Location
SLU Location
To check the ANSS location or to compare the observed P-wave first motions to the moment tensor solution, P- and S-wave first arrival times were manually read together with the P-wave first motions. The subsequent output of the program elocate is given in the file elocate.txt. The first motion plot is shown below.
Location ANSS
The ANSS event ID is usp000j7x7 and the event page is at
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000j7x7/executive.
2011/09/11 12:27:45 32.848 -100.769 5.0 4.3 Texas
Focal Mechanism
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2011/09/11 12:27:45:0 32.85 -100.77 5.0 4.3 Texas
Stations used:
EP.KIDD IU.ANMO TA.136A TA.137A TA.233A TA.234A TA.236A
TA.333A TA.334A TA.335A TA.336A TA.433A TA.434A TA.435B
TA.436A TA.534A TA.535A TA.536A TA.633A TA.634A TA.635A
TA.733A TA.ABTX TA.MSTX TA.T25A TA.TUL1 TA.U32A TA.U35A
TA.V36A TA.W35A TA.W36A TA.W37B TA.WHTX TA.X35A TA.X36A
TA.X37A TA.Y35A TA.Y36A TA.Y37A TA.Y38A TA.Z33A TA.Z36A
US.AMTX US.JCT US.MNTX US.WMOK
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.05 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.68e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.38
Z = 13 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 207 85 -160
NP2 115 70 -5
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.68e+22 11 339
N 0.00e+00 69 219
P -4.68e+22 17 73
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 3.57e+22
Mxy -2.71e+22
Mxz 3.90e+21
Myy -3.31e+22
Myz -1.58e+22
Mzz -2.62e+21
############
### T ##############--
###### ############-------
#####################---------
######################------------
######################--------------
######################----------------
---###################------------- --
----#################-------------- P --
-------##############--------------- ---
----------##########----------------------
------------#######-----------------------
---------------###------------------------
----------------##----------------------
----------------######------------------
--------------##############----------
------------########################
----------########################
-------#######################
------######################
--####################
##############
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-2.62e+21 3.90e+21 1.58e+22
3.90e+21 3.57e+22 2.71e+22
1.58e+22 2.71e+22 -3.31e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20110911122745/index.html
|
Preferred Solution
The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is
STK = 115
DIP = 70
RAKE = -5
MW = 4.38
HS = 13.0
The NDK file is 20110911122745.ndk
The waveform inversion is preferred.
Moment Tensor Comparison
The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
| SLU |
USGSMT |
GCMT |
SLUFM |
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2011/09/11 12:27:45:0 32.85 -100.77 5.0 4.3 Texas
Stations used:
EP.KIDD IU.ANMO TA.136A TA.137A TA.233A TA.234A TA.236A
TA.333A TA.334A TA.335A TA.336A TA.433A TA.434A TA.435B
TA.436A TA.534A TA.535A TA.536A TA.633A TA.634A TA.635A
TA.733A TA.ABTX TA.MSTX TA.T25A TA.TUL1 TA.U32A TA.U35A
TA.V36A TA.W35A TA.W36A TA.W37B TA.WHTX TA.X35A TA.X36A
TA.X37A TA.Y35A TA.Y36A TA.Y37A TA.Y38A TA.Z33A TA.Z36A
US.AMTX US.JCT US.MNTX US.WMOK
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.05 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 4.68e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.38
Z = 13 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 207 85 -160
NP2 115 70 -5
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 4.68e+22 11 339
N 0.00e+00 69 219
P -4.68e+22 17 73
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 3.57e+22
Mxy -2.71e+22
Mxz 3.90e+21
Myy -3.31e+22
Myz -1.58e+22
Mzz -2.62e+21
############
### T ##############--
###### ############-------
#####################---------
######################------------
######################--------------
######################----------------
---###################------------- --
----#################-------------- P --
-------##############--------------- ---
----------##########----------------------
------------#######-----------------------
---------------###------------------------
----------------##----------------------
----------------######------------------
--------------##############----------
------------########################
----------########################
-------#######################
------######################
--####################
##############
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
-2.62e+21 3.90e+21 1.58e+22
3.90e+21 3.57e+22 2.71e+22
1.58e+22 2.71e+22 -3.31e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20110911122745/index.html
|
USGS/SLU Regional Moment Solution
WESTERN TEXAS
11/09/11 12:27:45.27
Epicenter: 32.855 -100.899
MW 4.3
USGS/SLU REGIONAL MOMENT TENSOR
Depth 6 No. of sta: 17
Moment Tensor; Scale 10**15 Nm
Mrr=-0.55 Mtt= 3.29
Mpp=-2.74 Mrt=-0.71
Mrp=-0.66 Mtp= 1.78
Principal axes:
T Val= 3.94 Plg=11 Azm=164
N -0.64 75 26
P -3.30 10 256
Best Double Couple:Mo=3.7*10**15
NP1:Strike=210 Dip=89 Slip= 165
NP2: 300 75 1
|
eptember 11, 2011, WESTERN TEXAS, MW=4.5
Meredith Nettles
CENTROID-MOMENT-TENSOR SOLUTION
GCMT EVENT: S201109111227A
DATA: IU II LD G CU TA US BK
SURFACE WAVES: 80S, 107C, T= 50
TIMESTAMP: Q-20110911220257
CENTROID LOCATION:
ORIGIN TIME: 12:27:45.8 0.5
LAT:32.83N 0.03;LON:100.80W 0.02
DEP: 12.0 FIX;TRIANG HDUR: 0.4
MOMENT TENSOR: SCALE 10**22 D-CM
RR=-1.600 0.242; TT= 5.360 0.252
PP=-3.760 0.237; RT= 1.570 0.873
RP= 2.710 0.786; TP= 3.420 0.214
PRINCIPAL AXES:
1.(T) VAL= 7.156;PLG=16;AZM=339
2.(N) -1.166; 58; 223
3.(P) -5.990; 28; 77
BEST DBLE.COUPLE:M0= 6.57*10**22
NP1: STRIKE=115;DIP=59;SLIP= -9
NP2: STRIKE=210;DIP=82;SLIP=-148
#########
### T ###########--
##### ##########-----
##################---------
##################-----------
-#################-------------
-###############---------- --
----############----------- P ---
-----##########------------ ---
-------#######-------------------
---------####--------------------
-------------------------------
----------#####----------------
--------#############----####
-------####################
----###################
-##################
###########
|
First motions and takeoff angles from an elocate run.
|
Magnitudes
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula
for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
mLg Magnitude
Left: mLg computed using the IASPEI formula. Center: mLg residuals versus epicentral distance ; the values used for the trimmed mean magnitude estimate are indicated.
Right: residuals as a function of distance and azimuth.
ML Magnitude
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Context
The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.
Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the
stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.05 n 3
The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 300 85 0 4.09 0.4294
WVFGRD96 2.0 300 80 0 4.17 0.5166
WVFGRD96 3.0 120 80 5 4.20 0.5509
WVFGRD96 4.0 115 70 -10 4.24 0.5749
WVFGRD96 5.0 115 70 -10 4.27 0.5947
WVFGRD96 6.0 115 70 -10 4.29 0.6118
WVFGRD96 7.0 115 70 -10 4.31 0.6275
WVFGRD96 8.0 115 65 -10 4.34 0.6431
WVFGRD96 9.0 115 65 -5 4.35 0.6493
WVFGRD96 10.0 115 65 -5 4.36 0.6534
WVFGRD96 11.0 115 65 -5 4.37 0.6557
WVFGRD96 12.0 115 70 -5 4.38 0.6570
WVFGRD96 13.0 115 70 -5 4.38 0.6571
WVFGRD96 14.0 115 70 -5 4.39 0.6558
WVFGRD96 15.0 115 70 -5 4.40 0.6531
WVFGRD96 16.0 115 70 -5 4.41 0.6491
WVFGRD96 17.0 115 70 -5 4.41 0.6440
WVFGRD96 18.0 120 80 25 4.44 0.6388
WVFGRD96 19.0 120 80 25 4.44 0.6349
WVFGRD96 20.0 120 80 25 4.45 0.6299
WVFGRD96 21.0 120 80 25 4.46 0.6236
WVFGRD96 22.0 120 85 25 4.47 0.6169
WVFGRD96 23.0 120 85 25 4.47 0.6107
WVFGRD96 24.0 120 85 25 4.48 0.6037
WVFGRD96 25.0 120 85 25 4.48 0.5959
WVFGRD96 26.0 300 75 -5 4.48 0.5877
WVFGRD96 27.0 300 75 -5 4.48 0.5793
WVFGRD96 28.0 300 75 -5 4.49 0.5703
WVFGRD96 29.0 300 75 -5 4.50 0.5610
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 13.0 115 70 -5 4.38 0.6571
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted.
Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off.
A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3
lp c 0.05 n 3
|
|
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.
|
|
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms.
Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.
|
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
- The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
- The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
- The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the
same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion
(assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the
P arrival time)
Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Velocity Model
The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows
(The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01
CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS
1.0000 5.0000 2.8900 2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
9.0000 6.1000 3.5200 2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
10.0000 6.4000 3.7000 2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
20.0000 6.7000 3.8700 2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
0.0000 8.1500 4.7000 3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Last Changed Sat Apr 27 04:16:32 PM CDT 2024
