.83 0.6346
WVFGRD96   16.0   305    90    10   3.84 0.6211
WVFGRD96   17.0   125    90   -10   3.85 0.6085
WVFGRD96   18.0   125    90    -5   3.85 0.5947
WVFGRD96   19.0   125    90   -10   3.86 0.5804
WVFGRD96   20.0   125    90   -10   3.87 0.5663
WVFGRD96   21.0   125    90   -10   3.88 0.5513
WVFGRD96   22.0   305    90    10   3.88 0.5374
WVFGRD96   23.0   125    90   -10   3.89 0.5236
WVFGRD96   24.0   305    90    15   3.89 0.5115
WVFGRD96   25.0   305    90    15   3.90 0.5003
WVFGRD96   26.0   305    90    15   3.90 0.4900
WVFGRD96   27.0   305    90    15   3.91 0.4806
WVFGRD96   28.0   125    90   -15   3.91 0.4722
WVFGRD96   29.0   125    90   -15   3.92 0.4644

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   10.0   125    90   -10   3.79 0.6666

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
  H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)   QP   QS  ETAP  ETAS  FREFP  FREFS
  1.0000  5.0000  2.8900  2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
  9.0000  6.1000  3.5200  2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
 10.0000  6.4000  3.7000  2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
 20.0000  6.7000  3.8700  2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
  0.0000  8.1500  4.7000  3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
Last Changed Sat Apr 27 07:27:22 PM CDT 2024