The ANSS event ID is uu50407595 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/uu50407595/executive.
2010/04/15 23:59:38 41.713 -111.094 10.2 4.89 Utah
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2010/04/15 23:59:38:0 41.71 -111.09 10.2 4.9 Utah Stations used: IW.IMW IW.LOHW IW.MFID IW.REDW IW.TPAW LB.MVU TA.H19A TA.I19A TA.I20A TA.I21A TA.J19A TA.K21A TA.K22A TA.K23A TA.L23A TA.N22A TA.O20A TA.P22A US.AHID US.BOZ US.BW06 US.DUG US.ELK US.HLID US.HWUT US.ISCO UU.BGU UU.HVU UU.JLU UU.MTPU UU.NLU UU.PSUT UU.RDMU UU.TCRU UU.TCU XV.BB1 XV.BH2C XV.BH2E XV.BH3D XV.BH3E XV.BH4A XV.BH4D Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.05 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 7.33e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.51 Z = 5 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 339 64 -114 NP2 205 35 -50 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 7.33e+22 16 87 N 0.00e+00 22 350 P -7.33e+22 63 210 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.13e+22 Mxy -2.84e+21 Mxz 2.69e+22 Myy 6.40e+22 Myz 3.37e+22 Mzz -5.28e+22 -------------- #######----########### ##########--################ #########------############### #########---------################ ########------------################ ########--------------################ ########----------------################ #######------------------############### ########-------------------########## ## #######---------------------######### T ## #######---------------------######### ## ######-----------------------############# #####---------- ----------############ ######--------- P -----------########### #####--------- -----------########## ####-----------------------######### ####----------------------######## ###---------------------###### ###-------------------###### #------------------### -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -5.28e+22 2.69e+22 -3.37e+22 2.69e+22 -1.13e+22 2.84e+21 -3.37e+22 2.84e+21 6.40e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20100415235938/index.html |
STK = 205 DIP = 35 RAKE = -50 MW = 4.51 HS = 5.0
The NDK file is 20100415235938.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.
![]() |
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
![]() |
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.05 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 35 65 -40 4.29 0.4162 WVFGRD96 2.0 215 45 -35 4.42 0.4954 WVFGRD96 3.0 210 35 -40 4.49 0.5532 WVFGRD96 4.0 210 35 -40 4.50 0.5822 WVFGRD96 5.0 205 35 -50 4.51 0.5853 WVFGRD96 6.0 205 35 -50 4.51 0.5736 WVFGRD96 7.0 210 40 -45 4.50 0.5541 WVFGRD96 8.0 205 35 -50 4.55 0.5601 WVFGRD96 9.0 205 35 -50 4.54 0.5312 WVFGRD96 10.0 220 45 -20 4.49 0.5076 WVFGRD96 11.0 225 50 -5 4.48 0.4909 WVFGRD96 12.0 230 55 10 4.49 0.4835 WVFGRD96 13.0 235 55 20 4.50 0.4769 WVFGRD96 14.0 235 55 20 4.50 0.4705 WVFGRD96 15.0 235 55 20 4.50 0.4637 WVFGRD96 16.0 235 60 20 4.51 0.4566 WVFGRD96 17.0 230 65 10 4.51 0.4509 WVFGRD96 18.0 230 65 10 4.51 0.4484 WVFGRD96 19.0 230 65 10 4.52 0.4459 WVFGRD96 20.0 230 65 10 4.52 0.4430 WVFGRD96 21.0 230 65 5 4.53 0.4397 WVFGRD96 22.0 230 65 5 4.54 0.4368 WVFGRD96 23.0 230 65 5 4.54 0.4336 WVFGRD96 24.0 230 65 5 4.55 0.4302 WVFGRD96 25.0 230 65 5 4.55 0.4262 WVFGRD96 26.0 230 65 5 4.56 0.4222 WVFGRD96 27.0 230 65 5 4.57 0.4182 WVFGRD96 28.0 230 65 5 4.57 0.4137 WVFGRD96 29.0 230 65 5 4.58 0.4093
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 5.0 205 35 -50 4.51 0.5853
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
![]() |
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
![]() |
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.05 n 3
![]() |
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
![]() |
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00