The ANSS event ID is ak016690dapx and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak016690dapx/executive.
2016/05/15 05:51:00 63.077 -150.946 131.5 5.3 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2016/05/15 05:51:00:0 63.08 -150.95 131.5 5.3 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.CUT AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.FID AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.NEA2 AK.PAX AK.PPLA AK.RC01 AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.TRF AK.WRH AT.PMR AT.SVW2 AT.TTA IM.IL31 IU.COLA TA.H21K TA.H23K TA.H24K TA.I21K TA.I23K TA.J20K TA.K20K TA.L19K TA.M19K TA.M22K TA.N19K TA.O22K TA.POKR TA.TCOL Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 9.12e+23 dyne-cm Mw = 5.24 Z = 126 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 50 60 65 NP2 273 38 126 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 9.12e+23 65 274 N 0.00e+00 21 63 P -9.12e+23 12 158 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -7.49e+23 Mxy 2.95e+23 Mxz 1.93e+23 Myy 3.30e+22 Myz -4.13e+23 Mzz 7.16e+23 -------------- ---------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ----------#############----------# ------#######################-----## ----#############################-#### ---###############################--#### -################################-----## -############ #################-------## ############# T ################---------# ############# ###############----------- #############################------------- ##########################-------------- ########################---------------- #####################----------------- #################------------------- ###########----------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------- ------ ---------------- P --- ------------ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 7.16e+23 1.93e+23 4.13e+23 1.93e+23 -7.49e+23 -2.95e+23 4.13e+23 -2.95e+23 3.30e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20160515055100/index.html |
STK = 50 DIP = 60 RAKE = 65 MW = 5.24 HS = 126.0
The NDK file is 20160515055100.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2016/05/15 05:51:00:0 63.08 -150.95 131.5 5.3 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.CUT AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.FID AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.NEA2 AK.PAX AK.PPLA AK.RC01 AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.TRF AK.WRH AT.PMR AT.SVW2 AT.TTA IM.IL31 IU.COLA TA.H21K TA.H23K TA.H24K TA.I21K TA.I23K TA.J20K TA.K20K TA.L19K TA.M19K TA.M22K TA.N19K TA.O22K TA.POKR TA.TCOL Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 9.12e+23 dyne-cm Mw = 5.24 Z = 126 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 50 60 65 NP2 273 38 126 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 9.12e+23 65 274 N 0.00e+00 21 63 P -9.12e+23 12 158 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -7.49e+23 Mxy 2.95e+23 Mxz 1.93e+23 Myy 3.30e+22 Myz -4.13e+23 Mzz 7.16e+23 -------------- ---------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------------------ ----------#############----------# ------#######################-----## ----#############################-#### ---###############################--#### -################################-----## -############ #################-------## ############# T ################---------# ############# ###############----------- #############################------------- ##########################-------------- ########################---------------- #####################----------------- #################------------------- ###########----------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------- ------ ---------------- P --- ------------ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 7.16e+23 1.93e+23 4.13e+23 1.93e+23 -7.49e+23 -2.95e+23 4.13e+23 -2.95e+23 3.30e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20160515055100/index.html |
Body-wave Moment Tensor (Mwb) Moment 1.053e+17 N-m Magnitude 5.3 Mwb Depth 130.0 km Percent DC 87 % Half Duration – Catalog US Data Source US3 Contributor US3 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 266 32 123 NP2 48 64 71 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.087e+17 N-m 66 284 N -0.072e+17 N-m 17 57 P -1.015e+17 N-m 17 152 |
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 70.0 55 50 65 5.11 0.3255 WVFGRD96 72.0 50 55 60 5.13 0.3645 WVFGRD96 74.0 50 55 60 5.14 0.4045 WVFGRD96 76.0 50 55 60 5.15 0.4459 WVFGRD96 78.0 50 55 60 5.17 0.4790 WVFGRD96 80.0 50 55 60 5.17 0.4992 WVFGRD96 82.0 50 55 60 5.18 0.5133 WVFGRD96 84.0 50 55 60 5.18 0.5258 WVFGRD96 86.0 50 55 60 5.18 0.5361 WVFGRD96 88.0 50 55 60 5.19 0.5452 WVFGRD96 90.0 50 60 65 5.19 0.5541 WVFGRD96 92.0 50 60 65 5.20 0.5611 WVFGRD96 94.0 50 60 65 5.20 0.5676 WVFGRD96 96.0 50 60 65 5.20 0.5734 WVFGRD96 98.0 50 60 65 5.21 0.5794 WVFGRD96 100.0 50 60 65 5.21 0.5841 WVFGRD96 102.0 50 60 65 5.21 0.5885 WVFGRD96 104.0 50 60 65 5.21 0.5920 WVFGRD96 106.0 50 60 65 5.22 0.5949 WVFGRD96 108.0 50 60 65 5.22 0.5991 WVFGRD96 110.0 50 60 65 5.22 0.6010 WVFGRD96 112.0 50 60 65 5.22 0.6038 WVFGRD96 114.0 50 60 65 5.23 0.6062 WVFGRD96 116.0 50 60 65 5.23 0.6078 WVFGRD96 118.0 50 60 65 5.23 0.6097 WVFGRD96 120.0 50 60 65 5.23 0.6111 WVFGRD96 122.0 50 60 65 5.23 0.6120 WVFGRD96 124.0 50 60 65 5.24 0.6122 WVFGRD96 126.0 50 60 65 5.24 0.6129 WVFGRD96 128.0 50 60 70 5.24 0.6121 WVFGRD96 130.0 50 60 70 5.24 0.6128 WVFGRD96 132.0 50 60 70 5.25 0.6113 WVFGRD96 134.0 50 60 70 5.25 0.6104 WVFGRD96 136.0 50 60 70 5.25 0.6090 WVFGRD96 138.0 50 60 70 5.25 0.6071 WVFGRD96 140.0 50 60 70 5.25 0.6059 WVFGRD96 142.0 50 60 70 5.25 0.6026 WVFGRD96 144.0 50 60 70 5.26 0.6011 WVFGRD96 146.0 50 55 65 5.26 0.5982 WVFGRD96 148.0 50 55 65 5.26 0.5956
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 126.0 50 60 65 5.24 0.6129
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -50 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00