2014/11/06 08:34:46 41.904 -119.656 5.3 4.7 Nevada
USGS Felt map for this earthquake
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/11/06 08:34:46:0 41.90 -119.66 5.3 4.7 Nevada Stations used: BK.SAO BK.WDC IM.NV31 IU.COR IW.MFID IW.PLID LB.TPH NC.AFD NC.GDXB NC.KCPB NC.KEB NC.KHMB NC.KMR NC.KRMB NC.MDPB NN.BEK NN.KVN NN.LHV NN.OMMB NN.PAH NN.PNT NN.REDF NN.RUB NN.RYN NN.VCN NN.WAK NN.WDEM TA.R11A UO.PINE US.BMO US.ELK US.HAWA US.HLID UU.BGU UU.HVU UW.BLOW UW.BRAN UW.CCRK UW.DDRF UW.IRON UW.IZEE UW.LON UW.PHIN UW.TUCA UW.UMAT UW.WOLL UW.YACT Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 3.94e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.33 Z = 12 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 352 71 -159 NP2 255 70 -20 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 3.94e+22 1 123 N 0.00e+00 62 32 P -3.94e+22 28 214 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -9.30e+21 Mxy -3.23e+22 Mxz 1.32e+22 Myy 1.80e+22 Myz 9.55e+21 Mzz -8.65e+21 #####--------- ##########------------ ##############-------------- ################-------------- ###################--------------- #####################--------------- ######################---------------- ########################---#########---- ##################------################ #############------------################# #########-----------------################ ######--------------------################ ####----------------------################ #------------------------############### -------------------------############### ------------------------############## -------- ------------########## ------- P ------------########## T ----- ------------########## ------------------########## ---------------####### ----------#### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -8.65e+21 1.32e+22 -9.55e+21 1.32e+22 -9.30e+21 3.23e+22 -9.55e+21 3.23e+22 1.80e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20141106083446/index.html |
STK = 255 DIP = 70 RAKE = -20 MW = 4.33 HS = 12.0
The NDK file is 20141106083446.ndk The waveform inversion is preferred.
The following compares this source inversion to others
USGS/SLU Moment Tensor Solution ENS 2014/11/06 08:34:46:0 41.90 -119.66 5.3 4.7 Nevada Stations used: BK.SAO BK.WDC IM.NV31 IU.COR IW.MFID IW.PLID LB.TPH NC.AFD NC.GDXB NC.KCPB NC.KEB NC.KHMB NC.KMR NC.KRMB NC.MDPB NN.BEK NN.KVN NN.LHV NN.OMMB NN.PAH NN.PNT NN.REDF NN.RUB NN.RYN NN.VCN NN.WAK NN.WDEM TA.R11A UO.PINE US.BMO US.ELK US.HAWA US.HLID UU.BGU UU.HVU UW.BLOW UW.BRAN UW.CCRK UW.DDRF UW.IRON UW.IZEE UW.LON UW.PHIN UW.TUCA UW.UMAT UW.WOLL UW.YACT Filtering commands used: cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3 Best Fitting Double Couple Mo = 3.94e+22 dyne-cm Mw = 4.33 Z = 12 km Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 352 71 -159 NP2 255 70 -20 Principal Axes: Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 3.94e+22 1 123 N 0.00e+00 62 32 P -3.94e+22 28 214 Moment Tensor: (dyne-cm) Component Value Mxx -9.30e+21 Mxy -3.23e+22 Mxz 1.32e+22 Myy 1.80e+22 Myz 9.55e+21 Mzz -8.65e+21 #####--------- ##########------------ ##############-------------- ################-------------- ###################--------------- #####################--------------- ######################---------------- ########################---#########---- ##################------################ #############------------################# #########-----------------################ ######--------------------################ ####----------------------################ #------------------------############### -------------------------############### ------------------------############## -------- ------------########## ------- P ------------########## T ----- ------------########## ------------------########## ---------------####### ----------#### Global CMT Convention Moment Tensor: R T P -8.65e+21 1.32e+22 -9.55e+21 1.32e+22 -9.30e+21 3.23e+22 -9.55e+21 3.23e+22 1.80e+22 Details of the solution is found at http://www.eas.slu.edu/eqc/eqc_mt/MECH.NA/20141106083446/index.html |
Moment 4.13e+15 N-m Magnitude 4.3 Percent DC 98% Depth 8.0 km Updated 2014-11-06 09:30:22 UTC Author nn Catalog nn Contributor nn Code nn00466441 Principal Axes Axis Value Plunge Azimuth T 4.144 4 304 N -0.023 33 37 P -4.121 57 208 Nodal Planes Plane Strike Dip Rake NP1 242 57 -50 NP2 4 50 -135 |
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Horizontal components; (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
(a) ML computed using the IASPEI formula for Vertical components (research); (b) ML residuals computed using a modified IASPEI formula that accounts for path specific attenuation; the values used for the trimmed mean are indicated. The ML relation used for each figure is given at the bottom of each plot.
The focal mechanism was determined using broadband seismic waveforms. The location of the event and the and stations used for the waveform inversion are shown in the next figure.
|
The program wvfgrd96 was used with good traces observed at short distance to determine the focal mechanism, depth and seismic moment. This technique requires a high quality signal and well determined velocity model for the Green functions. To the extent that these are the quality data, this type of mechanism should be preferred over the radiation pattern technique which requires the separate step of defining the pressure and tension quadrants and the correct strike.
The observed and predicted traces are filtered using the following gsac commands:
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3The results of this grid search from 0.5 to 19 km depth are as follow:
DEPTH STK DIP RAKE MW FIT WVFGRD96 1.0 80 85 5 4.01 0.4204 WVFGRD96 2.0 80 85 5 4.09 0.4904 WVFGRD96 3.0 80 90 -15 4.13 0.5160 WVFGRD96 4.0 255 70 -30 4.19 0.5436 WVFGRD96 5.0 255 70 -30 4.21 0.5724 WVFGRD96 6.0 255 65 -25 4.23 0.5964 WVFGRD96 7.0 255 65 -25 4.25 0.6139 WVFGRD96 8.0 255 65 -25 4.29 0.6340 WVFGRD96 9.0 255 65 -25 4.30 0.6447 WVFGRD96 10.0 255 65 -25 4.31 0.6503 WVFGRD96 11.0 255 70 -20 4.32 0.6532 WVFGRD96 12.0 255 70 -20 4.33 0.6538 WVFGRD96 13.0 255 70 -20 4.34 0.6516 WVFGRD96 14.0 260 75 -15 4.35 0.6478 WVFGRD96 15.0 260 75 -15 4.36 0.6430 WVFGRD96 16.0 260 75 -15 4.37 0.6365 WVFGRD96 17.0 260 75 -15 4.37 0.6283 WVFGRD96 18.0 260 75 -15 4.38 0.6187 WVFGRD96 19.0 260 75 -15 4.39 0.6078 WVFGRD96 20.0 260 75 -15 4.40 0.5960 WVFGRD96 21.0 260 75 -15 4.41 0.5834 WVFGRD96 22.0 260 75 -15 4.41 0.5700 WVFGRD96 23.0 260 75 -15 4.42 0.5561 WVFGRD96 24.0 260 75 -15 4.42 0.5416 WVFGRD96 25.0 260 75 -15 4.43 0.5267 WVFGRD96 26.0 260 75 -15 4.44 0.5114 WVFGRD96 27.0 260 80 -15 4.44 0.4958 WVFGRD96 28.0 260 80 -15 4.45 0.4801 WVFGRD96 29.0 260 75 -10 4.46 0.4642
The best solution is
WVFGRD96 12.0 255 70 -20 4.33 0.6538
The mechanism correspond to the best fit is
|
The best fit as a function of depth is given in the following figure:
|
The comparison of the observed and predicted waveforms is given in the next figure. The red traces are the observed and the blue are the predicted. Each observed-predicted component is plotted to the same scale and peak amplitudes are indicated by the numbers to the left of each trace. A pair of numbers is given in black at the right of each predicted traces. The upper number it the time shift required for maximum correlation between the observed and predicted traces. This time shift is required because the synthetics are not computed at exactly the same distance as the observed and because the velocity model used in the predictions may not be perfect. A positive time shift indicates that the prediction is too fast and should be delayed to match the observed trace (shift to the right in this figure). A negative value indicates that the prediction is too slow. The lower number gives the percentage of variance reduction to characterize the individual goodness of fit (100% indicates a perfect fit).
The bandpass filter used in the processing and for the display was
cut o DIST/3.3 -30 o DIST/3.3 +70 rtr taper w 0.1 hp c 0.02 n 3 lp c 0.07 n 3
|
Focal mechanism sensitivity at the preferred depth. The red color indicates a very good fit to thewavefroms. Each solution is plotted as a vector at a given value of strike and dip with the angle of the vector representing the rake angle, measured, with respect to the upward vertical (N) in the figure. |
A check on the assumed source location is possible by looking at the time shifts between the observed and predicted traces. The time shifts for waveform matching arise for several reasons:
Time_shift = A + B cos Azimuth + C Sin Azimuth
The time shifts for this inversion lead to the next figure:
The derived shift in origin time and epicentral coordinates are given at the bottom of the figure.
Thanks also to the many seismic network operators whose dedication make this effort possible: University of Nevada Reno, University of Alaska, University of Washington, Oregon State University, University of Utah, Montana Bureas of Mines, UC Berkely, Caltech, UC San Diego, Saint Louis University, University of Memphis, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, the Iris stations and the Transportable Array of EarthScope.
The WUS model used for the waveform synthetic seismograms and for the surface wave eigenfunctions and dispersion is as follows:
MODEL.01 Model after 8 iterations ISOTROPIC KGS FLAT EARTH 1-D CONSTANT VELOCITY LINE08 LINE09 LINE10 LINE11 H(KM) VP(KM/S) VS(KM/S) RHO(GM/CC) QP QS ETAP ETAS FREFP FREFS 1.9000 3.4065 2.0089 2.2150 0.302E-02 0.679E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 6.1000 5.5445 3.2953 2.6089 0.349E-02 0.784E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.0000 6.2708 3.7396 2.7812 0.212E-02 0.476E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 19.0000 6.4075 3.7680 2.8223 0.111E-02 0.249E-02 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0000 7.9000 4.6200 3.2760 0.164E-10 0.370E-10 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Here we tabulate the reasons for not using certain digital data sets
The following stations did not have a valid response files: