Location

Location ANSS

The ANSS event ID is uw10714268 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/uw10714268/executive.

2007/06/14 21:57:56 45.126 -120.944 17.7 3.8 Oregon

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2007/06/14 21:57:56:0  45.13 -120.94  17.7 3.8 Oregon
 
 Stations used:
   TA.E05A TA.E06A TA.E07A TA.F04A TA.F05A TA.F06A TA.F07A 
   TA.F08A TA.G04A TA.G05A TA.G06A TA.G07A TA.H03A TA.H04A 
   TA.H05A TA.H06A TA.H08A TA.I04A TA.I05A TA.I06A TA.I07A 
   US.HAWA 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
   br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.85e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.57 
  Z  = 16 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      255    85    20
   NP2      163    70   175
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.85e+21     18     121
    N   0.00e+00     69     268
    P  -2.85e+21     10      27

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -1.49e+21
       Mxy    -2.27e+21
       Mxz    -8.67e+20
       Myy     1.32e+21
       Myz     4.74e+20
       Mzz     1.69e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     #-------------                  
                 ####-------------- P -              
              #######--------------   ----           
             ########----------------------          
           ##########------------------------        
          ###########-------------------------       
         ############--------------------------      
        #############---------------------------     
        ##############---------------------#####     
       ###############------------###############    
       ###############-----######################    
       #############---##########################    
       #######----------#########################    
        ##--------------########################     
        -----------------#################   ###     
         -----------------################ T ##      
          -----------------###############   #       
           -----------------#################        
             ----------------##############          
              ----------------############           
                 ---------------#######              
                     ------------##                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  1.69e+20  -8.67e+20  -4.74e+20 
 -8.67e+20  -1.49e+21   2.27e+21 
 -4.74e+20   2.27e+21   1.32e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20070614215756/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion or first motion observations is

      STK = 255
      DIP = 85
     RAKE = 20
       MW = 3.57
       HS = 16.0

The NDK file is 20070614215756.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to those provided by others. The purpose is to look for major differences and also to note slight differences that might be inherent to the processing procedure. For completeness the USGS/SLU solution is repeated from above.
SLU
UW
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2007/06/14 21:57:56:0  45.13 -120.94  17.7 3.8 Oregon
 
 Stations used:
   TA.E05A TA.E06A TA.E07A TA.F04A TA.F05A TA.F06A TA.F07A 
   TA.F08A TA.G04A TA.G05A TA.G06A TA.G07A TA.H03A TA.H04A 
   TA.H05A TA.H06A TA.H08A TA.I04A TA.I05A TA.I06A TA.I07A 
   US.HAWA 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
   br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.85e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.57 
  Z  = 16 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      255    85    20
   NP2      163    70   175
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.85e+21     18     121
    N   0.00e+00     69     268
    P  -2.85e+21     10      27

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx    -1.49e+21
       Mxy    -2.27e+21
       Mxz    -8.67e+20
       Myy     1.32e+21
       Myz     4.74e+20
       Mzz     1.69e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     #-------------                  
                 ####-------------- P -              
              #######--------------   ----           
             ########----------------------          
           ##########------------------------        
          ###########-------------------------       
         ############--------------------------      
        #############---------------------------     
        ##############---------------------#####     
       ###############------------###############    
       ###############-----######################    
       #############---##########################    
       #######----------#########################    
        ##--------------########################     
        -----------------#################   ###     
         -----------------################ T ##      
          -----------------###############   #       
           -----------------#################        
             ----------------##############          
              ----------------############           
                 ---------------#######              
                     ------------##                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  1.69e+20  -8.67e+20  -4.74e+20 
 -8.67e+20  -1.49e+21   2.27e+21 
 -4.74e+20   2.27e+21   1.32e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20070614215756/index.html
	
University of Washington First Motion Solution

        
University of Washington Automated moment Tensor


        

Magnitudes

Given the availability of digital waveforms for determination of the moment tensor, this section documents the added processing leading to mLg, if appropriate to the region, and ML by application of the respective IASPEI formulae. As a research study, the linear distance term of the IASPEI formula for ML is adjusted to remove a linear distance trend in residuals to give a regionally defined ML. The defined ML uses horizontal component recordings, but the same procedure is applied to the vertical components since there may be some interest in vertical component ground motions. Residual plots versus distance may indicate interesting features of ground motion scaling in some distance ranges. A residual plot of the regionalized magnitude is given as a function of distance and azimuth, since data sets may transcend different wave propagation provinces.

ML Magnitude


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components. Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.


Left: ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research). Center: ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot. Right: Residuals from new relation as a function of distance and azimuth.

Context

The left panel of the next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other nearby events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors). Thus context plot is useful for assessing the appropriateness of the moment tensor of this event.

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   255    85     0   3.03 0.2639
WVFGRD96    2.0   255    85     0   3.23 0.4559
WVFGRD96    3.0   255    85    15   3.30 0.5279
WVFGRD96    4.0   255    85    25   3.35 0.5753
WVFGRD96    5.0    75    85   -35   3.41 0.6312
WVFGRD96    6.0    75    85   -35   3.43 0.6773
WVFGRD96    7.0    75    90   -30   3.44 0.7093
WVFGRD96    8.0    75    90   -35   3.49 0.7323
WVFGRD96    9.0    75    90   -35   3.50 0.7502
WVFGRD96   10.0    75    90   -30   3.51 0.7652
WVFGRD96   11.0   255    90    25   3.52 0.7751
WVFGRD96   12.0   255    90    25   3.53 0.7836
WVFGRD96   13.0    75    90   -25   3.54 0.7883
WVFGRD96   14.0    75    90   -20   3.55 0.7909
WVFGRD96   15.0   255    85    20   3.56 0.7928
WVFGRD96   16.0   255    85    20   3.57 0.7936
WVFGRD96   17.0    75    90   -20   3.59 0.7914
WVFGRD96   18.0    75    90   -20   3.60 0.7892
WVFGRD96   19.0    75    90   -20   3.61 0.7855
WVFGRD96   20.0   255    85    20   3.62 0.7824
WVFGRD96   21.0   255    85    20   3.63 0.7764
WVFGRD96   22.0    75    90   -20   3.64 0.7657
WVFGRD96   23.0   255    85    20   3.65 0.7601
WVFGRD96   24.0    75    90   -20   3.66 0.7455
WVFGRD96   25.0   255    85    20   3.66 0.7370
WVFGRD96   26.0    75    90   -20   3.67 0.7186
WVFGRD96   27.0   255    85    20   3.68 0.7077
WVFGRD96   28.0   255    85    20   3.68 0.6909
WVFGRD96   29.0   255    85    20   3.69 0.6728

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   16.0   255    85    20   3.57 0.7936

The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Surface-Wave Focal Mechanism

The following figure shows the stations used in the grid search for the best focal mechanism to fit the surface-wave spectral amplitudes of the Love and Rayleigh waves.
Location of broadband stations used to obtain focal mechanism from surface-wave spectral amplitudes

The surface-wave determined focal mechanism is shown here.


  NODAL PLANES 

  
  STK=      72.38
  DIP=      80.34
 RAKE=     -15.22
  
             OR
  
  STK=     164.99
  DIP=      75.00
 RAKE=    -169.99
 
 
DEPTH = 18.0 km
 
Mw = 3.63
Best Fit 0.9043 - P-T axis plot gives solutions with FIT greater than FIT90

Surface-wave analysis

Surface wave analysis was performed using codes from Computer Programs in Seismology, specifically the multiple filter analysis program do_mft and the surface-wave radiation pattern search program srfgrd96.

Data preparation

Digital data were collected, instrument response removed and traces converted to Z, R an T components. Multiple filter analysis was applied to the Z and T traces to obtain the Rayleigh- and Love-wave spectral amplitudes, respectively. These were input to the search program which examined all depths between 1 and 25 km and all possible mechanisms.
Best mechanism fit as a function of depth. The preferred depth is given above. Lower hemisphere projection

Pressure-tension axis trends. Since the surface-wave spectra search does not distinguish between P and T axes and since there is a 180 ambiguity in strike, all possible P and T axes are plotted. First motion data and waveforms will be used to select the preferred mechanism. The purpose of this plot is to provide an idea of the possible range of solutions. The P and T-axes for all mechanisms with goodness of fit greater than 0.9 FITMAX (above) are plotted here.


Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the Love and Rayleigh wave radiation patterns. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. Because of the symmetry of the spectral amplitude rediation patterns, only strikes from 0-180 degrees are sampled.

Love-wave radiation patterns

Rayleigh-wave radiation patterns