USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/05/13 13:31:08:0 62.17 -147.84 42.6 4.1 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.CAST AK.CUT AK.DIV AK.EYAK AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.MCK AK.PAX AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SSN AK.SWD AK.TRF AK.WAT1 AK.WAT7 AT.PMR TA.L26K TA.M22K TA.M23K TA.N20K TA.N25K TA.P23K Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.91e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.12 Z = 52 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 193 67 -99 NP2 35 25 -70 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.91e+22 21 290 N 0.00e+00 8 197 P -1.91e+22 67 86 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.92e+21 Mxy -5.50e+21 Mxz 1.76e+21 Myy 1.18e+22 Myz -1.28e+22 Mzz -1.37e+22 ###########--- #############--------- ##############-------------# ##############---------------# ###############-----------------## ###############-------------------## ## ##########--------------------### ### T ##########---------------------### ### #########----------------------### ################--------- ----------#### ###############---------- P ----------#### ###############---------- ---------##### ##############-----------------------##### #############----------------------##### #############---------------------###### ############--------------------###### ###########-------------------###### ##########-----------------####### ########---------------####### ########------------######## -####-------########## --############ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.37e+22 1.76e+21 1.28e+22 1.76e+21 1.92e+21 5.50e+21 1.28e+22 5.50e+21 1.18e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170513133108/index.html |
STK = 35 DIP = 25 RAKE = -70 MW = 4.12 HS = 52.0
The NDK file is 20170513133108.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/05/13 13:31:08:0 62.17 -147.84 42.6 4.1 Alaska Stations used: AK.BPAW AK.CAST AK.CUT AK.DIV AK.EYAK AK.FIRE AK.GHO AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK AK.MCK AK.PAX AK.RC01 AK.RIDG AK.SAW AK.SCM AK.SSN AK.SWD AK.TRF AK.WAT1 AK.WAT7 AT.PMR TA.L26K TA.M22K TA.M23K TA.N20K TA.N25K TA.P23K Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.91e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.12 Z = 52 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 193 67 -99 NP2 35 25 -70 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.91e+22 21 290 N 0.00e+00 8 197 P -1.91e+22 67 86 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.92e+21 Mxy -5.50e+21 Mxz 1.76e+21 Myy 1.18e+22 Myz -1.28e+22 Mzz -1.37e+22 ###########--- #############--------- ##############-------------# ##############---------------# ###############-----------------## ###############-------------------## ## ##########--------------------### ### T ##########---------------------### ### #########----------------------### ################--------- ----------#### ###############---------- P ----------#### ###############---------- ---------##### ##############-----------------------##### #############----------------------##### #############---------------------###### ############--------------------###### ###########-------------------###### ##########-----------------####### ########---------------####### ########------------######## -####-------########## --############ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.37e+22 1.76e+21 1.28e+22 1.76e+21 1.92e+21 5.50e+21 1.28e+22 5.50e+21 1.18e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170513133108/index.html |
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 2.0 205 45 85 3.41 0.2589 WVFGRD96 4.0 180 45 35 3.42 0.2573 WVFGRD96 6.0 350 45 25 3.45 0.2907 WVFGRD96 8.0 260 80 50 3.53 0.3163 WVFGRD96 10.0 255 85 45 3.56 0.3331 WVFGRD96 12.0 75 90 -40 3.60 0.3440 WVFGRD96 14.0 70 80 -40 3.64 0.3540 WVFGRD96 16.0 75 90 -35 3.67 0.3633 WVFGRD96 18.0 80 85 -30 3.71 0.3724 WVFGRD96 20.0 80 85 -30 3.74 0.3834 WVFGRD96 22.0 75 80 -30 3.76 0.3951 WVFGRD96 24.0 80 80 -30 3.78 0.4075 WVFGRD96 26.0 75 70 -30 3.80 0.4189 WVFGRD96 28.0 75 65 -30 3.82 0.4361 WVFGRD96 30.0 75 60 -30 3.84 0.4575 WVFGRD96 32.0 70 55 -35 3.86 0.4778 WVFGRD96 34.0 70 55 -35 3.87 0.4968 WVFGRD96 36.0 70 55 -35 3.89 0.5106 WVFGRD96 38.0 60 35 -45 3.91 0.5328 WVFGRD96 40.0 55 30 -50 4.03 0.5595 WVFGRD96 42.0 50 30 -55 4.05 0.5757 WVFGRD96 44.0 50 30 -55 4.07 0.5862 WVFGRD96 46.0 50 30 -55 4.08 0.5959 WVFGRD96 48.0 45 30 -65 4.10 0.6029 WVFGRD96 50.0 50 30 -55 4.10 0.6068 WVFGRD96 52.0 35 25 -70 4.12 0.6074 WVFGRD96 54.0 45 30 -60 4.11 0.6071 WVFGRD96 56.0 45 30 -60 4.12 0.6063 WVFGRD96 58.0 45 30 -60 4.12 0.6050 WVFGRD96 60.0 45 30 -60 4.13 0.6019 WVFGRD96 62.0 45 30 -55 4.13 0.5972 WVFGRD96 64.0 50 35 -50 4.13 0.5936 WVFGRD96 66.0 50 35 -50 4.13 0.5908 WVFGRD96 68.0 50 35 -50 4.14 0.5846 WVFGRD96 70.0 50 35 -50 4.14 0.5796 WVFGRD96 72.0 55 40 -45 4.15 0.5740 WVFGRD96 74.0 55 40 -45 4.15 0.5683 WVFGRD96 76.0 55 40 -45 4.15 0.5621 WVFGRD96 78.0 55 40 -45 4.16 0.5554 WVFGRD96 80.0 55 40 -45 4.16 0.5496 WVFGRD96 82.0 55 40 -45 4.16 0.5420 WVFGRD96 84.0 55 40 -45 4.17 0.5353 WVFGRD96 86.0 60 45 -40 4.17 0.5278 WVFGRD96 88.0 60 45 -40 4.18 0.5225 WVFGRD96 90.0 60 45 -40 4.18 0.5157 WVFGRD96 92.0 65 50 -30 4.19 0.5120 WVFGRD96 94.0 65 50 -30 4.19 0.5068 WVFGRD96 96.0 65 50 -30 4.19 0.5033 WVFGRD96 98.0 65 50 -30 4.20 0.4975
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 52.0 35 25 -70 4.12 0.6074
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -40 o DIST/3.3 +50 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: