USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2019/06/19 04:55:20:0 62.25 -150.49 14.2 3.8 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CAST AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HDA AK.HIN AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.MLY AK.PAX AK.PPLA AK.PWL AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SKN AK.SSN AK.TRF AK.WRH AT.MENT AT.PMR AV.STLK IU.COLA TA.I20K TA.I23K TA.J18K TA.J19K TA.J20K TA.J25K TA.K20K TA.K24K TA.L18K TA.L19K TA.L26K TA.M17K TA.M19K TA.M22K TA.M24K TA.N18K TA.O18K TA.O19K TA.POKR Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 5.31e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.75 Z = 20 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 41 47 105 NP2 200 45 75 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 5.31e+21 79 25 N 0.00e+00 11 211 P -5.31e+21 1 121 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.22e+21 Mxy 2.39e+21 Mxz 9.13e+20 Myy -3.90e+21 Myz 3.32e+20 Mzz 5.13e+21 -------------# ------------########## ------------################ -----------##################- -----------#####################-- -----------######################--- -----------#######################---- -----------########################----- ----------########## ###########------ ----------########### T ###########------- ----------########### ##########-------- ---------########################--------- ---------#######################---------- --------######################---------- --------#####################----------- -------###################--------- ------#################----------- P ------##############------------- ----##########---------------- ----####-------------------- ##-------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 5.13e+21 9.13e+20 -3.32e+20 9.13e+20 -1.22e+21 -2.39e+21 -3.32e+20 -2.39e+21 -3.90e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20190619045520/index.html |
STK = 200 DIP = 45 RAKE = 75 MW = 3.75 HS = 20.0
The NDK file is 20190619045520.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2019/06/19 04:55:20:0 62.25 -150.49 14.2 3.8 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CAST AK.DHY AK.DIV AK.DOT AK.EYAK AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.HDA AK.HIN AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK AK.MLY AK.PAX AK.PPLA AK.PWL AK.RIDG AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SKN AK.SSN AK.TRF AK.WRH AT.MENT AT.PMR AV.STLK IU.COLA TA.I20K TA.I23K TA.J18K TA.J19K TA.J20K TA.J25K TA.K20K TA.K24K TA.L18K TA.L19K TA.L26K TA.M17K TA.M19K TA.M22K TA.M24K TA.N18K TA.O18K TA.O19K TA.POKR Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 5.31e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.75 Z = 20 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 41 47 105 NP2 200 45 75 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 5.31e+21 79 25 N 0.00e+00 11 211 P -5.31e+21 1 121 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -1.22e+21 Mxy 2.39e+21 Mxz 9.13e+20 Myy -3.90e+21 Myz 3.32e+20 Mzz 5.13e+21 -------------# ------------########## ------------################ -----------##################- -----------#####################-- -----------######################--- -----------#######################---- -----------########################----- ----------########## ###########------ ----------########### T ###########------- ----------########### ##########-------- ---------########################--------- ---------#######################---------- --------######################---------- --------#####################----------- -------###################--------- ------#################----------- P ------##############------------- ----##########---------------- ----####-------------------- ##-------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P 5.13e+21 9.13e+20 -3.32e+20 9.13e+20 -1.22e+21 -2.39e+21 -3.32e+20 -2.39e+21 -3.90e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20190619045520/index.html |
(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 50 45 -90 3.25 0.2836 WVFGRD96 2.0 50 45 -90 3.40 0.3864 WVFGRD96 3.0 55 50 -80 3.43 0.2760 WVFGRD96 4.0 270 80 40 3.35 0.2267 WVFGRD96 5.0 275 20 -20 3.39 0.2531 WVFGRD96 6.0 275 20 -20 3.40 0.2960 WVFGRD96 7.0 270 20 -25 3.42 0.3335 WVFGRD96 8.0 255 15 -40 3.51 0.3628 WVFGRD96 9.0 255 15 -40 3.52 0.3960 WVFGRD96 10.0 260 20 -35 3.55 0.4247 WVFGRD96 11.0 295 30 40 3.60 0.4552 WVFGRD96 12.0 300 30 45 3.63 0.4833 WVFGRD96 13.0 195 45 70 3.64 0.5294 WVFGRD96 14.0 195 45 70 3.66 0.5721 WVFGRD96 15.0 195 45 70 3.68 0.6070 WVFGRD96 16.0 195 45 70 3.70 0.6348 WVFGRD96 17.0 195 45 70 3.72 0.6557 WVFGRD96 18.0 200 45 75 3.73 0.6706 WVFGRD96 19.0 200 45 75 3.74 0.6798 WVFGRD96 20.0 200 45 75 3.75 0.6828 WVFGRD96 21.0 205 45 80 3.77 0.6786 WVFGRD96 22.0 205 45 80 3.78 0.6719 WVFGRD96 23.0 205 45 80 3.78 0.6604 WVFGRD96 24.0 205 45 80 3.79 0.6452 WVFGRD96 25.0 205 45 85 3.80 0.6276 WVFGRD96 26.0 30 45 90 3.80 0.6082 WVFGRD96 27.0 25 45 85 3.81 0.5871 WVFGRD96 28.0 20 45 80 3.81 0.5661 WVFGRD96 29.0 20 45 80 3.82 0.5437
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 20.0 200 45 75 3.75 0.6828
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureau of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Oklahoma Geological Survey, TexNet, the Iris stations, the Transportable Array of EarthScope and other networks.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: