The ANSS event ID is uu60041537 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/uu60041537/executive.
2013/10/17 16:19:19 41.603 -111.684 11.4 3.63 Utah
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2013/10/17 16:19:19:0 41.60 -111.68 11.4 3.6 Utah
Stations used:
IW.FXWY IW.IMW IW.MOOW IW.REDW IW.SNOW IW.TPAW LB.BMN
NN.SHP NN.WTNK TA.H17A TA.O20A TA.Q24A TA.R11A US.AHID
US.DUG US.TPNV UU.BGU UU.BRPU UU.CTU UU.HVU UU.JLU UU.MTPU
UU.NOQ UU.PSUT UU.RDMU UU.SPU UU.SRU UU.SZCU UU.TCRU
UU.VRUT UW.BRAN WY.YHB WY.YHH WY.YHL WY.YMR WY.YNM WY.YPP
WY.YTP
Filtering commands used:
cut a -30 a 210
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 3.63e+21 dyne-cm
Mw = 3.64
Z = 14 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 351 70 -86
NP2 160 20 -100
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 3.63e+21 25 78
N 0.00e+00 3 169
P -3.63e+21 65 267
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 1.30e+20
Mxy 5.73e+20
Mxz 3.80e+20
Myy 2.17e+21
Myz 2.78e+21
Mzz -2.30e+21
-----#########
#---------############
##------------##############
##--------------##############
###----------------###############
###------------------###############
###-------------------################
###---------------------################
###---------------------########## ###
####----------------------######### T ####
####--------- ----------######### ####
####--------- P ----------################
####--------- ----------################
####----------------------##############
####----------------------##############
####---------------------#############
####--------------------############
#####------------------###########
####----------------##########
######-------------#########
######----------######
#######----###
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-2.30e+21 3.80e+20 -2.78e+21
3.80e+20 1.30e+20 -5.73e+20
-2.78e+21 -5.73e+20 2.17e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20131017161919/index.html
|
STK = 160
DIP = 20
RAKE = -100
MW = 3.64
HS = 14.0
The NDK file is 20131017161919.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut a -30 a 210 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 0.5 355 40 -90 3.21 0.2242
WVFGRD96 1.0 160 45 90 3.19 0.1755
WVFGRD96 2.0 350 40 -90 3.37 0.2375
WVFGRD96 3.0 75 50 15 3.38 0.1953
WVFGRD96 4.0 250 25 -10 3.42 0.2466
WVFGRD96 5.0 240 20 -20 3.44 0.3081
WVFGRD96 6.0 235 20 -25 3.45 0.3589
WVFGRD96 7.0 235 25 -30 3.47 0.3987
WVFGRD96 8.0 175 15 -85 3.56 0.4291
WVFGRD96 9.0 190 20 -70 3.57 0.4599
WVFGRD96 10.0 170 20 -90 3.59 0.4838
WVFGRD96 11.0 165 20 -95 3.60 0.5009
WVFGRD96 12.0 350 70 -90 3.61 0.5115
WVFGRD96 13.0 165 20 -95 3.63 0.5167
WVFGRD96 14.0 160 20 -100 3.64 0.5169
WVFGRD96 15.0 350 70 -85 3.65 0.5132
WVFGRD96 16.0 155 20 -105 3.66 0.5063
WVFGRD96 17.0 350 80 -65 3.69 0.4979
WVFGRD96 18.0 350 80 -65 3.70 0.4875
WVFGRD96 19.0 350 80 -65 3.71 0.4749
WVFGRD96 20.0 350 80 -65 3.72 0.4606
WVFGRD96 21.0 350 80 -70 3.73 0.4454
WVFGRD96 22.0 350 80 -70 3.74 0.4285
WVFGRD96 23.0 350 80 -70 3.75 0.4110
WVFGRD96 24.0 350 80 -65 3.76 0.3930
WVFGRD96 25.0 350 80 -70 3.76 0.3751
WVFGRD96 26.0 350 80 -65 3.77 0.3571
WVFGRD96 27.0 350 80 -65 3.78 0.3392
WVFGRD96 28.0 350 80 -65 3.78 0.3215
WVFGRD96 29.0 345 80 -65 3.78 0.3042
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 14.0 160 20 -100 3.64 0.5169
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut a -30 a 210 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
Model after 8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00