Location

Location ANSS

Focal Mechanism

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/01/18 08:04:32:0 38.41 -118.93 8.2 3.8 Nevada Stations used: IM.NV31 LB.TPH NC.MDPB NN.DSP NN.KVN NN.LCH NN.LHV NN.OMMB NN.PNT NN.RYN NN.VCN NN.YER Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.95e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.58 Z = 10 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 307 71 -159 NP2 210 70 -20 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.95e+21 1 78 N 0.00e+00 62 347 P -2.95e+21 28 169 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -2.09e+21 Mxy 1.02e+21 Mxz 1.21e+21 Myy 2.74e+21 Myz -1.95e+20 Mzz -6.49e+20 -------------- ---------------------# ---------------------####### -------------------########### ####----------------############## ##########---------################# ###############---#################### ##################-##################### #################-----################# #################--------############### T ################-----------############# ###############--------------############# ##############-----------------########### ############--------------------######## ###########----------------------####### ##########------------------------#### ########--------------------------## #######----------- ------------# #####----------- P ----------- ####----------- ---------- #--------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -6.49e+20 1.21e+21 1.95e+20 1.21e+21 -2.09e+21 -1.02e+21 1.95e+20 -1.02e+21 2.74e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170118080432/index.html

Preferred Solution

      STK = 210
      DIP = 70
     RAKE = -20
       MW = 3.58
       HS = 10.0

The NDK file is 20170118080432.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others

SLU

UNR

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2017/01/18 08:04:32:0 38.41 -118.93 8.2 3.8 Nevada Stations used: IM.NV31 LB.TPH NC.MDPB NN.DSP NN.KVN NN.LCH NN.LHV NN.OMMB NN.PNT NN.RYN NN.VCN NN.YER Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.10 n 3 br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 2.95e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.58 Z = 10 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 307 71 -159 NP2 210 70 -20 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.95e+21 1 78 N 0.00e+00 62 347 P -2.95e+21 28 169 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -2.09e+21 Mxy 1.02e+21 Mxz 1.21e+21 Myy 2.74e+21 Myz -1.95e+20 Mzz -6.49e+20 -------------- ---------------------# ---------------------####### -------------------########### ####----------------############## ##########---------################# ###############---#################### ##################-##################### #################-----################# #################--------############### T ################-----------############# ###############--------------############# ##############-----------------########### ############--------------------######## ###########----------------------####### ##########------------------------#### ########--------------------------## #######----------- ------------# #####----------- P ----------- ####----------- ---------- #--------------------- -------------- Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -6.49e+20 1.21e+21 1.95e+20 1.21e+21 -2.09e+21 -1.02e+21 1.95e+20 -1.02e+21 2.74e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20170118080432/index.html

Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 2.296e+14 N-m Magnitude 3.5 Mwr Depth 8.0 km Percent DC 93 % Half Duration – Catalog NN Data Source NN2 Contributor NN2 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 319 59 -156 NP2 216 69 -34 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 2.335e+14 N-m 7 270 N -0.080e+14 N-m 51 8 P -2.255e+14 N-m 38 175

Magnitudes

ML Magnitude

(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

Waveform Inversion using wvfgrd96

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.

Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0    35    85     0   3.07 0.1812
WVFGRD96    2.0    35    90     0   3.30 0.3521
WVFGRD96    3.0    35    90    -5   3.37 0.4187
WVFGRD96    4.0    30    75   -15   3.43 0.4539
WVFGRD96    5.0   210    75   -20   3.47 0.4801
WVFGRD96    6.0   210    75   -20   3.49 0.4983
WVFGRD96    7.0   210    75   -20   3.52 0.5096
WVFGRD96    8.0   210    75   -25   3.55 0.5173
WVFGRD96    9.0   210    70   -20   3.57 0.5208
WVFGRD96   10.0   210    70   -20   3.58 0.5219
WVFGRD96   11.0   210    70   -20   3.59 0.5208
WVFGRD96   12.0   210    70   -15   3.60 0.5176
WVFGRD96   13.0   210    70   -15   3.61 0.5136
WVFGRD96   14.0   210    70   -15   3.63 0.5087
WVFGRD96   15.0   210    70   -15   3.63 0.5021
WVFGRD96   16.0   210    70   -15   3.64 0.4946
WVFGRD96   17.0   210    70   -15   3.65 0.4872
WVFGRD96   18.0   210    70   -15   3.66 0.4793
WVFGRD96   19.0   210    70   -15   3.67 0.4709
WVFGRD96   20.0   215    65     0   3.68 0.4636
WVFGRD96   21.0   215    65     0   3.68 0.4560
WVFGRD96   22.0   215    65     0   3.69 0.4490
WVFGRD96   23.0   215    65     0   3.70 0.4421
WVFGRD96   24.0   215    60     0   3.71 0.4352
WVFGRD96   25.0   215    60     0   3.72 0.4291
WVFGRD96   26.0   215    60     0   3.72 0.4227
WVFGRD96   27.0   215    60     0   3.73 0.4162
WVFGRD96   28.0   215    60     5   3.74 0.4105
WVFGRD96   29.0   215    60     5   3.74 0.4043

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   10.0   210    70   -20   3.58 0.5219

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is

Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.10 n 3 
br c 0.12 0.25 n 4 p 2

Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

• The origin time and epicentral distance are incorrect
• The velocity model used for the inversion is incorrect
• The velocity model used to define the P-arrival time is not the same as the velocity model used for the waveform inversion (assuming that the initial trace alignment is based on the P arrival time)

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS.model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files: