The ANSS event ID is nm605688 and the event page is at https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nm605688/executive.
2005/02/10 14:04:53 35.759 -90.250 15.5 4.1 Arkansas
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
ENS 2005/02/10 14:04:53:0 35.76 -90.25 15.5 4.1 Arkansas
Stations used:
NM.FVM NM.MPH NM.PVMO NM.SIUC NM.SLM NM.UALR NM.USIN US.CCM
US.LRAL US.OXF US.WCI
Filtering commands used:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +30
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.04 n 3
lp c 0.15 n 3
Best Fitting Double Couple
Mo = 1.50e+22 dyne-cm
Mw = 4.05
Z = 17 km
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 48 80 170
NP2 140 80 10
Principal Axes:
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 1.50e+22 14 4
N 0.00e+00 76 185
P -1.50e+22 0 94
Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
Component Value
Mxx 1.39e+22
Mxy 2.08e+21
Mxz 3.53e+21
Myy -1.48e+22
Myz 2.26e+20
Mzz 8.89e+20
####### ####
########### T ########
-############# ###########
---###########################
-----##########################---
-------########################-----
----------#####################-------
------------##################----------
-------------###############------------
----------------############--------------
-----------------#########--------------
------------------######---------------- P
--------------------##------------------
------------------###-------------------
----------------######------------------
-------------##########---------------
---------###############------------
-----####################---------
#########################-----
###########################-
######################
##############
Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
R T P
8.89e+20 3.53e+21 -2.26e+20
3.53e+21 1.39e+22 -2.08e+21
-2.26e+20 -2.08e+21 -1.48e+22
Details of the solution is found at
http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20050210140453/index.html
|
STK = 140
DIP = 80
RAKE = 10
MW = 4.05
HS = 17.0
The NDK file is 20050210140453.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
|
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event (star) and the stations used for (red) the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
|
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green's functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +30 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.04 n 3 lp c 0.15 n 3The results of this grid search are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT
WVFGRD96 1.0 140 75 20 3.81 0.4324
WVFGRD96 2.0 140 80 5 3.83 0.4588
WVFGRD96 3.0 140 80 5 3.85 0.4736
WVFGRD96 4.0 140 80 5 3.87 0.4838
WVFGRD96 5.0 140 80 5 3.89 0.4934
WVFGRD96 6.0 140 80 5 3.90 0.5020
WVFGRD96 7.0 140 80 5 3.92 0.5108
WVFGRD96 8.0 140 80 5 3.93 0.5192
WVFGRD96 9.0 140 80 5 3.95 0.5264
WVFGRD96 10.0 140 80 10 3.97 0.5370
WVFGRD96 11.0 140 80 10 3.98 0.5453
WVFGRD96 12.0 140 80 10 4.00 0.5522
WVFGRD96 13.0 140 80 10 4.01 0.5574
WVFGRD96 14.0 140 80 10 4.02 0.5616
WVFGRD96 15.0 140 80 10 4.03 0.5642
WVFGRD96 16.0 140 80 10 4.04 0.5650
WVFGRD96 17.0 140 80 10 4.05 0.5651
WVFGRD96 18.0 140 80 10 4.06 0.5639
WVFGRD96 19.0 140 80 15 4.08 0.5624
WVFGRD96 20.0 145 75 20 4.09 0.5627
WVFGRD96 21.0 320 75 5 4.10 0.5594
WVFGRD96 22.0 320 75 5 4.11 0.5598
WVFGRD96 23.0 320 80 5 4.11 0.5596
WVFGRD96 24.0 320 80 5 4.12 0.5587
WVFGRD96 25.0 320 80 5 4.12 0.5559
WVFGRD96 26.0 320 75 10 4.13 0.5517
WVFGRD96 27.0 320 75 10 4.13 0.5458
WVFGRD96 28.0 145 75 15 4.13 0.5425
WVFGRD96 29.0 145 75 15 4.13 0.5435
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 17.0 140 80 10 4.05 0.5651
The mechanism corresponding to the best fit is
|
|
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
|
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed, the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect and the epicentral parameters may be be off. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +30 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.04 n 3 lp c 0.15 n 3
|
| Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated. The time scale is relative to the first trace sample. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the waveforms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
The following figure shows the stations used in the grid search for the best focal mechanism to fit the surface-wave spectral amplitudes of the Love and Rayleigh waves.
|
|
|
The surface-wave determined focal mechanism is shown here.
NODAL PLANES
STK= 54.99
DIP= 80.00
RAKE= -165.00
OR
STK= 322.32
DIP= 75.23
RAKE= -10.35
DEPTH = 15.0 km
Mw = 4.11
Best Fit 0.6359 - P-T axis plot gives solutions with FIT greater than FIT90
 |
Surface wave analysis was performed using codes from Computer Programs in Seismology, specifically the multiple filter analysis program do_mft and the surface-wave radiation pattern search program srfgrd96.
Digital data were collected, instrument response removed and traces converted
to Z, R an T components. Multiple filter analysis was applied to the Z and T traces to obtain the Rayleigh- and Love-wave spectral amplitudes, respectively.
These were input to the search program which examined all depths between 1 and 25 km
and all possible mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
| Pressure-tension axis trends. Since the surface-wave spectra search does not distinguish between P and T axes and since there is a 180 ambiguity in strike, all possible P and T axes are plotted. First motion data and waveforms will be used to select the preferred mechanism. The purpose of this plot is to provide an idea of the possible range of solutions. The P and T-axes for all mechanisms with goodness of fit greater than 0.9 FITMAX (above) are plotted here. |
|
| Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to the Love and Rayleigh wave radiation patterns. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. Because of the symmetry of the spectral amplitude rediation patterns, only strikes from 0-180 degrees are sampled. |
|
|
The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows (The format is in the model96 format of Computer Programs in Seismology).
MODEL.01 CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.0000 5.0000 2.8900 2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 9.0000 6.1000 3.5200 2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 10.0000 6.4000 3.7000 2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 20.0000 6.7000 3.8700 2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 8.1500 4.7000 3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
