The ANSS event ID is ak010bebh8wh and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ak010bebh8wh/executive.
2010/09/05 10:41:26 63.347 -145.094 3.7 4.2 Alaska
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2010/09/05 10:41:26:0 63.35 -145.09 3.7 4.2 Alaska
Stations used:
AK.BAL AK.BMR AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.CHUM AK.COLD
AK.CRQ AK.CTG AK.DHY AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.FID AK.FYU AK.HARP
AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.MCK AK.MLY AK.PAX AK.PIN AK.PPLA AK.RAG
AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SKN AK.SSN AK.SWD AK.TGL
AK.TRF AK.WRH AT.PMR IM.IL31 IU.COLA US.EGAK XF.BOOM
XF.DOST XF.GOAT XF.GRAP XF.KAVU XF.LUPN XZ.BAGL XZ.BARK
XZ.BARN XZ.GRNC XZ.ISLE XZ.KIAG XZ.LOGN XZ.MCAR XZ.MESA
XZ.PTPK XZ.SUCK XZ.TABL XZ.VRDI YO.TIDE
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3
lp c 0.10 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.72e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.09
Z = 13 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 132 51 124
NP2 265 50 55
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.72e+22 64 108
N 0.00e+00 26 289
P -1.72e+22 1 199
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx -1.51e+22
Mxy -6.23e+21
Mxz -1.88e+21
Myy 1.21e+21
Myz 6.52e+21
Mzz 1.39e+22
--------------
----------------------
----------------------------
------------------------------
#---------------------------------
##----------------------------------
####------#####################-------
#####--#############################----
######################################--
####---##################################-
##------##################################
#--------################# #############
----------################ T #############
-----------############## ############
-------------###########################
--------------########################
---------------#####################
-----------------#################
--------------------##########
----------------------------
--- ----------------
P ------------
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
1.39e+22 -1.88e+21 -6.52e+21
-1.88e+21 -1.51e+22 6.23e+21
-6.52e+21 6.23e+21 1.21e+21
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20100905104126/index.html
|
STK = 265
DIP = 50
RAKE = 55
MW = 4.09
HS = 13.0
The NDK file is 20100905104126.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
 |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 10 40 -90 3.94 0.4404
WVFGRD96 2.0 215 60 -75 4.01 0.4104
WVFGRD96 3.0 235 55 -55 4.00 0.4029
WVFGRD96 4.0 240 60 -50 3.98 0.4083
WVFGRD96 5.0 240 75 60 3.96 0.4417
WVFGRD96 6.0 250 65 60 3.98 0.4902
WVFGRD96 7.0 255 55 60 4.01 0.5419
WVFGRD96 8.0 255 55 55 4.02 0.5855
WVFGRD96 9.0 270 50 60 4.04 0.6174
WVFGRD96 10.0 270 50 60 4.07 0.6317
WVFGRD96 11.0 270 50 60 4.08 0.6506
WVFGRD96 12.0 270 50 60 4.08 0.6603
WVFGRD96 13.0 265 50 55 4.09 0.6633
WVFGRD96 14.0 265 50 55 4.09 0.6609
WVFGRD96 15.0 260 55 50 4.10 0.6533
WVFGRD96 16.0 260 55 50 4.11 0.6430
WVFGRD96 17.0 260 55 50 4.11 0.6306
WVFGRD96 18.0 260 55 50 4.12 0.6151
WVFGRD96 19.0 255 55 50 4.13 0.6012
WVFGRD96 20.0 250 55 50 4.15 0.5842
WVFGRD96 21.0 250 55 50 4.16 0.5705
WVFGRD96 22.0 245 55 50 4.17 0.5551
WVFGRD96 23.0 245 55 45 4.17 0.5387
WVFGRD96 24.0 245 55 45 4.17 0.5224
WVFGRD96 25.0 245 55 45 4.18 0.5039
WVFGRD96 26.0 245 55 45 4.18 0.4845
WVFGRD96 27.0 245 50 45 4.18 0.4654
WVFGRD96 28.0 245 50 45 4.19 0.4463
WVFGRD96 29.0 240 55 40 4.19 0.4273
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 13.0 265 50 55 4.09 0.6633
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.0000 5.0000 2.8900 2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 9.0000 6.1000 3.5200 2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.0000 6.4000 3.7000 2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 20.0000 6.7000 3.8700 2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 8.1500 4.7000 3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00