The ANSS event ID is ak01439k6eg1 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak01439k6eg1/executive.
2014/03/12 08:43:35 59.288 -153.169 85.9 4.6 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/03/12 08:43:35:0 59.29 -153.17 85.9 4.6 Alaska Stations used: AK.BRLK AK.CNP AK.GHO AK.HOM AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SII AK.SWD AT.OHAK AT.PMR AT.SVW2 Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.32e+23 dyne-cm Mw = 4.68 Z = 85 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 65 75 45 NP2 320 47 159 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.32e+23 42 293 N 0.00e+00 43 80 P -1.32e+23 17 187 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.07e+23 Mxy -4.00e+22 Mxz 6.30e+22 Myy 6.06e+22 Myz -5.60e+22 Mzz 4.66e+22 -------------- ---------------------- #########------------------- ###############--------------- ####################-------------- #######################------------- ##########################-----------# ####### ###################--------### ####### T ####################-----##### ######## #####################-######### ###############################--######### ############################------######## ########################-----------####### ###################---------------###### ##############--------------------###### ######---------------------------##### --------------------------------#### -------------------------------### -----------------------------# ----------- -------------# -------- P ----------- ---- ------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 4.66e+22 6.30e+22 5.60e+22 6.30e+22 -1.07e+23 4.00e+22 5.60e+22 4.00e+22 6.06e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140312084335/index.html |
STK = 65 DIP = 75 RAKE = 45 MW = 4.68 HS = 85.0
The NDK file is 20140312084335.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/03/12 08:43:35:0 59.29 -153.17 85.9 4.6 Alaska Stations used: AK.BRLK AK.CNP AK.GHO AK.HOM AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.RC01 AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SII AK.SWD AT.OHAK AT.PMR AT.SVW2 Filtering commands used: cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.32e+23 dyne-cm Mw = 4.68 Z = 85 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 65 75 45 NP2 320 47 159 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.32e+23 42 293 N 0.00e+00 43 80 P -1.32e+23 17 187 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.07e+23 Mxy -4.00e+22 Mxz 6.30e+22 Myy 6.06e+22 Myz -5.60e+22 Mzz 4.66e+22 -------------- ---------------------- #########------------------- ###############--------------- ####################-------------- #######################------------- ##########################-----------# ####### ###################--------### ####### T ####################-----##### ######## #####################-######### ###############################--######### ############################------######## ########################-----------####### ###################---------------###### ##############--------------------###### ######---------------------------##### --------------------------------#### -------------------------------### -----------------------------# ----------- -------------# -------- P ----------- ---- ------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 4.66e+22 6.30e+22 5.60e+22 6.30e+22 -1.07e+23 4.00e+22 5.60e+22 4.00e+22 6.06e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20140312084335/index.html |
Moment 1.20e+16 N-m Magnitude 4.7 Percent DC 89% Depth 79.0 km Updated 2014-03-12 15:19:47 UTC Author us Catalog us Contributor us Code us_c000n8ry_mwr Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.233 32 292 N -0.067 53 78 P -1.166 17 191 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 65 80 36 NP2 327 54 168 |
|
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 0.5 340 80 -20 3.79 0.2283 WVFGRD96 1.0 165 85 5 3.81 0.2464 WVFGRD96 2.0 345 90 -10 3.92 0.3177 WVFGRD96 3.0 160 75 -15 3.96 0.3400 WVFGRD96 4.0 345 90 -15 3.99 0.3556 WVFGRD96 5.0 165 75 10 4.02 0.3670 WVFGRD96 6.0 165 75 10 4.04 0.3760 WVFGRD96 7.0 165 75 10 4.06 0.3804 WVFGRD96 8.0 255 85 -5 4.09 0.3966 WVFGRD96 9.0 255 85 -5 4.11 0.4125 WVFGRD96 10.0 80 90 10 4.15 0.4258 WVFGRD96 11.0 80 90 0 4.17 0.4388 WVFGRD96 12.0 80 90 0 4.18 0.4506 WVFGRD96 13.0 80 90 0 4.20 0.4612 WVFGRD96 14.0 255 90 0 4.20 0.4707 WVFGRD96 15.0 75 90 5 4.21 0.4794 WVFGRD96 16.0 75 90 0 4.22 0.4878 WVFGRD96 17.0 75 80 0 4.24 0.4975 WVFGRD96 18.0 75 80 0 4.25 0.5074 WVFGRD96 19.0 75 80 0 4.26 0.5171 WVFGRD96 20.0 75 80 0 4.27 0.5267 WVFGRD96 21.0 75 80 0 4.29 0.5357 WVFGRD96 22.0 75 80 0 4.30 0.5446 WVFGRD96 23.0 75 80 0 4.31 0.5540 WVFGRD96 24.0 75 80 0 4.32 0.5632 WVFGRD96 25.0 75 80 0 4.33 0.5726 WVFGRD96 26.0 75 80 0 4.34 0.5812 WVFGRD96 27.0 75 80 0 4.35 0.5889 WVFGRD96 28.0 75 80 0 4.36 0.5959 WVFGRD96 29.0 75 80 5 4.37 0.6027 WVFGRD96 30.0 75 80 5 4.38 0.6087 WVFGRD96 31.0 70 80 0 4.38 0.6145 WVFGRD96 32.0 70 80 0 4.39 0.6206 WVFGRD96 33.0 70 80 0 4.40 0.6258 WVFGRD96 34.0 70 80 0 4.41 0.6305 WVFGRD96 35.0 70 80 0 4.42 0.6351 WVFGRD96 36.0 70 80 0 4.43 0.6398 WVFGRD96 37.0 70 80 0 4.44 0.6440 WVFGRD96 38.0 70 80 0 4.46 0.6479 WVFGRD96 39.0 65 80 0 4.47 0.6513 WVFGRD96 40.0 65 75 -5 4.49 0.6554 WVFGRD96 41.0 65 75 -5 4.50 0.6561 WVFGRD96 42.0 65 75 -5 4.51 0.6565 WVFGRD96 43.0 65 75 -5 4.52 0.6569 WVFGRD96 44.0 65 75 -5 4.53 0.6576 WVFGRD96 45.0 65 75 -5 4.54 0.6582 WVFGRD96 46.0 65 75 5 4.54 0.6592 WVFGRD96 47.0 65 75 5 4.55 0.6608 WVFGRD96 48.0 65 75 5 4.55 0.6624 WVFGRD96 49.0 65 75 5 4.56 0.6639 WVFGRD96 50.0 65 75 5 4.57 0.6654 WVFGRD96 51.0 65 75 10 4.57 0.6669 WVFGRD96 52.0 65 80 15 4.58 0.6683 WVFGRD96 53.0 65 80 20 4.58 0.6700 WVFGRD96 54.0 65 80 20 4.59 0.6727 WVFGRD96 55.0 65 80 20 4.59 0.6749 WVFGRD96 56.0 65 80 20 4.60 0.6767 WVFGRD96 57.0 65 75 20 4.60 0.6783 WVFGRD96 58.0 65 80 25 4.61 0.6809 WVFGRD96 59.0 65 75 25 4.61 0.6841 WVFGRD96 60.0 65 75 25 4.62 0.6863 WVFGRD96 61.0 65 75 25 4.62 0.6872 WVFGRD96 62.0 65 75 30 4.63 0.6902 WVFGRD96 63.0 65 75 30 4.63 0.6932 WVFGRD96 64.0 65 75 30 4.63 0.6945 WVFGRD96 65.0 65 75 30 4.63 0.6963 WVFGRD96 66.0 65 75 35 4.64 0.6983 WVFGRD96 67.0 65 75 35 4.64 0.6995 WVFGRD96 68.0 65 75 35 4.65 0.7013 WVFGRD96 69.0 65 75 35 4.65 0.7028 WVFGRD96 70.0 65 75 35 4.65 0.7028 WVFGRD96 71.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7056 WVFGRD96 72.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7061 WVFGRD96 73.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7061 WVFGRD96 74.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7082 WVFGRD96 75.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7073 WVFGRD96 76.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7092 WVFGRD96 77.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7092 WVFGRD96 78.0 65 75 40 4.66 0.7094 WVFGRD96 79.0 65 75 45 4.67 0.7102 WVFGRD96 80.0 65 75 45 4.67 0.7100 WVFGRD96 81.0 65 75 45 4.67 0.7100 WVFGRD96 82.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7098 WVFGRD96 83.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7106 WVFGRD96 84.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7092 WVFGRD96 85.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7106 WVFGRD96 86.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7086 WVFGRD96 87.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7101 WVFGRD96 88.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7077 WVFGRD96 89.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7096 WVFGRD96 90.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7072 WVFGRD96 91.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7086 WVFGRD96 92.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7071 WVFGRD96 93.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7072 WVFGRD96 94.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7066 WVFGRD96 95.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7062 WVFGRD96 96.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7059 WVFGRD96 97.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7048 WVFGRD96 98.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7048 WVFGRD96 99.0 65 75 50 4.69 0.7030
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 85.0 65 75 45 4.68 0.7106
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 180 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00