Location

2015/08/03 01:56:10 62.811 -148.940 61.9 4.3 Alaska

Arrival Times (from USGS)

Arrival time list

Felt Map

USGS Felt map for this earthquake

USGS Felt reports main page

Focal Mechanism

 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2015/08/03 01:56:10:0  62.81 -148.94  61.9 4.3 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CCB AK.CUT AK.GLI AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK 
   AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.NEA2 AK.PAX AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RND AK.SAW 
   AK.SCM AK.SSN AK.SWD AK.WRH IM.IL31 IU.COLA TA.I23K TA.N25K 
   TA.TCOL 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.07 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 1.22e+22 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.99 
  Z  = 72 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      260    65   -75
   NP2       48    29   -119
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   1.22e+22     19     339
    N   0.00e+00     14      74
    P  -1.22e+22     67     197

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     7.75e+21
       Mxy    -4.22e+21
       Mxz     7.67e+21
       Myy     1.25e+21
       Myz    -1.16e+18
       Mzz    -9.00e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##############                  
                 ###   ################              
              ###### T ###################           
             #######   ####################          
           #################################-        
          ###################################-       
         ####################################--      
        ####################-------------####---     
        ############-------------------------##-     
       #########-----------------------------####    
       ######--------------------------------####    
       ###----------------------------------#####    
       #-----------------   ----------------#####    
        ----------------- P ---------------#####     
        -----------------   --------------######     
         --------------------------------######      
          -----------------------------#######       
           --------------------------########        
             ---------------------#########          
              ##--------------############           
                 ######################              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
 -9.00e+21   7.67e+21   1.16e+18 
  7.67e+21   7.75e+21   4.22e+21 
  1.16e+18   4.22e+21   1.25e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150803015610/index.html
        

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 260
      DIP = 65
     RAKE = -75
       MW = 3.99
       HS = 72.0

The NDK file is 20150803015610.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others
SLU
 USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution
 ENS  2015/08/03 01:56:10:0  62.81 -148.94  61.9 4.3 Alaska
 
 Stations used:
   AK.BPAW AK.BWN AK.CCB AK.CUT AK.GLI AK.HDA AK.KLU AK.KNK 
   AK.MDM AK.MLY AK.NEA2 AK.PAX AK.PWL AK.RC01 AK.RND AK.SAW 
   AK.SCM AK.SSN AK.SWD AK.WRH IM.IL31 IU.COLA TA.I23K TA.N25K 
   TA.TCOL 
 
 Filtering commands used:
   cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
   rtr
   taper w 0.1
   hp c 0.03 n 3 
   lp c 0.07 n 3 
 
 Best Fitting Double Couple
  Mo = 1.22e+22 dyne-cm
  Mw = 3.99 
  Z  = 72 km
  Plane   Strike  Dip  Rake
   NP1      260    65   -75
   NP2       48    29   -119
  Principal Axes:
   Axis    Value   Plunge  Azimuth
    T   1.22e+22     19     339
    N   0.00e+00     14      74
    P  -1.22e+22     67     197

 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm)
    Component   Value
       Mxx     7.75e+21
       Mxy    -4.22e+21
       Mxz     7.67e+21
       Myy     1.25e+21
       Myz    -1.16e+18
       Mzz    -9.00e+21
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
                     ##############                  
                 ###   ################              
              ###### T ###################           
             #######   ####################          
           #################################-        
          ###################################-       
         ####################################--      
        ####################-------------####---     
        ############-------------------------##-     
       #########-----------------------------####    
       ######--------------------------------####    
       ###----------------------------------#####    
       #-----------------   ----------------#####    
        ----------------- P ---------------#####     
        -----------------   --------------######     
         --------------------------------######      
          -----------------------------#######       
           --------------------------########        
             ---------------------#########          
              ##--------------############           
                 ######################              
                     ##############                  
                                                     
                                                     
                                                     
 Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor:
      R          T          P
 -9.00e+21   7.67e+21   1.16e+18 
  7.67e+21   7.75e+21   4.22e+21 
  1.16e+18   4.22e+21   1.25e+21 


Details of the solution is found at

http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150803015610/index.html
	

Magnitudes

mLg Magnitude


(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.

ML Magnitude


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.


(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.07 n 3 
The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    2.0    90    50   -75   3.15 0.1518
WVFGRD96    4.0    95    50   -65   3.30 0.1820
WVFGRD96    6.0   100    50   -55   3.33 0.1870
WVFGRD96    8.0   100    50   -60   3.41 0.2140
WVFGRD96   10.0   115    65   -30   3.40 0.1937
WVFGRD96   12.0   250    90   -50   3.32 0.2099
WVFGRD96   14.0    75    80    50   3.35 0.2254
WVFGRD96   16.0    75    80    50   3.37 0.2383
WVFGRD96   18.0    75    80    50   3.40 0.2481
WVFGRD96   20.0   120    60   -20   3.51 0.2560
WVFGRD96   22.0   120    55   -20   3.52 0.2650
WVFGRD96   24.0   120    90    30   3.57 0.2769
WVFGRD96   26.0   300    90   -30   3.59 0.2873
WVFGRD96   28.0   300    90   -30   3.61 0.2951
WVFGRD96   30.0   300    90   -30   3.63 0.3006
WVFGRD96   32.0   300    80   -30   3.64 0.3094
WVFGRD96   34.0   295    75   -35   3.65 0.3248
WVFGRD96   36.0   295    70   -35   3.67 0.3356
WVFGRD96   38.0   295    65   -35   3.69 0.3454
WVFGRD96   40.0   290    60   -45   3.78 0.3675
WVFGRD96   42.0   285    70   -55   3.80 0.3810
WVFGRD96   44.0   285    70   -60   3.82 0.4058
WVFGRD96   46.0   280    70   -65   3.83 0.4397
WVFGRD96   48.0   280    70   -65   3.86 0.4750
WVFGRD96   50.0   280    70   -65   3.88 0.5088
WVFGRD96   52.0   270    65   -70   3.89 0.5422
WVFGRD96   54.0   265    65   -75   3.91 0.5723
WVFGRD96   56.0   265    65   -75   3.92 0.5984
WVFGRD96   58.0   265    65   -75   3.93 0.6197
WVFGRD96   60.0   265    65   -75   3.94 0.6358
WVFGRD96   62.0   260    65   -75   3.95 0.6485
WVFGRD96   64.0   260    65   -75   3.96 0.6593
WVFGRD96   66.0   260    65   -75   3.97 0.6664
WVFGRD96   68.0   260    65   -75   3.97 0.6707
WVFGRD96   70.0   260    65   -75   3.98 0.6726
WVFGRD96   72.0   260    65   -75   3.99 0.6731
WVFGRD96   74.0   260    65   -75   3.99 0.6715
WVFGRD96   76.0   255    65   -75   4.00 0.6693
WVFGRD96   78.0   255    65   -75   4.01 0.6659
WVFGRD96   80.0   255    65   -75   4.01 0.6615
WVFGRD96   82.0   255    65   -75   4.02 0.6555
WVFGRD96   84.0   255    65   -75   4.02 0.6490
WVFGRD96   86.0   255    65   -75   4.02 0.6430
WVFGRD96   88.0   255    65   -75   4.03 0.6364
WVFGRD96   90.0   255    65   -75   4.03 0.6289
WVFGRD96   92.0   255    65   -75   4.03 0.6207
WVFGRD96   94.0   255    65   -75   4.03 0.6121
WVFGRD96   96.0   255    65   -75   4.04 0.6036
WVFGRD96   98.0   255    65   -75   4.04 0.5944

The best solution is

WVFGRD96   72.0   260    65   -75   3.99 0.6731

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.07 n 3 
Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:

Assuming only a mislocation, the time shifts are fit to a functional form:

 Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth

The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:

The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Mon Dec 7 00:06:20 CST 2015