Location

Location ANSS

2017/06/20 16:03:35 62.759 -148.403 53.9 3.8 Alaska

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2017/06/20 16:03:35:0  62.76 -148.40  53.9 3.8 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BWN AK.CUT AK.DHY AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK 
   AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.TRF AT.PMR 
   TA.N25K 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.5 -30 o DIST/3.5 +70
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 7.24e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.84 
  Z  = 64 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1       95    85    15
   NP2        4    75   175
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   7.24e+21     14     320
    N   0.00e+00     74     113
    P  -7.24e+21      7     228

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     8.87e+20
       Mxy    -6.89e+21
       Mxz     1.89e+21
       Myy    -1.21e+21
       Myz    -4.47e+20
       Mzz     3.26e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     #########-----                  
                 #############---------              
              #   #############-----------           
             ## T #############------------          
           ####   ##############-------------        
          ######################--------------       
         #######################---------------      
        ########################----------------     
        ########################----------------     
       #########################-----------------    
       ----#####################-----------------    
       -----------------########-----------------    
       -------------------------#################    
        -----------------------#################     
        -----------------------#################     
         ----------------------################      
          -   ----------------################       
            P ----------------###############        
              ----------------#############          
              ---------------#############           
                 -----------###########              
                     ------########                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  3.26e+20   1.89e+21   4.47e+20 
  1.89e+21   8.87e+20   6.89e+21 
  4.47e+20   6.89e+21  -1.21e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170620160335/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 95
      DIP = 85
     RAKE = 15
       MW = 3.84
       HS = 64.0

The NDK file is 20170620160335.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU
USGSMT
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2017/06/20 16:03:35:0  62.76 -148.40  53.9 3.8 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BWN AK.CUT AK.DHY AK.GHO AK.GLI AK.KNK AK.KTH AK.MCK 
   AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RND AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SCRK AK.TRF AT.PMR 
   TA.N25K 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.5 -30 o DIST/3.5 +70
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.10 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 7.24e+21 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.84 
  Z  = 64 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1       95    85    15
   NP2        4    75   175
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   7.24e+21     14     320
    N   0.00e+00     74     113
    P  -7.24e+21      7     228

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     8.87e+20
       Mxy    -6.89e+21
       Mxz     1.89e+21
       Myy    -1.21e+21
       Myz    -4.47e+20
       Mzz     3.26e+20
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     #########-----                  
                 #############---------              
              #   #############-----------           
             ## T #############------------          
           ####   ##############-------------        
          ######################--------------       
         #######################---------------      
        ########################----------------     
        ########################----------------     
       #########################-----------------    
       ----#####################-----------------    
       -----------------########-----------------    
       -------------------------#################    
        -----------------------#################     
        -----------------------#################     
         ----------------------################      
          -   ----------------################       
            P ----------------###############        
              ----------------#############          
              ---------------#############           
                 -----------###########              
                     ------########                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
  3.26e+20   1.89e+21   4.47e+20 
  1.89e+21   8.87e+20   6.89e+21 
  4.47e+20   6.89e+21  -1.21e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170620160335/index.html
	
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr)
Moment	7.568e+14 N-m
Magnitude	3.9 Mwr
Depth	60.0 km
Percent DC	83 %
Half Duration	–
Catalog	US
Data Source	US2
Contributor	US2
Nodal Planes
Plane	Strike	Dip	Rake
NP1	1	75	-179
NP2	271	89	-15
Principal Axes
Axis	Value	Plunge	Azimuth
T	7.877e+14 N-m	10	317
N	-0.662e+14 N-m	75	87
P	-7.215e+14 N-m	11	225

        

Magnitudes

ML Magnitude


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.5 -30 o DIST/3.5 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    2.0   125    45   -95   3.07 0.1983
WVFGRD96    4.0   180    70    20   3.06 0.2302
WVFGRD96    6.0     0    65    25   3.14 0.2683
WVFGRD96    8.0     0    60    25   3.23 0.3013
WVFGRD96   10.0     0    60    25   3.28 0.3234
WVFGRD96   12.0     0    65    20   3.32 0.3296
WVFGRD96   14.0     0    65    15   3.34 0.3256
WVFGRD96   16.0   265    65    25   3.38 0.3402
WVFGRD96   18.0   265    60    25   3.41 0.3594
WVFGRD96   20.0   265    65    25   3.44 0.3795
WVFGRD96   22.0   265    65    25   3.47 0.3976
WVFGRD96   24.0   265    65    25   3.49 0.4109
WVFGRD96   26.0   265    65    25   3.51 0.4185
WVFGRD96   28.0    85    80   -10   3.53 0.4312
WVFGRD96   30.0    90    75    15   3.55 0.4406
WVFGRD96   32.0    90    75    10   3.57 0.4575
WVFGRD96   34.0    90    75    10   3.59 0.4679
WVFGRD96   36.0    90    75     5   3.61 0.4734
WVFGRD96   38.0    95    75    10   3.65 0.4802
WVFGRD96   40.0    95    70    10   3.70 0.4899
WVFGRD96   42.0    95    75    15   3.72 0.4915
WVFGRD96   44.0    95    70    15   3.75 0.4971
WVFGRD96   46.0    95    75    15   3.76 0.5021
WVFGRD96   48.0    95    75    15   3.77 0.5066
WVFGRD96   50.0    95    80    15   3.78 0.5143
WVFGRD96   52.0    95    80    15   3.80 0.5217
WVFGRD96   54.0    95    80    15   3.80 0.5288
WVFGRD96   56.0    95    80    15   3.81 0.5328
WVFGRD96   58.0    95    85    15   3.82 0.5352
WVFGRD96   60.0    95    85    15   3.83 0.5387
WVFGRD96   62.0   275    90   -15   3.83 0.5373
WVFGRD96   64.0    95    85    15   3.84 0.5416
WVFGRD96   66.0    95    85    15   3.84 0.5403
WVFGRD96   68.0    90    90    15   3.83 0.5398
WVFGRD96   70.0    90    90    15   3.83 0.5406
WVFGRD96   72.0    90    90    15   3.84 0.5402
WVFGRD96   74.0    90    90    15   3.84 0.5392
WVFGRD96   76.0   270    90   -15   3.85 0.5397
WVFGRD96   78.0    90    90    15   3.85 0.5384
WVFGRD96   80.0   270    90   -15   3.86 0.5375
WVFGRD96   82.0   270    90   -15   3.86 0.5359
WVFGRD96   84.0   270    90   -10   3.86 0.5349
WVFGRD96   86.0   270    90   -10   3.87 0.5334
WVFGRD96   88.0   270    90   -10   3.87 0.5336
WVFGRD96   90.0   270    90   -10   3.87 0.5332
WVFGRD96   92.0    90    90    10   3.88 0.5323
WVFGRD96   94.0    90    90    10   3.88 0.5312
WVFGRD96   96.0    90    90    10   3.89 0.5301
WVFGRD96   98.0    90    90    10   3.89 0.5296

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   64.0    95    85    15   3.84 0.5416

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.5 -30 o DIST/3.5 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Tue Jun 20 12:11:21 CDT 2017