USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2018/01/26 03:32:08:0 42.56 -111.48 10.0 4.3 Idaho Stations used: IW.FLWY IW.FXWY IW.IMW IW.LOHW IW.MOOW IW.REDW IW.SNOW IW.TPAW TA.H17A TA.O20A US.AHID US.BW06 US.DUG US.ELK US.HLID US.HWUT US.RLMT UU.BGU UU.BRPU UU.BSUT UU.CTU UU.CVRU UU.FMC UU.HVU UU.MPU UU.NLU UU.RDMU UU.SPU UU.SRU UU.SWUT UU.TMU WY.YFT WY.YHL WY.YMP WY.YNM WY.YNR Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 3.94e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.33 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 145 76 -159 NP2 50 70 -15 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 3.94e+22 4 277 N 0.00e+00 65 178 P -3.94e+22 24 9 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.13e+22 Mxy -9.43e+21 Mxz -1.43e+22 Myy 3.79e+22 Myz -4.94e+21 Mzz -6.55e+21 -------------- ------------ ------- ##------------- P ---------- ####------------ ----------- ######---------------------------# ########-------------------------### ##########-----------------------##### ############---------------------####### ###########------------------######### T ############----------------########### #############-------------############# #################-----------############## ###################-------################ ###################---################## ######################################## ################-----################# ############----------############## #######---------------############ ----------------------######## ------------------------#### ---------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -6.55e+21 -1.43e+22 4.94e+21 -1.43e+22 -3.13e+22 9.43e+21 4.94e+21 9.43e+21 3.79e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20180126033208/index.html |
STK = 50 DIP = 70 RAKE = -15 MW = 4.33 HS = 11.0
The NDK file is 20180126033208.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2018/01/26 03:32:08:0 42.56 -111.48 10.0 4.3 Idaho Stations used: IW.FLWY IW.FXWY IW.IMW IW.LOHW IW.MOOW IW.REDW IW.SNOW IW.TPAW TA.H17A TA.O20A US.AHID US.BW06 US.DUG US.ELK US.HLID US.HWUT US.RLMT UU.BGU UU.BRPU UU.BSUT UU.CTU UU.CVRU UU.FMC UU.HVU UU.MPU UU.NLU UU.RDMU UU.SPU UU.SRU UU.SWUT UU.TMU WY.YFT WY.YHL WY.YMP WY.YNM WY.YNR Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 3.94e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.33 Z = 11 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 145 76 -159 NP2 50 70 -15 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 3.94e+22 4 277 N 0.00e+00 65 178 P -3.94e+22 24 9 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -3.13e+22 Mxy -9.43e+21 Mxz -1.43e+22 Myy 3.79e+22 Myz -4.94e+21 Mzz -6.55e+21 -------------- ------------ ------- ##------------- P ---------- ####------------ ----------- ######---------------------------# ########-------------------------### ##########-----------------------##### ############---------------------####### ###########------------------######### T ############----------------########### #############-------------############# #################-----------############## ###################-------################ ###################---################## ######################################## ################-----################# ############----------############## #######---------------############ ----------------------######## ------------------------#### ---------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -6.55e+21 -1.43e+22 4.94e+21 -1.43e+22 -3.13e+22 9.43e+21 4.94e+21 9.43e+21 3.79e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20180126033208/index.html |
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 4.594e+15 N-m Magnitude 4.4 Mwr Depth 15.0 km Percent DC 68 % Half Duration – Catalog US Data Source US1 Contributor US1 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 146 77 -162 NP2 52 73 -14 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 4.940e+15 N-m 3 278 N -0.795e+15 N-m 68 181 P -4.144e+15 N-m 22 10 |
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 235 85 0 3.84 0.2041 WVFGRD96 2.0 235 80 0 3.98 0.2688 WVFGRD96 3.0 235 70 -5 4.06 0.2927 WVFGRD96 4.0 45 60 -30 4.12 0.3136 WVFGRD96 5.0 45 60 -25 4.14 0.3413 WVFGRD96 6.0 50 65 -20 4.18 0.3648 WVFGRD96 7.0 50 70 -20 4.21 0.3852 WVFGRD96 8.0 50 65 -20 4.27 0.4016 WVFGRD96 9.0 50 70 -20 4.29 0.4132 WVFGRD96 10.0 50 70 -20 4.31 0.4200 WVFGRD96 11.0 50 70 -15 4.33 0.4224 WVFGRD96 12.0 55 75 -15 4.36 0.4223 WVFGRD96 13.0 55 75 -15 4.38 0.4202 WVFGRD96 14.0 55 75 -15 4.39 0.4150 WVFGRD96 15.0 55 75 -15 4.41 0.4071 WVFGRD96 16.0 55 75 -15 4.42 0.3976 WVFGRD96 17.0 55 75 -15 4.43 0.3862 WVFGRD96 18.0 55 75 -15 4.44 0.3732 WVFGRD96 19.0 55 75 -15 4.44 0.3595 WVFGRD96 20.0 55 75 -15 4.45 0.3453 WVFGRD96 21.0 55 75 -15 4.46 0.3300 WVFGRD96 22.0 55 75 -20 4.47 0.3165 WVFGRD96 23.0 55 75 -20 4.47 0.3025 WVFGRD96 24.0 55 75 -20 4.47 0.2902 WVFGRD96 25.0 55 75 -20 4.48 0.2780 WVFGRD96 26.0 55 70 -15 4.47 0.2673 WVFGRD96 27.0 55 70 -15 4.48 0.2570 WVFGRD96 28.0 55 70 -15 4.48 0.2472 WVFGRD96 29.0 55 70 -15 4.48 0.2379
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 11.0 50 70 -15 4.33 0.4224
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: