The ANSS event ID is ak012b7m4lyf and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak012b7m4lyf/executive.
2012/08/31 05:03:55 65.971 -147.755 12.6 4.1 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2012/08/31 05:03:55:0 65.97 -147.76 12.6 4.1 Alaska Stations used: AK.BMR AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.COLD AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.DOT AK.FID AK.GLI AK.GLM AK.KLU AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.NEA AK.PAX AK.PPD AK.PPLA AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SKN AK.SSN AK.WRH AT.PMR CN.DAWY IU.COLA US.EGAK Filtering commands used: hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.26e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.00 Z = 14 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 88 80 170 NP2 180 80 10 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.26e+22 14 44 N 0.00e+00 76 225 P -1.26e+22 0 134 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -2.13e+15 Mxy 1.22e+22 Mxz 2.15e+21 Myy -7.48e+20 Myz 2.05e+21 Mzz 7.48e+20 -------####### ----------############ -------------############### -------------############## ---------------############## T ## ----------------############## ### -----------------##################### ------------------###################### ------------------###################### ------------------######################## ------------------######################## #-----------------##################------ ##################------------------------ ##################---------------------- ##################---------------------- #################--------------------- ################-------------------- ###############--------------- - #############--------------- P #############-------------- ##########------------ #######------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 7.48e+20 2.15e+21 -2.05e+21 2.15e+21 -2.13e+15 -1.22e+22 -2.05e+21 -1.22e+22 -7.48e+20 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20120831050355/index.html |
STK = 180 DIP = 80 RAKE = 10 MW = 4.00 HS = 14.0
The NDK file is 20120831050355.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2012/08/31 05:03:55:0 65.97 -147.76 12.6 4.1 Alaska Stations used: AK.BMR AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.COLD AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.DOT AK.FID AK.GLI AK.GLM AK.KLU AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.NEA AK.PAX AK.PPD AK.PPLA AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.SKN AK.SSN AK.WRH AT.PMR CN.DAWY IU.COLA US.EGAK Filtering commands used: hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.26e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.00 Z = 14 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 88 80 170 NP2 180 80 10 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.26e+22 14 44 N 0.00e+00 76 225 P -1.26e+22 0 134 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -2.13e+15 Mxy 1.22e+22 Mxz 2.15e+21 Myy -7.48e+20 Myz 2.05e+21 Mzz 7.48e+20 -------####### ----------############ -------------############### -------------############## ---------------############## T ## ----------------############## ### -----------------##################### ------------------###################### ------------------###################### ------------------######################## ------------------######################## #-----------------##################------ ##################------------------------ ##################---------------------- ##################---------------------- #################--------------------- ################-------------------- ###############--------------- - #############--------------- P #############-------------- ##########------------ #######------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 7.48e+20 2.15e+21 -2.05e+21 2.15e+21 -2.13e+15 -1.22e+22 -2.05e+21 -1.22e+22 -7.48e+20 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20120831050355/index.html |
USGS/SLU Regional Moment Solution 12/08/31 05:03:55.00 Epicenter: 65.978 -147.800 MW 4.0 USGS/SLU REGIONAL MOMENT TENSOR Depth 17 No. of sta: 35 Moment Tensor; Scale 10**15 Nm Mrr= 0.03 Mtt= 0.12 Mpp=-0.15 Mrt= 0.17 Mrp= 0.30 Mtp=-1.15 Principal axes: T Val= 1.14 Plg= 4 Azm=222 N 0.11 75 327 P -1.25 14 131 Best Double Couple:Mo=1.2*10**15 NP1:Strike=176 Dip=83 Slip= -13 NP2: 268 77 -172 |
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 0.5 0 80 -25 3.87 0.4589 WVFGRD96 1.0 0 75 -15 3.87 0.4758 WVFGRD96 2.0 -5 80 -20 3.89 0.5018 WVFGRD96 3.0 175 80 -10 3.90 0.5183 WVFGRD96 4.0 175 80 -10 3.91 0.5291 WVFGRD96 5.0 175 80 -10 3.92 0.5360 WVFGRD96 6.0 180 80 -5 3.93 0.5408 WVFGRD96 7.0 180 80 20 3.95 0.5475 WVFGRD96 8.0 180 80 20 3.96 0.5560 WVFGRD96 9.0 180 80 15 3.97 0.5634 WVFGRD96 10.0 180 80 15 3.98 0.5701 WVFGRD96 11.0 180 80 15 3.99 0.5746 WVFGRD96 12.0 180 80 10 3.99 0.5772 WVFGRD96 13.0 180 80 10 4.00 0.5790 WVFGRD96 14.0 180 80 10 4.00 0.5794 WVFGRD96 15.0 180 80 10 4.01 0.5787 WVFGRD96 16.0 180 80 10 4.02 0.5770 WVFGRD96 17.0 175 85 5 4.03 0.5750 WVFGRD96 18.0 175 85 5 4.03 0.5728 WVFGRD96 19.0 175 85 5 4.04 0.5701 WVFGRD96 20.0 175 85 5 4.05 0.5666 WVFGRD96 21.0 175 85 0 4.05 0.5629 WVFGRD96 22.0 175 85 0 4.06 0.5587 WVFGRD96 23.0 175 85 0 4.06 0.5538 WVFGRD96 24.0 175 85 0 4.07 0.5485 WVFGRD96 25.0 175 85 0 4.08 0.5426 WVFGRD96 26.0 0 80 5 4.08 0.5344 WVFGRD96 27.0 0 80 5 4.08 0.5285 WVFGRD96 28.0 0 80 5 4.09 0.5223 WVFGRD96 29.0 0 80 5 4.10 0.5161
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 14.0 180 80 10 4.00 0.5794
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.0000 5.0000 2.8900 2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 9.0000 6.1000 3.5200 2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.0000 6.4000 3.7000 2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 20.0000 6.7000 3.8700 2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 8.1500 4.7000 3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00