USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2019/05/07 04:58:38:0 39.79 -117.49 5.2 3.9 Nevada Stations used: BK.DANT CI.GRA IM.NV31 NC.AFD NC.LDH NN.CMK6 NN.DSP NN.LHV NN.MPK NN.MZPB NN.PAH NN.PNT NN.PRN NN.Q09A NN.REDF NN.RYN NN.SPR3 NN.WAK NN.WDEM NN.WLDB US.ELK US.WVOR UU.PSUT Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.32e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.51 Z = 12 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 255 50 -65 NP2 39 46 -117 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.32e+21 2 328 N 0.00e+00 19 58 P -2.32e+21 71 232 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.55e+21 Mxy -1.17e+21 Mxz 5.15e+20 Myy 5.14e+20 Myz 5.14e+20 Mzz -2.07e+21 ############## T #################### ## ######################- #############################- ###############################--- #################------------###---- ############----------------------#--- ##########------------------------#####- #######---------------------------###### ######-----------------------------####### ####------------------------------######## ###------------- --------------######### ##-------------- P -------------########## --------------- ------------########## -----------------------------########### --------------------------############ -----------------------############# --------------------############## ---------------############### ----------################## ###################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -2.07e+21 5.15e+20 -5.14e+20 5.15e+20 1.55e+21 1.17e+21 -5.14e+20 1.17e+21 5.14e+20 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20190507045838/index.html |
STK = 255 DIP = 50 RAKE = -65 MW = 3.51 HS = 12.0
The NDK file is 20190507045838.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2019/05/07 04:58:38:0 39.79 -117.49 5.2 3.9 Nevada Stations used: BK.DANT CI.GRA IM.NV31 NC.AFD NC.LDH NN.CMK6 NN.DSP NN.LHV NN.MPK NN.MZPB NN.PAH NN.PNT NN.PRN NN.Q09A NN.REDF NN.RYN NN.SPR3 NN.WAK NN.WDEM NN.WLDB US.ELK US.WVOR UU.PSUT Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.32e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.51 Z = 12 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 255 50 -65 NP2 39 46 -117 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.32e+21 2 328 N 0.00e+00 19 58 P -2.32e+21 71 232 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.55e+21 Mxy -1.17e+21 Mxz 5.15e+20 Myy 5.14e+20 Myz 5.14e+20 Mzz -2.07e+21 ############## T #################### ## ######################- #############################- ###############################--- #################------------###---- ############----------------------#--- ##########------------------------#####- #######---------------------------###### ######-----------------------------####### ####------------------------------######## ###------------- --------------######### ##-------------- P -------------########## --------------- ------------########## -----------------------------########### --------------------------############ -----------------------############# --------------------############## ---------------############### ----------################## ###################### ############## Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -2.07e+21 5.15e+20 -5.14e+20 5.15e+20 1.55e+21 1.17e+21 -5.14e+20 1.17e+21 5.14e+20 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20190507045838/index.html |
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 2.390e+14 N-m Magnitude 3.52 Mwr Depth 8.0 km Percent DC 89% Half Duration - Catalog NN Data Source NN 1 Contributor NN 1 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 253 30 -63 NP2 42 63 -105 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.453e+14 N-m 17 143 N -0.130e+14 N-m 13 49 P -2.322e+14 N-m 68 283 |
(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 285 80 5 3.04 0.2705 WVFGRD96 2.0 105 90 -15 3.14 0.3119 WVFGRD96 3.0 285 90 35 3.22 0.3121 WVFGRD96 4.0 105 85 60 3.31 0.3561 WVFGRD96 5.0 105 85 60 3.33 0.4009 WVFGRD96 6.0 270 75 -55 3.34 0.4373 WVFGRD96 7.0 250 60 -75 3.40 0.4731 WVFGRD96 8.0 50 30 -100 3.48 0.5011 WVFGRD96 9.0 240 55 -85 3.50 0.5372 WVFGRD96 10.0 245 50 -80 3.51 0.5576 WVFGRD96 11.0 250 50 -70 3.51 0.5673 WVFGRD96 12.0 255 50 -65 3.51 0.5674 WVFGRD96 13.0 255 50 -65 3.52 0.5605 WVFGRD96 14.0 260 50 -55 3.52 0.5501 WVFGRD96 15.0 260 50 -55 3.52 0.5361 WVFGRD96 16.0 265 50 -45 3.53 0.5203 WVFGRD96 17.0 265 50 -45 3.53 0.5026 WVFGRD96 18.0 270 50 -40 3.54 0.4830 WVFGRD96 19.0 270 45 -40 3.54 0.4630 WVFGRD96 20.0 270 45 -35 3.55 0.4443 WVFGRD96 21.0 270 45 -35 3.56 0.4283 WVFGRD96 22.0 270 40 -35 3.57 0.4106 WVFGRD96 23.0 270 40 -35 3.57 0.3929 WVFGRD96 24.0 270 40 -35 3.57 0.3747 WVFGRD96 25.0 270 40 -35 3.58 0.3563 WVFGRD96 26.0 270 40 -35 3.58 0.3377 WVFGRD96 27.0 275 40 -30 3.59 0.3187 WVFGRD96 28.0 275 40 -30 3.59 0.2998 WVFGRD96 29.0 275 40 -30 3.59 0.2806
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 12.0 255 50 -65 3.51 0.5674
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.08 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: