Location

Location ANSS

2022/06/29 23:03:01 34.165 -80.728 3.0 3.6 S. Carolina

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2022/06/29 23:03:01:0  34.17  -80.73   3.0 3.6 S. Carolina
 
 Stations used:
   CO.BIRD CO.CASEE CO.CSB CO.TEEBA ET.CPCT IM.TKL N4.152A 
   N4.154A N4.257A N4.456A N4.KMSC N4.S54A N4.S57A N4.T57A 
   N4.T59A N4.TIGA N4.U54A N4.U56A N4.V53A N4.V55A N4.V58A 
   N4.V61A N4.W50A N4.W52A N4.W57A N4.W59A N4.X51A N4.Y52A 
   N4.Y58A N4.Y60A US.GOGA US.NHSC US.TZTN 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.08 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.48e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.53 
  Z  = 2 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      201    81   155
   NP2      295    65    10
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.48e+21     24     155
    N   0.00e+00     63       2
    P  -2.48e+21     11     250

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     1.43e+21
       Mxy    -1.55e+21
       Mxz    -6.88e+20
       Myy    -1.76e+21
       Myz     8.20e+20
       Mzz     3.30e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##############                  
                 #################-----              
              ###################---------           
             ###################-----------          
           ####################--------------        
          ####################----------------       
         ---------------#####------------------      
        --------------------#-------------------     
        -------------------######---------------     
       --------------------#########-------------    
       -------------------#############----------    
       ------------------################--------    
       ------------------##################------    
        -   ------------####################----     
        - P -----------#######################--     
            -----------########################      
          ------------########################       
           -----------###########   #########        
             --------############ T #######          
              -------############   ######           
                 ----##################              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  3.30e+20  -6.88e+20  -8.20e+20 
 -6.88e+20   1.43e+21   1.55e+21 
 -8.20e+20   1.55e+21  -1.76e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20220629230301/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 295
      DIP = 65
     RAKE = 10
       MW = 3.53
       HS = 2.0

The NDK file is 20220629230301.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU
USGSMWR
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2022/06/29 23:03:01:0  34.17  -80.73   3.0 3.6 S. Carolina
 
 Stations used:
   CO.BIRD CO.CASEE CO.CSB CO.TEEBA ET.CPCT IM.TKL N4.152A 
   N4.154A N4.257A N4.456A N4.KMSC N4.S54A N4.S57A N4.T57A 
   N4.T59A N4.TIGA N4.U54A N4.U56A N4.V53A N4.V55A N4.V58A 
   N4.V61A N4.W50A N4.W52A N4.W57A N4.W59A N4.X51A N4.Y52A 
   N4.Y58A N4.Y60A US.GOGA US.NHSC US.TZTN 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.08 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.48e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.53 
  Z  = 2 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      201    81   155
   NP2      295    65    10
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.48e+21     24     155
    N   0.00e+00     63       2
    P  -2.48e+21     11     250

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     1.43e+21
       Mxy    -1.55e+21
       Mxz    -6.88e+20
       Myy    -1.76e+21
       Myz     8.20e+20
       Mzz     3.30e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##############                  
                 #################-----              
              ###################---------           
             ###################-----------          
           ####################--------------        
          ####################----------------       
         ---------------#####------------------      
        --------------------#-------------------     
        -------------------######---------------     
       --------------------#########-------------    
       -------------------#############----------    
       ------------------################--------    
       ------------------##################------    
        -   ------------####################----     
        - P -----------#######################--     
            -----------########################      
          ------------########################       
           -----------###########   #########        
             --------############ T #######          
              -------############   ######           
                 ----##################              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  3.30e+20  -6.88e+20  -8.20e+20 
 -6.88e+20   1.43e+21   1.55e+21 
 -8.20e+20   1.55e+21  -1.76e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20220629230301/index.html
	
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr)
Moment 3.185e+14 N-m
Magnitude 3.60 Mwr
Depth 2.0 km
Percent DC 91%
Half Duration -
Catalog US
Data Source US 3
Contributor US 3

Nodal Planes
Plane Strike Dip Rake
NP1 20 50 167
NP2 118 80 41

Principal Axes
Axis Value Plunge Azimuth
T 3.105e+14 N-m 35 347
N 0.154e+14 N-m 48 129
P -3.259e+14 N-m 20 243

        

Magnitudes

mLg Magnitude


(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.

ML Magnitude


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.08 n 3 
The results of this grid search are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   295    55    10   3.53 0.6523
WVFGRD96    2.0   295    65    10   3.53 0.6618
WVFGRD96    3.0   295    65    10   3.54 0.6522
WVFGRD96    4.0   295    70    15   3.55 0.6381
WVFGRD96    5.0   295    75    25   3.56 0.6267
WVFGRD96    6.0   120    70    30   3.57 0.6220
WVFGRD96    7.0   115    75    30   3.57 0.6226
WVFGRD96    8.0   115    75    30   3.58 0.6218
WVFGRD96    9.0   115    75    25   3.58 0.6206
WVFGRD96   10.0   115    75    30   3.60 0.6185
WVFGRD96   11.0   115    75    30   3.61 0.6150
WVFGRD96   12.0   115    75    25   3.61 0.6107
WVFGRD96   13.0   115    75    25   3.62 0.6059
WVFGRD96   14.0   115    75    25   3.62 0.6002
WVFGRD96   15.0   115    75    25   3.63 0.5938
WVFGRD96   16.0   115    75    25   3.64 0.5873
WVFGRD96   17.0   290    80   -25   3.64 0.5809
WVFGRD96   18.0   290    80   -25   3.65 0.5773
WVFGRD96   19.0   290    80   -20   3.66 0.5728
WVFGRD96   20.0   115    70   -15   3.68 0.5714
WVFGRD96   21.0   115    70   -15   3.68 0.5678
WVFGRD96   22.0   115    70   -15   3.69 0.5633
WVFGRD96   23.0   115    70   -15   3.70 0.5593
WVFGRD96   24.0   110    70   -15   3.70 0.5554
WVFGRD96   25.0   115    75   -15   3.71 0.5501
WVFGRD96   26.0   115    75   -15   3.71 0.5442
WVFGRD96   27.0   115    75   -15   3.72 0.5390
WVFGRD96   28.0   115    75   -15   3.73 0.5327
WVFGRD96   29.0   115    75   -15   3.73 0.5254

The best solution is

WVFGRD96    2.0   295    65    10   3.53 0.6618

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +40
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.08 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureau of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Oklahoma Geological Survey, TexNet, the Iris stations, the Transportable Array of EarthScope and other networks.

Velocity Model

The CUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
CUS Model with Q from simple gamma values
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
  H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)   QP   QS  ETAP  ETAS  FREFP  FREFS
  1.0000  5.0000  2.8900  2.5000 0.172E-02 0.387E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
  9.0000  6.1000  3.5200  2.7300 0.160E-02 0.363E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
 10.0000  6.4000  3.7000  2.8200 0.149E-02 0.336E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
 20.0000  6.7000  3.8700  2.9020 0.000E-04 0.000E-04 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 
  0.0000  8.1500  4.7000  3.3640 0.194E-02 0.431E-02 0.00  0.00  1.00  1.00 

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Thu Jun 30 06:16:39 CDT 2022