Location
SLU Location
To check the ANSS location or to compare the observed P-wave first motions to the moment tensor solution, P- and S-wave first arrival times were manually read together with the P-wave first motions. The subsequent output of the program elocate is given in the file elocate.txt. The first motion plot is shown below.
Location ANSS
The ANSS event ID is usc000nkq4 and the event page is at
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usc000nkq4/executive.
2014/03/22 03:05:59 35.888 -97.299 4.5 3.9 Oklahoma
Focal Mechanism
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2014/03/22 03:05:59:0 35.89 -97.30 4.5 3.9 Oklahoma
Stations used:
AG.FCAR AG.HHAR AG.LCAR AG.WHAR AG.WLAR GS.OK025 GS.OK026
GS.OK027 GS.OK028 GS.OK029 IU.CCM N4.N33B N4.P38B N4.R32B
N4.R40B N4.S39B N4.T35B N4.T42B N4.U38B N4.Z35B N4.Z38B
NM.MGMO NM.UALR OK.BCOK OK.CROK OK.FNO OK.U32A OK.X34A
TA.KSCO TA.TUL1 TA.U40A TA.W39A TA.W41B TA.WHTX TA.X40A
TA.X43A TA.Z41A US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.MIAR US.WMOK ZW.AZWP
ZW.AZWR
Filtering commands used:
cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 6.53e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.81
Z = 4 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 115 85 -15
NP2 206 75 -175
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 6.53e+21 7 162
N 0.00e+00 74 277
P -6.53e+21 14 70
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 5.06e+21
Mxy -3.93e+21
Mxz -1.28e+21
Myy -4.76e+21
Myz -1.20e+21
Mzz -2.94e+20
##############
###################---
####################--------
###################-----------
####################--------------
####################----------------
-##################--------------- -
-----##############---------------- P --
--------##########----------------- --
------------######------------------------
----------------#-------------------------
----------------####----------------------
----------------########------------------
--------------#############-------------
-------------###################--------
------------########################--
----------##########################
---------#########################
------########################
-----#######################
--############## ###
############ T
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-2.94e+20 -1.28e+21 1.20e+21
-1.28e+21 5.06e+21 3.93e+21
1.20e+21 3.93e+21 -4.76e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140322030559/index.html
|
Preferred Solution
The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is
STK = 115
DIP = 85
RAKE = -15
MW = 3.81
HS = 4.0
The NDK file is 20140322030559.ndk
The waveform inversion is preferred.
Moment Tensor Comparison
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
| SLU |
USGSMT |
SLUFM |
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2014/03/22 03:05:59:0 35.89 -97.30 4.5 3.9 Oklahoma
Stations used:
AG.FCAR AG.HHAR AG.LCAR AG.WHAR AG.WLAR GS.OK025 GS.OK026
GS.OK027 GS.OK028 GS.OK029 IU.CCM N4.N33B N4.P38B N4.R32B
N4.R40B N4.S39B N4.T35B N4.T42B N4.U38B N4.Z35B N4.Z38B
NM.MGMO NM.UALR OK.BCOK OK.CROK OK.FNO OK.U32A OK.X34A
TA.KSCO TA.TUL1 TA.U40A TA.W39A TA.W41B TA.WHTX TA.X40A
TA.X43A TA.Z41A US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.MIAR US.WMOK ZW.AZWP
ZW.AZWR
Filtering commands used:
cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 6.53e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.81
Z = 4 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 115 85 -15
NP2 206 75 -175
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 6.53e+21 7 162
N 0.00e+00 74 277
P -6.53e+21 14 70
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 5.06e+21
Mxy -3.93e+21
Mxz -1.28e+21
Myy -4.76e+21
Myz -1.20e+21
Mzz -2.94e+20
##############
###################---
####################--------
###################-----------
####################--------------
####################----------------
-##################--------------- -
-----##############---------------- P --
--------##########----------------- --
------------######------------------------
----------------#-------------------------
----------------####----------------------
----------------########------------------
--------------#############-------------
-------------###################--------
------------########################--
----------##########################
---------#########################
------########################
-----#######################
--############## ###
############ T
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-2.94e+20 -1.28e+21 1.20e+21
-1.28e+21 5.06e+21 3.93e+21
1.20e+21 3.93e+21 -4.76e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140322030559/index.html
|
Moment
8.71e+14 N-m
Magnitude
3.9
Percent DC
94%
Depth
7.0 km
Updated
2014-03-22 04:22:05 UTC
Author
us
Catalog
us
Contributor
us
Code
us_c000nkq4_mwr
Principal Axes
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 8.815 19 163
N -0.222 66 25
P -8.592 15 258
Nodal Planes
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 210 88 156
NP2 301 66 2
|
|
First motions and takeoff angles from an elocate run.
|
Magnitudes
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula
for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
mLg Magnitude
Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated.
Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
ML Magnitude
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Context
The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.
Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the
stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 115 80 -15 3.65 0.4169
WVFGRD96 2.0 115 85 -25 3.76 0.5032
WVFGRD96 3.0 295 90 15 3.79 0.5255
WVFGRD96 4.0 115 85 -15 3.81 0.5328
WVFGRD96 5.0 295 90 10 3.83 0.5249
WVFGRD96 6.0 300 85 15 3.85 0.5154
WVFGRD96 7.0 300 85 10 3.87 0.5055
WVFGRD96 8.0 300 85 15 3.90 0.4959
WVFGRD96 9.0 300 85 15 3.92 0.4791
WVFGRD96 10.0 300 85 15 3.93 0.4621
WVFGRD96 11.0 300 80 20 3.95 0.4480
WVFGRD96 12.0 300 80 20 3.97 0.4392
WVFGRD96 13.0 300 80 25 3.98 0.4296
WVFGRD96 14.0 300 85 25 3.98 0.4216
WVFGRD96 15.0 300 85 25 3.99 0.4130
WVFGRD96 16.0 115 90 -25 3.99 0.4034
WVFGRD96 17.0 115 90 -25 4.00 0.3950
WVFGRD96 18.0 295 90 25 4.01 0.3866
WVFGRD96 19.0 115 90 -25 4.02 0.3778
WVFGRD96 20.0 115 85 -25 4.01 0.3688
WVFGRD96 21.0 115 85 -25 4.03 0.3608
WVFGRD96 22.0 115 85 -25 4.03 0.3519
WVFGRD96 23.0 115 85 -25 4.04 0.3441
WVFGRD96 24.0 295 90 25 4.06 0.3339
WVFGRD96 25.0 115 85 -25 4.05 0.3293
WVFGRD96 26.0 115 85 -25 4.06 0.3227
WVFGRD96 27.0 115 85 -25 4.07 0.3163
WVFGRD96 28.0 115 85 -25 4.07 0.3107
WVFGRD96 29.0 295 90 25 4.09 0.3031
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 4.0 115 85 -15 3.81 0.5328
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted.
Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off.
A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 180
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
|
|
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.
|
|
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms.
Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.
|
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
- The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
- The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
- The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the
same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion
(assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the
P arrival time)
Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Velocity Model
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows
(The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Last Changed Fri Apr 26 03:59:13 PM CDT 2024
