Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is NONE and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/NONE/executive.

2011/05/21 08:33:21 65.369 -166.891 19.0 5/2 Alaska

Focal Mechanism

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2011/05/21 08:33:21:0 65.37 -166.89 19.0 5.0 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.CHUM AK.COLD AK.GAMB AK.MLY AK.PPLA AK.TNA IU.COLA Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.06 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.41e+23 dyne-cm Mw = 4.70 Z = 9 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 120 50 -75 NP2 277 42 -107 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.41e+23 4 199 N 0.00e+00 11 290 P -1.41e+23 78 91 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.25e+23 Mxy 4.42e+22 Mxz -8.77e+21 Myy 9.34e+21 Myz -3.22e+22 Mzz -1.34e+23 ############## ###################### ############################ ############################## ################################## #######-------------------########## -###---------------------------####### ----------------------------------###### -##---------------------------------#### #####----------------------------------### ######----------------- --------------## #######---------------- P ---------------# #########-------------- ---------------- #########------------------------------- ############---------------------------- #############------------------------- ################-------------------- ####################-----------### ############################## ############################ ### ################ T ############ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.34e+23 -8.77e+21 3.22e+22 -8.77e+21 1.25e+23 -4.42e+22 3.22e+22 -4.42e+22 9.34e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20110521083321/index.html

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is

      STK = 120
      DIP = 50
     RAKE = -75
       MW = 4.70
       HS = 9.0

The NDK file is 20110521083321.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and M_L by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for M_L is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined M_L. The defined M_L uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

Context

The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.

Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.06 n 3

The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    0.5   335    75   -20   4.29 0.3991
WVFGRD96    1.0   335    75   -15   4.31 0.4113
WVFGRD96    2.0   330    65   -30   4.47 0.4417
WVFGRD96    3.0   145    60   -40   4.52 0.4531
WVFGRD96    4.0   140    60   -50   4.55 0.5235
WVFGRD96    5.0   140    60   -50   4.55 0.5919
WVFGRD96    6.0   135    55   -55   4.57 0.6463
WVFGRD96    7.0   125    50   -65   4.60 0.6835
WVFGRD96    8.0   125    50   -70   4.69 0.7181
WVFGRD96    9.0   120    50   -75   4.70 0.7427
WVFGRD96   10.0   120    50   -75   4.69 0.7420
WVFGRD96   11.0   115    50   -80   4.70 0.7308
WVFGRD96   12.0   115    50   -80   4.69 0.7120
WVFGRD96   13.0   110    50   -85   4.70 0.6876
WVFGRD96   14.0   285    40   -95   4.70 0.6662
WVFGRD96   15.0   285    40   -95   4.69 0.6435
WVFGRD96   16.0    90    75    80   4.72 0.6391
WVFGRD96   17.0    90    70    75   4.73 0.6386
WVFGRD96   18.0    90    70    75   4.73 0.6371
WVFGRD96   19.0    90    75    75   4.75 0.6351
WVFGRD96   20.0    90    75    75   4.75 0.6325
WVFGRD96   21.0    90    70    70   4.77 0.6310
WVFGRD96   22.0    90    70    70   4.78 0.6283
WVFGRD96   23.0    90    70    70   4.79 0.6245
WVFGRD96   24.0    90    70    70   4.80 0.6195
WVFGRD96   25.0    90    70    70   4.80 0.6131
WVFGRD96   26.0    90    70    65   4.82 0.6061
WVFGRD96   27.0    90    70    65   4.83 0.6022
WVFGRD96   28.0    90    70    65   4.84 0.5960
WVFGRD96   29.0    90    70    65   4.84 0.5870

The best solution is

WVFGRD96    9.0   120    50   -75   4.70 0.7427

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is

Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.06 n 3

Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion (assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the P arrival time)

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00

Last Changed Sat Apr 27 01:58:46 PM CDT 2024