Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is nm607654 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nm607654/executive.

2010/10/16 09:43:19 35.288 -92.333 6.0 3.5 Arkansas

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2010/10/16 09:43:19:0  35.29  -92.33   6.0 3.5 Arkansas
 
 Stations used:
   AG.HHAR AG.LCAR AG.WLAR IU.CCM NM.MGMO NM.SIUC NM.UALR 
   TA.Q36A TA.S36A TA.T36A TA.T37A TA.W37A TA.Y37A TA.Y39A 
   TA.Z38A US.MIAR 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   hp c 0.03 n 3
   lp c 0.10 n 3
   br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.02e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.47 
  Z  = 10 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      305    80    25
   NP2      210    65   169
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.02e+21     25     170
    N   0.00e+00     63     325
    P  -2.02e+21     10      76

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     1.50e+21
       Mxy    -7.53e+20
       Mxz    -8.39e+20
       Myy    -1.79e+21
       Myz    -2.00e+20
       Mzz     2.92e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##############                  
                 #####################-              
              ####################--------           
             ##################------------          
           ##################----------------        
          ------############------------------       
         ----------#######---------------------      
        ---------------##--------------------        
        ---------------###------------------- P      
       ---------------######-----------------   -    
       --------------##########------------------    
       -------------##############---------------    
       -------------################-------------    
        -----------###################----------     
        ----------######################--------     
         ---------########################-----      
          --------##########################--       
           ------############################        
             ----############   ###########          
              ---############ T ##########           
                 ############   #######              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  2.92e+20  -8.39e+20   2.00e+20 
 -8.39e+20   1.50e+21   7.53e+20 
  2.00e+20   7.53e+20  -1.79e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20101016094319/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is

      STK = 305
      DIP = 80
     RAKE = 25
       MW = 3.47
       HS = 10.0

The NDK file is 20101016094319.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

ML Magnitude


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Context

The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    0.5   125    65    15   3.36 0.5974
WVFGRD96    1.0   125    75    15   3.35 0.6177
WVFGRD96    2.0   120    75   -10   3.36 0.6453
WVFGRD96    3.0   300    70   -15   3.39 0.6563
WVFGRD96    4.0   300    70   -15   3.40 0.6558
WVFGRD96    5.0   310    60    25   3.44 0.6593
WVFGRD96    6.0   310    65    25   3.43 0.6655
WVFGRD96    7.0   305    80    25   3.43 0.6706
WVFGRD96    8.0   305    80    25   3.44 0.6733
WVFGRD96    9.0   305    80    25   3.45 0.6751
WVFGRD96   10.0   305    80    25   3.47 0.6758
WVFGRD96   11.0   305    80    25   3.48 0.6751
WVFGRD96   12.0   305    80    25   3.49 0.6728
WVFGRD96   13.0   305    75    20   3.50 0.6688
WVFGRD96   14.0   305    75    20   3.51 0.6630
WVFGRD96   15.0   305    70    15   3.52 0.6555
WVFGRD96   16.0   305    70    15   3.53 0.6470
WVFGRD96   17.0   120    90   -20   3.54 0.6301
WVFGRD96   18.0   305    70    15   3.54 0.6228
WVFGRD96   19.0   305    60    10   3.56 0.6089
WVFGRD96   20.0   305    55    10   3.58 0.5948
WVFGRD96   21.0   305    50    10   3.60 0.5813
WVFGRD96   22.0   310    45    20   3.62 0.5679
WVFGRD96   23.0   315    35    30   3.67 0.5553
WVFGRD96   24.0   315    35    30   3.68 0.5457
WVFGRD96   25.0   315    30    30   3.71 0.5374
WVFGRD96   26.0   320    25    35   3.74 0.5316
WVFGRD96   27.0   320    25    35   3.75 0.5255
WVFGRD96   28.0   315    25    30   3.76 0.5193
WVFGRD96   29.0   320    20    35   3.79 0.5140

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   10.0   305    80    25   3.47 0.6758

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Velocity Model

The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).

MODEL.01
CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
  H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)   QP   QS  ETAP  ETAS  FREFP  FREFS
  1.0000  5.0000  2.8900  2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
  9.0000  6.1000  3.5200  2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
 10.0000  6.4000  3.7000  2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
 20.0000  6.7000  3.8700  2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
  0.0000  8.1500  4.7000  3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
Last Changed Sat Apr 27 02:30:00 PM CDT 2024