Location

Location ANSS

2021/04/08 17:10:18 63.208 -148.582 77.7 5.7 Alaska

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2021/04/08 17:10:18:0  63.21 -148.58  77.7 5.7 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BARN AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.CRQ AK.CUT AK.GLB AK.HIN AK.I23K 
   AK.J19K AK.K24K AK.M26K AK.M27K AK.MCK AK.PAX AK.POKR 
   AK.PPD AK.PPLA AK.RAG AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SSN AK.TRF AK.WRH 
   AT.PMR AV.RED AV.SPCP IU.COLA TA.M22K 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.02 n 3 
   lp c 0.05 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.48e+24 dyne-cm
  Mw = 5.53 
  Z  = 80 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      280    65   -70
   NP2       59    32   -126
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.48e+24     18     355
    N   0.00e+00     18      91
    P  -2.48e+24     64     224

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     2.00e+24
       Mxy    -4.18e+23
       Mxz     1.41e+24
       Myy    -2.09e+23
       Myz     6.14e+23
       Mzz    -1.79e+24
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ####   #######                  
                 ######## T ###########              
              ###########   ##############           
             ##############################          
           ##################################        
          ####################################       
         #####################################-      
        #######-------------##################--     
        #---------------------------##########--     
       ---------------------------------######---    
       ------------------------------------###---    
       --------------------------------------#---    
       ---------------   -------------------####-    
        -------------- P ------------------#####     
        --------------   -----------------######     
         -------------------------------#######      
          ----------------------------########       
           #------------------------#########        
             ##-----------------###########          
              ############################           
                 ######################              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
 -1.79e+24   1.41e+24  -6.14e+23 
  1.41e+24   2.00e+24   4.18e+23 
 -6.14e+23   4.18e+23  -2.09e+23 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20210408171018/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 280
      DIP = 65
     RAKE = -70
       MW = 5.53
       HS = 80.0

The NDK file is 20210408171018.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2021/04/08 17:10:18:0  63.21 -148.58  77.7 5.7 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BARN AK.CAST AK.CCB AK.CRQ AK.CUT AK.GLB AK.HIN AK.I23K 
   AK.J19K AK.K24K AK.M26K AK.M27K AK.MCK AK.PAX AK.POKR 
   AK.PPD AK.PPLA AK.RAG AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SSN AK.TRF AK.WRH 
   AT.PMR AV.RED AV.SPCP IU.COLA TA.M22K 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.02 n 3 
   lp c 0.05 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 2.48e+24 dyne-cm
  Mw = 5.53 
  Z  = 80 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      280    65   -70
   NP2       59    32   -126
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   2.48e+24     18     355
    N   0.00e+00     18      91
    P  -2.48e+24     64     224

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     2.00e+24
       Mxy    -4.18e+23
       Mxz     1.41e+24
       Myy    -2.09e+23
       Myz     6.14e+23
       Mzz    -1.79e+24
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ####   #######                  
                 ######## T ###########              
              ###########   ##############           
             ##############################          
           ##################################        
          ####################################       
         #####################################-      
        #######-------------##################--     
        #---------------------------##########--     
       ---------------------------------######---    
       ------------------------------------###---    
       --------------------------------------#---    
       ---------------   -------------------####-    
        -------------- P ------------------#####     
        --------------   -----------------######     
         -------------------------------#######      
          ----------------------------########       
           #------------------------#########        
             ##-----------------###########          
              ############################           
                 ######################              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
 -1.79e+24   1.41e+24  -6.14e+23 
  1.41e+24   2.00e+24   4.18e+23 
 -6.14e+23   4.18e+23  -2.09e+23 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20210408171018/index.html
	

Magnitudes

ML Magnitude


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3 
lp c 0.05 n 3 
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    2.0    85    45    90   4.80 0.3070
WVFGRD96    4.0    85    50    85   4.89 0.2897
WVFGRD96    6.0    70    60    70   4.89 0.2382
WVFGRD96    8.0    75    75    80   4.94 0.2590
WVFGRD96   10.0    75    75    80   4.94 0.2908
WVFGRD96   12.0    70    85    70   4.94 0.3197
WVFGRD96   14.0    70    85    70   4.95 0.3467
WVFGRD96   16.0   250    90   -70   4.97 0.3707
WVFGRD96   18.0    75    85    70   4.98 0.3948
WVFGRD96   20.0   250    90   -70   5.00 0.4154
WVFGRD96   22.0   250    90   -70   5.02 0.4352
WVFGRD96   24.0    75    85    70   5.04 0.4545
WVFGRD96   26.0   255    90   -70   5.06 0.4725
WVFGRD96   28.0    75    90    75   5.07 0.4886
WVFGRD96   30.0    75    90    75   5.08 0.5020
WVFGRD96   32.0    75    90    75   5.10 0.5127
WVFGRD96   34.0    80    90    75   5.11 0.5204
WVFGRD96   36.0    80    90    75   5.11 0.5252
WVFGRD96   38.0    80    90    75   5.12 0.5273
WVFGRD96   40.0    80    90    80   5.27 0.5259
WVFGRD96   42.0    80    90    80   5.28 0.5257
WVFGRD96   44.0    80    90    80   5.29 0.5291
WVFGRD96   46.0   265    80   -80   5.31 0.5419
WVFGRD96   48.0   265    80   -80   5.32 0.5562
WVFGRD96   50.0   275    75   -75   5.35 0.5763
WVFGRD96   52.0   275    70   -75   5.37 0.6002
WVFGRD96   54.0   275    70   -75   5.39 0.6293
WVFGRD96   56.0   270    65   -80   5.41 0.6624
WVFGRD96   58.0   270    65   -80   5.42 0.6939
WVFGRD96   60.0   270    65   -80   5.43 0.7221
WVFGRD96   62.0   275    65   -75   5.45 0.7476
WVFGRD96   64.0   275    65   -75   5.46 0.7709
WVFGRD96   66.0   275    65   -75   5.47 0.7905
WVFGRD96   68.0   275    65   -75   5.48 0.8070
WVFGRD96   70.0   275    65   -75   5.49 0.8201
WVFGRD96   72.0   275    65   -75   5.50 0.8306
WVFGRD96   74.0   275    65   -75   5.50 0.8380
WVFGRD96   76.0   280    65   -70   5.52 0.8430
WVFGRD96   78.0   280    65   -70   5.52 0.8459
WVFGRD96   80.0   280    65   -70   5.53 0.8467
WVFGRD96   82.0   280    65   -70   5.53 0.8453
WVFGRD96   84.0   280    65   -70   5.54 0.8422
WVFGRD96   86.0   280    65   -70   5.54 0.8377
WVFGRD96   88.0   280    65   -70   5.54 0.8321
WVFGRD96   90.0   280    65   -70   5.55 0.8244
WVFGRD96   92.0   280    65   -70   5.55 0.8158
WVFGRD96   94.0   280    65   -70   5.55 0.8055
WVFGRD96   96.0   280    65   -70   5.55 0.7951
WVFGRD96   98.0   280    65   -70   5.56 0.7832

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   80.0   280    65   -70   5.53 0.8467

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.02 n 3 
lp c 0.05 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureau of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Oklahoma Geological Survey, TexNet, the Iris stations, the Transportable Array of EarthScope and other networks.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Thu Apr 8 12:54:13 CDT 2021