The ANSS event ID is us1000621p and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us1000621p/executive.
2016/07/08 22:29:38 36.475 -98.746 6.4 4.2 Oklahoma
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2016/07/08 22:29:38:0 36.47 -98.75 6.4 4.2 Oklahoma Stations used: AG.HHAR GS.KAN01 GS.KAN05 GS.KAN06 GS.KAN08 GS.KAN10 GS.KAN12 GS.KAN13 GS.KAN14 GS.KAN16 GS.KAN17 GS.KS20 GS.KS21 GS.OK025 GS.OK029 GS.OK030 GS.OK031 GS.OK032 GS.OK033 GS.OK034 GS.OK035 N4.T35B N4.U38B OK.BCOK OK.BLOK OK.CHOK OK.CROK OK.ELIS OK.FNO OK.GORE OK.HTCH OK.NOKA OK.OKCFA OK.X37A TA.TUL1 US.CBKS US.KSU1 Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.97e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.13 Z = 7 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 310 80 -15 NP2 43 75 -170 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.97e+22 3 357 N 0.00e+00 72 97 P -1.97e+22 18 266 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.95e+22 Mxy -2.40e+21 Mxz 1.55e+21 Myy -1.78e+22 Myz 5.62e+21 Mzz -1.75e+21 #### T ####### ######## ########### ############################ #############################- ----##########################---- --------######################------ ------------##################-------- ----------------##############---------- ------------------###########----------- ----------------------######-------------- -- -------------------###--------------- -- P --------------------#---------------- -- -------------------####-------------- ---------------------########----------- -------------------############--------- ----------------###############------- -------------###################---- ---------#######################-- ----########################## ############################ ###################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.75e+21 1.55e+21 -5.62e+21 1.55e+21 1.95e+22 2.40e+21 -5.62e+21 2.40e+21 -1.78e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20160708222938/index.html |
STK = 310 DIP = 80 RAKE = -15 MW = 4.13 HS = 7.0
The NDK file is 20160708222938.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2016/07/08 22:29:38:0 36.47 -98.75 6.4 4.2 Oklahoma Stations used: AG.HHAR GS.KAN01 GS.KAN05 GS.KAN06 GS.KAN08 GS.KAN10 GS.KAN12 GS.KAN13 GS.KAN14 GS.KAN16 GS.KAN17 GS.KS20 GS.KS21 GS.OK025 GS.OK029 GS.OK030 GS.OK031 GS.OK032 GS.OK033 GS.OK034 GS.OK035 N4.T35B N4.U38B OK.BCOK OK.BLOK OK.CHOK OK.CROK OK.ELIS OK.FNO OK.GORE OK.HTCH OK.NOKA OK.OKCFA OK.X37A TA.TUL1 US.CBKS US.KSU1 Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.97e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.13 Z = 7 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 310 80 -15 NP2 43 75 -170 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.97e+22 3 357 N 0.00e+00 72 97 P -1.97e+22 18 266 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.95e+22 Mxy -2.40e+21 Mxz 1.55e+21 Myy -1.78e+22 Myz 5.62e+21 Mzz -1.75e+21 #### T ####### ######## ########### ############################ #############################- ----##########################---- --------######################------ ------------##################-------- ----------------##############---------- ------------------###########----------- ----------------------######-------------- -- -------------------###--------------- -- P --------------------#---------------- -- -------------------####-------------- ---------------------########----------- -------------------############--------- ----------------###############------- -------------###################---- ---------#######################-- ----########################## ############################ ###################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.75e+21 1.55e+21 -5.62e+21 1.55e+21 1.95e+22 2.40e+21 -5.62e+21 2.40e+21 -1.78e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20160708222938/index.html |
Jump to Navigation M4.1 - 31km NW of Fairview, Oklahoma IV DYFI? Moment Tensor Back to Scientific Summary Contributed by US1 last updated 2016-07-08 22:54:06 (UTC) The data below are the most preferred data available The data below have been reviewed by a scientist Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 2.251e+15 N-m Magnitude 4.2 Mwr Depth 7.0 km Percent DC 71 % Half Duration – Catalog US Data Source US1 Contributor US1 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 45 78 -170 NP2 313 80 -13 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.406e+15 N-m 2 359 N -0.351e+15 N-m 74 95 P -2.055e+15 N-m 16 269 |
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated.
Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 310 75 0 3.77 0.4001 WVFGRD96 2.0 130 90 15 3.92 0.5307 WVFGRD96 3.0 310 80 -20 3.99 0.5921 WVFGRD96 4.0 310 80 -20 4.03 0.6321 WVFGRD96 5.0 310 80 -15 4.06 0.6546 WVFGRD96 6.0 310 80 -15 4.09 0.6659 WVFGRD96 7.0 310 80 -15 4.13 0.6686 WVFGRD96 8.0 310 80 -15 4.17 0.6645 WVFGRD96 9.0 310 80 -15 4.19 0.6537 WVFGRD96 10.0 310 80 -15 4.21 0.6388 WVFGRD96 11.0 315 90 -15 4.22 0.6217 WVFGRD96 12.0 315 90 -15 4.24 0.6048 WVFGRD96 13.0 315 90 -15 4.25 0.5858 WVFGRD96 14.0 135 85 10 4.27 0.5686 WVFGRD96 15.0 135 85 10 4.28 0.5484 WVFGRD96 16.0 315 90 -10 4.29 0.5277 WVFGRD96 17.0 135 85 10 4.30 0.5084 WVFGRD96 18.0 315 90 -10 4.30 0.4869 WVFGRD96 19.0 135 85 10 4.31 0.4675 WVFGRD96 20.0 135 85 10 4.31 0.4472 WVFGRD96 21.0 315 90 -10 4.32 0.4274 WVFGRD96 22.0 135 85 10 4.32 0.4096 WVFGRD96 23.0 135 85 10 4.32 0.3933 WVFGRD96 24.0 135 80 10 4.33 0.3788 WVFGRD96 25.0 135 75 -15 4.33 0.3671 WVFGRD96 26.0 135 70 -10 4.34 0.3575 WVFGRD96 27.0 220 75 -5 4.33 0.3590 WVFGRD96 28.0 220 80 -5 4.34 0.3682 WVFGRD96 29.0 220 80 -5 4.35 0.3764
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 7.0 310 80 -15 4.13 0.6686
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00