Location

2015/03/23 20:16:15 36.128 -97.577 1.9 3.7 Oklahoma

Arrival Times (from USGS)

Felt Map

Focal Mechanism

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2015/03/23 20:16:15:0 36.13 -97.58 1.9 3.7 Oklahoma Stations used: GS.KAN01 GS.KAN08 GS.KAN09 GS.KAN10 GS.KAN11 GS.KAN14 GS.OK025 GS.OK029 GS.OK032 N4.R32B N4.Z35B OK.BCOK OK.CROK OK.FNO US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.WMOK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.70e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.42 Z = 3 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 125 60 -45 NP2 242 52 -141 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.70e+21 5 185 N 0.00e+00 38 278 P -1.70e+21 52 89 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.68e+21 Mxy 1.33e+20 Mxz -1.47e+20 Myy -6.35e+20 Myz -8.36e+20 Mzz -1.04e+21 ############## ###################### ############################ ############################## #########################--####### -################------------------- ---###########------------------------ -----#######---------------------------- -----#####------------------------------ --------#-------------------- ---------- -------##-------------------- P ---------- ------#####------------------ ---------- -----#######------------------------------ ---###########-------------------------- --##############------------------------ -#################-------------------- #####################--------------- ##########################-------- ############################## ############################ ######## ########### #### T ####### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.04e+21 -1.47e+20 8.36e+20 -1.47e+20 1.68e+21 -1.33e+20 8.36e+20 -1.33e+20 -6.35e+20 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150323201615/index.html

Preferred Solution

The preferred solution from an analysis of the surface-wave spectral amplitude radiation pattern, waveform inversion and first motion observations is

      STK = 125
      DIP = 60
     RAKE = -45
       MW = 3.42
       HS = 3.0

The NDK file is 20150323201615.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.

Moment Tensor Comparison

The following compares this source inversion to others

SLU

USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2015/03/23 20:16:15:0 36.13 -97.58 1.9 3.7 Oklahoma Stations used: GS.KAN01 GS.KAN08 GS.KAN09 GS.KAN10 GS.KAN11 GS.KAN14 GS.OK025 GS.OK029 GS.OK032 N4.R32B N4.Z35B OK.BCOK OK.CROK OK.FNO US.CBKS US.KSU1 US.WMOK Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.03 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 1.70e+21 dyne-cm Mw = 3.42 Z = 3 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 125 60 -45 NP2 242 52 -141 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 1.70e+21 5 185 N 0.00e+00 38 278 P -1.70e+21 52 89 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx 1.68e+21 Mxy 1.33e+20 Mxz -1.47e+20 Myy -6.35e+20 Myz -8.36e+20 Mzz -1.04e+21 ############## ###################### ############################ ############################## #########################--####### -################------------------- ---###########------------------------ -----#######---------------------------- -----#####------------------------------ --------#-------------------- ---------- -------##-------------------- P ---------- ------#####------------------ ---------- -----#######------------------------------ ---###########-------------------------- --##############------------------------ -#################-------------------- #####################--------------- ##########################-------- ############################## ############################ ######## ########### #### T ####### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -1.04e+21 -1.47e+20 8.36e+20 -1.47e+20 1.68e+21 -1.33e+20 8.36e+20 -1.33e+20 -6.35e+20 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20150323201615/index.html

Magnitudes

mLg Magnitude

(a) mLg computed using the IASPEI formula; (b) mLg residuals ; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated.

ML Magnitude

(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.

Context

The next figure presents the focal mechanism for this earthquake (red) in the context of other events (blue) in the SLU Moment Tensor Catalog which are within ± 0.5 degrees of the new event. This comparison is shown in the left panel of the figure. The right panel shows the inferred direction of maximum compressive stress and the type of faulting (green is strike-slip, red is normal, blue is thrust; oblique is shown by a combination of colors).

Waveform Inversion

The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.

Location of broadband stations used for waveform inversion

The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.

The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.07 n 3

The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:

           DEPTH  STK   DIP  RAKE   MW    FIT
WVFGRD96    1.0   310    70   -15   3.21 0.4167
WVFGRD96    2.0   130    65   -30   3.33 0.4963
WVFGRD96    3.0   125    60   -45   3.42 0.5628
WVFGRD96    4.0   125    65   -30   3.45 0.5596
WVFGRD96    5.0   130    90    15   3.47 0.5351
WVFGRD96    6.0   310    90   -15   3.49 0.5117
WVFGRD96    7.0   130    85    10   3.51 0.4853
WVFGRD96    8.0   130    85    15   3.54 0.4587
WVFGRD96    9.0   320    70    30   3.53 0.4433
WVFGRD96   10.0   320    70    30   3.55 0.4455
WVFGRD96   11.0   320    75    35   3.57 0.4473
WVFGRD96   12.0   320    75    35   3.58 0.4482
WVFGRD96   13.0   325    70    35   3.58 0.4493
WVFGRD96   14.0   325    70    35   3.59 0.4498
WVFGRD96   15.0   325    70    35   3.60 0.4498
WVFGRD96   16.0   325    70    35   3.61 0.4494
WVFGRD96   17.0   325    70    35   3.62 0.4483
WVFGRD96   18.0   325    70    35   3.63 0.4471
WVFGRD96   19.0   325    65    30   3.62 0.4462
WVFGRD96   20.0   325    65    35   3.64 0.4455
WVFGRD96   21.0   325    65    35   3.65 0.4443
WVFGRD96   22.0   325    65    35   3.66 0.4434
WVFGRD96   23.0   325    65    35   3.67 0.4423
WVFGRD96   24.0   325    60    30   3.66 0.4416
WVFGRD96   25.0   325    60    30   3.67 0.4410
WVFGRD96   26.0   325    60    30   3.68 0.4400
WVFGRD96   27.0   325    60    30   3.69 0.4384
WVFGRD96   28.0   325    60    30   3.70 0.4362
WVFGRD96   29.0   325    60    30   3.70 0.4329

The best solution is

WVFGRD96    3.0   125    60   -45   3.42 0.5628

The mechanism correspond to the best fit is

Figure 1. Waveform inversion focal mechanism

The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:

Figure 2. Depth sensitivity for waveform mechanism

The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).

The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was

cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70
rtr
taper w 0.1
hp c 0.03 n 3 
lp c 0.07 n 3

Figure 3. Waveform comparison for selected depth. Red: observed; Blue - predicted. The time shift with respect to the model prediction is indicated. The percent of fit is also indicated.

Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure.

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.

Velocity Model

The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:

MODEL.01
Model after     8 iterations
ISOTROPIC
KGS
FLAT EARTH
1-D
CONSTANT VELOCITY
LINE08
LINE09
LINE10
LINE11
      H(KM)   VP(KM/S)   VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC)         QP         QS       ETAP       ETAS      FREFP      FREFS
     1.9000     3.4065     2.0089     2.2150  0.302E-02  0.679E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     6.1000     5.5445     3.2953     2.6089  0.349E-02  0.784E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    13.0000     6.2708     3.7396     2.7812  0.212E-02  0.476E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
    19.0000     6.4075     3.7680     2.8223  0.111E-02  0.249E-02   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00    
     0.0000     7.9000     4.6200     3.2760  0.164E-10  0.370E-10   0.00       0.00       1.00       1.00

Quality Control

Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets

The following stations did not have a valid response files:

Last Changed Mon Dec 7 00:01:48 CST 2015