Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is usp000jafh and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000jafh/executive.

2011/11/06 17:52:34 35.494 -96.828 3.1 3.4 Oklahoma

Focal Mechanism

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2011/11/06 17:52:34:0 35.49 -96.83 3.1 3.4 Oklahoma Stations used: TA.136A TA.Q35A TA.R35A TA.R36A TA.R37A TA.S35A TA.S36A TA.T34A TA.T35A TA.T36A TA.T37A TA.T38A TA.TUL1 TA.U32A TA.U35A TA.U36A TA.U38A TA.U39A TA.V35A TA.V36A TA.V37A TA.V38A TA.V40A TA.W35A TA.W36A TA.W37B TA.W38A TA.W39A TA.W40A TA.X35A TA.X36A TA.X37A TA.X39A TA.Y35A TA.Y36A TA.Y37A US.KSU1 US.MIAR Filtering commands used: hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.76e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.43 Z = 3 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 54 85 165 NP2 145 75 5 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.76e+21 14 8 N 0.00e+00 74 216 P -1.76e+21 7 100 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.56e+21 Mxy 5.43e+20 Mxz 4.47e+20 Myy -1.64e+21 Myz -1.51e+20 Mzz 7.66e+19 ######## ### ############ T ####### --############# ########## ----########################## ------###########################- --------#########################--- ----------#####################------- ------------##################---------- -------------###############------------ ---------------############--------------- ----------------########------------------ -----------------#####----------------- ------------------#-------------------- P ----------------###------------------- -------------#######-------------------- ---------############----------------- -----################--------------- -#####################------------ ######################-------- ########################---- ###################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 7.66e+19 4.47e+20 1.51e+20 4.47e+20 1.56e+21 -5.43e+20 1.51e+20 -5.43e+20 -1.64e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20111106175234/index.html

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is

      STK = 145
      DIP = 75
     RAKE = 5
       MW = 3.43
       HS = 3.0

The NDK file is 20111106175234.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and M_L by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for M_L is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined M_L. The defined M_L uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

Context

The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.

Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2

The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    0.5   145    85   -10   3.29 0.4586
WVFGRD96    1.0   145    90     0   3.32 0.4840
WVFGRD96    2.0   145    85     5   3.39 0.5494
WVFGRD96    3.0   145    75     5   3.43 0.5519
WVFGRD96    4.0   145    65     5   3.47 0.5454
WVFGRD96    5.0   140    55    -5   3.52 0.5396
WVFGRD96    6.0   140    55     0   3.53 0.5335
WVFGRD96    7.0   140    60     0   3.54 0.5285
WVFGRD96    8.0   140    55     0   3.57 0.5221
WVFGRD96    9.0   140    55     5   3.59 0.5140
WVFGRD96   10.0   140    55     5   3.59 0.5076
WVFGRD96   11.0   145    60    25   3.61 0.5026
WVFGRD96   12.0   145    60    25   3.61 0.5001
WVFGRD96   13.0   145    60    25   3.62 0.4969
WVFGRD96   14.0   150    55    25   3.62 0.4934
WVFGRD96   15.0   150    55    25   3.62 0.4890
WVFGRD96   16.0   140    80   -30   3.59 0.4848
WVFGRD96   17.0   140    80   -30   3.60 0.4852
WVFGRD96   18.0   140    80   -30   3.61 0.4843
WVFGRD96   19.0   140    80   -30   3.61 0.4826
WVFGRD96   20.0   140    80   -30   3.62 0.4797
WVFGRD96   21.0   145    85   -30   3.63 0.4766
WVFGRD96   22.0   145    90   -30   3.63 0.4737
WVFGRD96   23.0   325    90    30   3.64 0.4704
WVFGRD96   24.0   325    90    30   3.65 0.4667
WVFGRD96   25.0   325    90    30   3.65 0.4623
WVFGRD96   26.0   325    85    25   3.66 0.4577
WVFGRD96   27.0   325    85    25   3.66 0.4534
WVFGRD96   28.0   325    85    25   3.67 0.4484
WVFGRD96   29.0   330    80    25   3.68 0.4434

The best solution is

WVFGRD96    3.0   145    75     5   3.43 0.5519

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is

Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.06 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2

Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion (assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the P arrival time)

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00

Last Changed Sat Apr 27 05:53:30 PM CDT 2024