The ANSS event ID is usc000rb71 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usc000rb71/executive.
2014/06/05 05:44:27 61.173 -140.279 10.0 5.1 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2014/06/05 05:44:27:0 61.17 -140.28 10.0 5.1 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.BAL AK.BARN AK.BESE AK.CCB AK.DHY AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.FID
AK.GHO AK.GLB AK.GLI AK.HARP AK.HDA AK.HIN AK.JIS AK.KNK
AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MESA AK.PIN AK.PPD AK.RAG AK.RC01 AK.RIDG
AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SWD AK.TRF AK.VRDI AK.WAX
AK.WRH AK.YAH AT.MENT AT.PMR AT.SIT AT.SKAG AT.YKU2 CN.DAWY
CN.HYT CN.WHY IM.IL31 IU.COLA US.EGAK
Filtering commands used:
cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.90e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 5.06
Z = 14 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 70 80 20
NP2 336 70 169
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.90e+23 21 295
N 0.00e+00 68 96
P -4.90e+23 7 202
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -3.42e+23
Mxy -3.29e+23
Mxz 1.21e+23
Myy 2.85e+23
Myz -1.29e+23
Mzz 5.73e+22
--------------
#####-----------------
##########------------------
############------------------
################------------------
##################------------------
## ###############------------------
### T ################-----------------#
### #################-------------####
#########################---------########
##########################----############
##########################-###############
#####################------###############
##############-------------#############
######----------------------############
---------------------------###########
--------------------------##########
--------------------------########
------------------------######
----- ---------------#####
-- P ---------------##
-------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
5.73e+22 1.21e+23 1.29e+23
1.21e+23 -3.42e+23 3.29e+23
1.29e+23 3.29e+23 2.85e+23
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140605054427/index.html
|
STK = 70
DIP = 80
RAKE = 20
MW = 5.06
HS = 14.0
The NDK file is 20140605054427.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2014/06/05 05:44:27:0 61.17 -140.28 10.0 5.1 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.BAL AK.BARN AK.BESE AK.CCB AK.DHY AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.FID
AK.GHO AK.GLB AK.GLI AK.HARP AK.HDA AK.HIN AK.JIS AK.KNK
AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MESA AK.PIN AK.PPD AK.RAG AK.RC01 AK.RIDG
AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SWD AK.TRF AK.VRDI AK.WAX
AK.WRH AK.YAH AT.MENT AT.PMR AT.SIT AT.SKAG AT.YKU2 CN.DAWY
CN.HYT CN.WHY IM.IL31 IU.COLA US.EGAK
Filtering commands used:
cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.90e+23 dyne-cm
Mw = 5.06
Z = 14 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 70 80 20
NP2 336 70 169
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.90e+23 21 295
N 0.00e+00 68 96
P -4.90e+23 7 202
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -3.42e+23
Mxy -3.29e+23
Mxz 1.21e+23
Myy 2.85e+23
Myz -1.29e+23
Mzz 5.73e+22
--------------
#####-----------------
##########------------------
############------------------
################------------------
##################------------------
## ###############------------------
### T ################-----------------#
### #################-------------####
#########################---------########
##########################----############
##########################-###############
#####################------###############
##############-------------#############
######----------------------############
---------------------------###########
--------------------------##########
--------------------------########
------------------------######
----- ---------------#####
-- P ---------------##
-------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
5.73e+22 1.21e+23 1.29e+23
1.21e+23 -3.42e+23 3.29e+23
1.29e+23 3.29e+23 2.85e+23
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140605054427/index.html
|
June 5, 2014, SOUTHERN YUKON TERRITORY, CANADA, MW=5.2
Goran Ekstrom
CENTROID-MOMENT-TENSOR SOLUTION
GCMT EVENT: C201406050544A
DATA: IU MN II G GE IC CU LD DK
KP
L.P.BODY WAVES: 70S, 98C, T= 40
SURFACE WAVES: 144S, 275C, T= 50
TIMESTAMP: Q-20140605094736
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME: 05:44:33.9 0.2
LAT:61.32N 0.01;LON:140.27W 0.02
DEP: 23.9 0.9;TRIANG HDUR: 1.0
MOMENT TENSOR: SCALE 10**24 D-CM
RR=-0.052 0.022; TT=-0.495 0.019
PP= 0.547 0.018; RT= 0.093 0.024
RP= 0.071 0.025; TP= 0.693 0.014
PRINCIPAL AXES:
1.(T) VAL= 0.905;PLG= 6;AZM=297
2.(N) -0.060; 83; 86
3.(P) -0.844; 4; 206
BEST DBLE.COUPLE:M0= 8.74*10**23
NP1: STRIKE=341;DIP=83;SLIP= 178
NP2: STRIKE= 72;DIP=88;SLIP= 7
-----------
#####--------------
########---------------
###########----------------
###########----------------
T ############----------------
############---------------#
#################---------#######
##################--#############
###############---###############
#########----------##############
##----------------#############
-------------------############
------------------###########
------------------#########
--- ----------#######
- P -----------####
-----------
|
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 65 85 0 4.66 0.2904
WVFGRD96 2.0 65 85 5 4.77 0.3728
WVFGRD96 3.0 65 80 5 4.82 0.4105
WVFGRD96 4.0 65 80 5 4.86 0.4390
WVFGRD96 5.0 65 80 10 4.89 0.4631
WVFGRD96 6.0 70 75 20 4.92 0.4877
WVFGRD96 7.0 70 80 20 4.95 0.5091
WVFGRD96 8.0 70 75 20 4.98 0.5339
WVFGRD96 9.0 70 75 20 5.00 0.5482
WVFGRD96 10.0 70 75 20 5.02 0.5585
WVFGRD96 11.0 70 80 20 5.03 0.5661
WVFGRD96 12.0 70 80 20 5.04 0.5712
WVFGRD96 13.0 70 80 20 5.05 0.5737
WVFGRD96 14.0 70 80 20 5.06 0.5738
WVFGRD96 15.0 70 80 15 5.07 0.5721
WVFGRD96 16.0 70 80 15 5.08 0.5693
WVFGRD96 17.0 70 80 15 5.09 0.5660
WVFGRD96 18.0 70 80 15 5.09 0.5618
WVFGRD96 19.0 70 80 15 5.10 0.5568
WVFGRD96 20.0 70 85 20 5.11 0.5520
WVFGRD96 21.0 70 85 20 5.12 0.5474
WVFGRD96 22.0 70 85 20 5.13 0.5422
WVFGRD96 23.0 245 90 -20 5.14 0.5355
WVFGRD96 24.0 70 85 20 5.14 0.5307
WVFGRD96 25.0 245 90 -20 5.15 0.5230
WVFGRD96 26.0 245 90 -20 5.16 0.5162
WVFGRD96 27.0 70 85 20 5.16 0.5116
WVFGRD96 28.0 70 85 20 5.17 0.5048
WVFGRD96 29.0 250 90 -20 5.18 0.4967
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 14.0 70 80 20 5.06 0.5738
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00