2015/07/04 16:00:04 37.809 -112.433 10.7 3.9 Utah
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2015/07/04 16:00:04:0 37.81 -112.43 10.7 3.9 Utah Stations used: AE.U15A AE.Y14A CI.GSC CI.LDF IM.NV31 LB.TPH NN.KVN NN.LHV NN.PRN NN.RYN NN.SHP NN.SPR3 TA.O20A TA.R11A TA.W18A US.DUG US.ELK US.HWUT US.MVCO US.TPNV US.WUAZ UU.BGU UU.BRPU UU.CCUT UU.CTU UU.HVU UU.JLU UU.KNB UU.LCMT UU.MPU UU.MTPU UU.PKCU UU.PSUT UU.SRU UU.SZCU UU.TCRU UU.TMU UU.VRUT Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.05 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.02e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 3.94 Z = 5 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 193 61 -96 NP2 25 30 -80 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.02e+22 15 288 N 0.00e+00 5 196 P -1.02e+22 74 89 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 8.78e+20 Mxy -2.77e+21 Mxz 7.35e+20 Myy 7.85e+21 Myz -5.22e+21 Mzz -8.73e+21 ###########--- ############---------# #############-------------## #############---------------## ##############-----------------### ##############------------------#### # ##########--------------------#### ## T #########---------------------##### ## #########---------------------##### ##############---------- ---------###### ##############---------- P ---------###### #############----------- ---------###### #############-----------------------###### ############----------------------###### ############---------------------####### ###########--------------------####### ##########-------------------####### #########-----------------######## #######----------------####### #######------------######### #####--------######### --############ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -8.73e+21 7.35e+20 5.22e+21 7.35e+20 8.78e+20 2.77e+21 5.22e+21 2.77e+21 7.85e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150704160004/index.html |
STK = 25 DIP = 30 RAKE = -80 MW = 3.94 HS = 5.0
The NDK file is 20150704160004.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2015/07/04 16:00:04:0 37.81 -112.43 10.7 3.9 Utah Stations used: AE.U15A AE.Y14A CI.GSC CI.LDF IM.NV31 LB.TPH NN.KVN NN.LHV NN.PRN NN.RYN NN.SHP NN.SPR3 TA.O20A TA.R11A TA.W18A US.DUG US.ELK US.HWUT US.MVCO US.TPNV US.WUAZ UU.BGU UU.BRPU UU.CCUT UU.CTU UU.HVU UU.JLU UU.KNB UU.LCMT UU.MPU UU.MTPU UU.PKCU UU.PSUT UU.SRU UU.SZCU UU.TCRU UU.TMU UU.VRUT Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.05 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.02e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 3.94 Z = 5 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 193 61 -96 NP2 25 30 -80 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.02e+22 15 288 N 0.00e+00 5 196 P -1.02e+22 74 89 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 8.78e+20 Mxy -2.77e+21 Mxz 7.35e+20 Myy 7.85e+21 Myz -5.22e+21 Mzz -8.73e+21 ###########--- ############---------# #############-------------## #############---------------## ##############-----------------### ##############------------------#### # ##########--------------------#### ## T #########---------------------##### ## #########---------------------##### ##############---------- ---------###### ##############---------- P ---------###### #############----------- ---------###### #############-----------------------###### ############----------------------###### ############---------------------####### ###########--------------------####### ##########-------------------####### #########-----------------######## #######----------------####### #######------------######### #####--------######### --############ Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -8.73e+21 7.35e+20 5.22e+21 7.35e+20 8.78e+20 2.77e+21 5.22e+21 2.77e+21 7.85e+21 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150704160004/index.html |
Regional Moment Tensor (Mwr) Moment 1.211e+15 N-m Magnitude 3.99 Depth 4.0 km Percent DC 84% Half Duration – Catalog US (us10002nek) Data Source US1 Contributor US1 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 191 62 -101 NP2 32 30 -71 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.157 16 288 N 0.101 9 196 P -1.258 71 77 |
(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.05 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 25 40 -75 3.71 0.4558 WVFGRD96 2.0 30 35 -70 3.82 0.5491 WVFGRD96 3.0 35 30 -60 3.89 0.5721 WVFGRD96 4.0 30 30 -70 3.92 0.6128 WVFGRD96 5.0 25 30 -80 3.94 0.6300 WVFGRD96 6.0 25 30 -80 3.94 0.6244 WVFGRD96 7.0 20 30 -85 3.93 0.5983 WVFGRD96 8.0 20 30 -85 3.99 0.6240 WVFGRD96 9.0 20 30 -85 3.98 0.5795 WVFGRD96 10.0 15 30 -90 3.97 0.5308 WVFGRD96 11.0 40 40 -50 3.92 0.4882 WVFGRD96 12.0 245 65 40 3.89 0.4676 WVFGRD96 13.0 245 65 40 3.90 0.4729 WVFGRD96 14.0 250 65 40 3.91 0.4766 WVFGRD96 15.0 250 65 40 3.91 0.4785 WVFGRD96 16.0 250 65 40 3.92 0.4785 WVFGRD96 17.0 250 65 40 3.92 0.4772 WVFGRD96 18.0 250 65 40 3.93 0.4748 WVFGRD96 19.0 250 65 40 3.93 0.4716 WVFGRD96 20.0 250 65 35 3.93 0.4683 WVFGRD96 21.0 250 65 35 3.94 0.4622 WVFGRD96 22.0 250 65 35 3.95 0.4588 WVFGRD96 23.0 290 50 30 3.95 0.4524 WVFGRD96 24.0 290 50 30 3.96 0.4522 WVFGRD96 25.0 290 50 30 3.96 0.4513 WVFGRD96 26.0 290 50 30 3.97 0.4503 WVFGRD96 27.0 285 55 25 3.98 0.4492 WVFGRD96 28.0 285 55 25 3.99 0.4484 WVFGRD96 29.0 285 50 25 3.99 0.4476
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 5.0 25 30 -80 3.94 0.6300
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -20 o DIST/3.3 +60 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.05 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: